Way too much for a guy who can't shoot.Quote:
Originally Posted by 54-46
Printable View
Way too much for a guy who can't shoot.Quote:
Originally Posted by 54-46
Which means Cronin will match it. I think teams are figuring out that this guy might not know what he's doing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Danno
Prescient.Quote:
Originally Posted by Adolf Allerbush
Still, whether the offer was too high and whether the Blazers should match are two separate questions. I would not have offered Thybulle that much, but I might have matched an offer of that size.
I can only guess that it's a long game for Cronin...meaning he thinks locking up guys like Grant and Thybulle on these deals means that we will be able to trade them mid-season/mid-contract when playoff bound teams think they need a guy for whatever reason...then the Blazers presumably would get back some nice picks or some younger player(s) with upside? Otherwise I don't see the point in locking up cap space with these guys to be on a team that's destine to finish close to the bottom of the standings.Quote:
Originally Posted by Danno
I would not lump Thybulle and Grant together. For one, Grant is 5/$160M and Thybulle is 3/$33M, vastly different. And Thybulle is quite young and could contribute on the same timeline as their young guys, and $11M isn't locking up a ton of cap space, and is a tradeable contract. Plus, letting an asset walk for nothing is, well, a waste.Quote:
Originally Posted by Adolf Allerbush
Grant's contract, well, that makes no sense to me. I don't see how it's a tradeable asset that would bring back anything, plus you have to match salaries so they would have to take back a bad contract.
Dame's agent apparently contacting teams telling every one not named the Miami Heat that they should not trade for him unless they want a "very unhappy player".
I'm all for player empowerment, but do contracts mean nothing in the NBA anymore? He wants out, Portland is going to help him, but Portland's obligation is to make sure they get as much as possible in return, not guaranteeing his happiness.
Only hope as a long time fan is the new team will be athletic as hell and exciting to watch like the young Clippers back in the day. I'm a big time Dame homer and hope he lands where he wants but hope his peeps don't muddy the waters too much. It would be a real shitty way for such a stand up guy to finish his stay in Portland.Quote:
Originally Posted by Adolf Allerbush
Woj kinda made it out to be not a big deal or a bad look: "As interference goes, this is a time-honored agent maneuver to depress offers and clear a path to a predetermined destination."Quote:
Originally Posted by BmillsSkier
Agree. Trying to figure out Cronin is not possible.Quote:
Originally Posted by Danno
Yep, this is kind of standard procedure. Won’t be the first time or last by any means.Quote:
Originally Posted by Danno
It all sucks but I think GMs gotta know that Dame isn't capable of mailing it in. His agent can say that but you put him on a good team like the Sixers and he's going to play his ass off. He's way too competitive to become a Russ or Harden.
Sent from my SM-S918U1 using Tapatalk
It’s being dramatized. Perfectly normal for teams interested in a player to want to know if he’ll actually be happy there or not. Some GM got his feelings hurt.
Exactly. Although I can't really see him going to Utah and being happy even though they're one of the teams that could provide the biggest haul. Brooklyn? Maybe. I bet he'd play his ass off for them...and they'd probably have better luck getting another piece around him. Sixers too, like you point out. I just don't want the Blazers to setting on some dogshit offer from the Heat...I'd rather have him go into the season as a Zer than get 25 or 50 cents on the dollar for him.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Reverend Floater
Agree about Dame.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Reverend Floater
Russ plays hard. It’s just that he can’t shoot and exhibits overconfidence and poor timing with his shooting (in)ability.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
why not Utah? He went to college there (or do you know something like he hated Utah while he was there?).Quote:
Originally Posted by Adolf Allerbush
It doesn't really have anything to do with Utah itself, other than size or market and where they're at relative to competing for a championship. East seems easier than the West (no Joker/Den in the way) for example.Quote:
Originally Posted by Danno
ETA: Just listed to the BS Pod...his take on the greatest trailblazers is exactly what I've been thinking. It's #1 Walton, #2 Drexler, #3 Dame...
Air Drexler!!!
Objectively that list is probably right but subjectively Dame could very easily be #1 for being a better leader, team mate and ambassador of the team than the other 2. It isn't his fault he had Neil Olshey during his prime that loved his choices better than trying to get better. People forget how short Walton was here and how loaded of a team the team was around Clyde. Porter, Buck , Kersey and even Duckworth were all legit. All Dame had was CJ, basically a lesser version of himself and nobody else during his tenure. Never bitched(until now) where Clyde whined from the beginning and was known for his laziness. Stories of Clyde showing up 20 minutes before games was legendary .Quote:
Originally Posted by Adolf Allerbush
Sorry, time to take my Dame homer hat off......
