Nude photos without the subjects knowledge and or permissions

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ill-advised strategy

You realize this community existed before tgr hosted it right?
If tgr nukes it, ski buddies from the group are going to stay in touch regardless, and somebody will make a forum somewhere where we'll be a bunch of asshole ski jocks.

---

I'm asking TGR as a company, what they think.

I know what you all think.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mtngirl79

I'm asking TGR as a company, what they think.

I know what you all think.

---

They don't give a shit about you.

So you think 1300 dollars should have bought my silence?

You helped me so I sold my rights to opinions different from yours?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NW_SKIER

They don't give a shit about you.

---

Maybe so. But I bet they give a shit about their image, reputation and name...

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...3bbecf3adc.png

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mtngirl79

This has nothing to do with my feeling about porn, nudity or sexuality or if I think porn should or should not exist anywhere and everywhere.

It is about consent and respect. It's about how a person feels when their privacy and trust has been violated. It's about the fact that once a nude picture is online, it's there to potentially haunt someone forever.

If a middle school kid found a teacher's nude pic here and spread it around the school would said teacher face negative consequences?

If someone's angry soon to be ex recognized someone...

If some jealous dude saw some other guy had pictures of some chick he knew..

The world really isn't that big and most of us live in or near ski towns and most of us know skiers and mountain bikers and climbers and the like.

It's not a huge stretch.

---

Yes, it fucking is, as evidenced by your multiple “ifs” in the above quote. This whole shitshow is based on a picture you think “ may” be of someone taken surreptitiously, and the hypothetical harm she may suffer “if” someone she knows were to see it on an Internet ski forum.... Get a fucking grip for Christ’s sake.

^^^ Careful. Next thing you know she will be posting how she is awful and worthless and its not her fault and how she should just go away.

And she will, only to return again.

Why would she torture herself like that? Maybe she likes it? No other options for communication?

She doesnt really think she is going to change any minds, does she?


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

Paranoid much ? The cool thing about TGR is it's like a ski house full of rowdy ski bums and weekend warriors. ie. The usual rules don't apply. If ya want PC threads, there's plenny of lame ass ski forums out there. Can't believe this thread is 14 pages. Wtf ?

Sent from my LGMS330 using TGR Forums mobile app

I was just reminiscing about the time when Maggots posted pic's of their Maggete wife's tits and ass,

I liked those days, especially when I knew they lived in Utah, go figure?

You might want to get on this, TGR.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mtngirl79

You might want to get on this, TGR.

---

maybe you should email them directly with a direct link to the post you think is non-consensual
this thread is not doing anything except earning you a reputation as a provacateur

I already reported the post.

I think that thread is outstanding.

It's causing many people to display their true selves.

I'm actually pretty shocked. I did not know it was this bad here.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mtngirl79

I already reported the post.

I think that thread is outstanding.

It's causing many people to display their true selves.

I'm actually pretty shocked. I did not know it was this bad here.

---

So just the report button or an actual email, like ac said?

And by "it" what are you referring to, be specific, none of your usual nonsensical explanations.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mtngirl79

I already reported the post.

---

reporting the post just goes to a mod, afaik, who aren't owners or employees

this is just circling in the forums

report the specific post with your specific issue to the owners

Woah, this chick is melting all OVER the board, huh? Guessing she is an uggo, and is jealous when other women get attention and she does’nt?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by deepsouthmafia

Woah, this chick is melting all OVER the board, huh? Guessing she is an uggo, and is jealous when other women get attention and she does’nt?

---

Yep

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by deepsouthmafia

Woah, this chick is melting all OVER the board, huh? Guessing she is an uggo, and is jealous when other women get attention and she does’nt?

---

you've proven yourself to be a complete dipshit quite aside from this fiasco

do yourself a favor & just stfu

Sad, really. She should try to do something to make herself more attractive/ desireable IMO.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mtngirl79

I already reported the post.

I think that thread is outstanding.

It's causing many people to display their true selves.

I'm actually pretty shocked. I did not know it was this bad here.

---

it's worse than you will ever know. You should leave, NOW. You don't need to kibitz with such scum.
The lotion isn't just for NSFW.
the hose ain't no fun.
don't get hosed, again.
off ya go

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by deepsouthmafia

Sad, really. She should try to do something to make herself more attractive/ desireable IMO.

---

better start deleting

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by acinpdx

better start deleting

---

if she were a guy spouting this BS, she would've been torn to shreds...and hilarity ensues

I’m dangerously close to putting this acinpdx chick on ignore.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by deepsouthmafia

I’m dangerously close to putting this acinpdx chick on ignore.

---

can I be next?

Who said that?
KIDDING.
Your actually one of the good ones, Danno.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by acinpdx

reporting the post just goes to a mod, afaik, who aren't owners or employees

---

this is indeed how this works

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by acinpdx

reporting the post just goes to a mod, afaik, who aren't owners or employees

this is just circling in the forums

report the specific post with your specific issue to the owners

---

You should report it to homeland security and your local authorities, they can scan the Black web for other non consensual photographs and put a stop to it, and bring peace to the victim (s)

What is the end game here? MG wants to out the film company? Feels like some kind of blackmail attempt or crying for attention disguised as advocacy.

What does this "if you don't denounce it you support it" logic accomplish?



Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by regct

What does this "if you don't denounce it you support it" logic accomplish?

---

I think it's typical of modern advocacy in an age of numbness. To get people to care takes shock, so [Issue X] has to be couched in terms of a crisis, a war, an existential threat. You do whatever it takes to abate crises, neutralize threats...so a misleading approach to discourse is nothing compared to the existential consequences of failing to act. Put in that context, Machiavellian tactics seem almost heroic. You do what it takes to avert