WHAT?!?!? No outrage at the Brittany beat down???
She’s still waiting for an apology for tapping him on the back.
First half observations…. Dude is pretty long, he blocked a Miller three point attempt nobody else would’ve got. He likes to put it on the floor, that length can be a detriment at times, shorter guys have stripped the ball from him a few times. The length also allows him to make some pretty nice passes, he can thread a needle easier when his arms are that long. He’s got a pretty good vision and sees his teammates well.
He’s going to be pretty good.
Putting Walton ahead of Clyde or Dame is CRIMINAL.Quote:
Originally Posted by Adolf Allerbush
Sent from my SM-S918U1 using Tapatalk
Hmmmmmmm, Walton got them a championship.
Edit: Mrs. Plug said “Whadya mean?”
I explained about picking the greatest Blazer. She said: “Pétur Karl Guðmundsson”
(He’s a family friend.)
Walton’s career there was limited due to injury but he be way ahead of either of them before his feet flopped. And ya, he brought a ring back and they didn’t. Kinda a big dealQuote:
Originally Posted by The Reverend Floater
Walton was PART of a championship team that was pretty loaded. Yes, he was the best player but I'd argue that he wasn't the best player to ever wear a Blazer uniform. I'd say Clyde, Dame, Roy and Pippen were better players.
Sent from my SM-S918U1 using Tapatalk
Well, it’s a team game.
Watched the Pistons and Magic this afternoon. The Pistons played a lot of their rostered players, Ivey, Wiseman, and Duren got a lot of minutes. Wiseman looked pretty good, definitely seemed interested in playing the game. The rookies looked ready to play, Sasser handled the ball a lot and made some shots. Thompson was aggressive and looks like he’ll be a good defender, he moves his feet well and stays in front of his man.
Hoping for the play in, but knowing they’ll crush my soul and I’ll watch loss after loss this season.
This looks dope!
https://www.oregonlive.com/sports/20...source=twitter
Sent from my Pixel 6 Pro using Tapatalk
Roy was a freak but his career was even shorter than Walton's and they never won shit with him. Bill Walton was pretty awesome in his healthy days leading a NOT so loaded team to the playoffs. Outside Maurice Lucas that championship team was full of slightly above journeyman players. Clyde's team on the other hand was built to win but Detroit in their prime and this guy they passed in made sure that second ring will have to wait.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Reverend Floater
Blazer's training staff fucked Walton when they kept sending him back out with a fucked up foot.
Peak Walton was better than all those guys. He's the only one of them who ever had a legit claim on being the best player in the league. But peak Walton was less than 200 games.
Fine.
But I reserve the right to continue hating him.
Sent from my SM-S918U1 using Tapatalk
Totally agree he doesn't get the credit he deserves due to his shortened career. He took a long hiatus to heal up then had another mini run with Boston as a sixth man.Quote:
Originally Posted by I've seen black diamonds!
Do you hate Walton the player or the broadcaster ?Quote:
Originally Posted by The Reverend Floater
Broadcaster, Blazer and deadhead. He brings all of them a bad name.Quote:
Originally Posted by fatnslow
Sent from my SM-S918U1 using Tapatalk
TruthQuote:
Originally Posted by I've seen black diamonds!
Terrrribullll take lol
Who is the "greatest Blazer ever" is its own question; longevity plays a role in that. But Walton at his best was better than those other guys.
Hard to argue against Bill, yeah he’s kind of a dick. But, he brought the only championship in “recent” memory. Clyde was good, but he ran up against those pesky Pistons.
See, those things are the reasons I like Bill Walton.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Reverend Floater
God I hate Ainge. He owns the sixers (commence fultz trade PTSD ). Put the most troll like poison pill in the B Ball Paul offer sheet. If his team gets to (not necessarily wins ) the conference semis, his contract is fully guaranteed.
Good business bc the rebuilding Jazz are less likely to do so, and by doing that to match the so
Sixers will owe an extra $14mm in luxury tax, and every sixers fan recognizes the subtile dig about the second round. God I hate Ainge !!!
I don't have much of an opinion on him but that Paul Reed contract is a masterclass middle finger to a former rival.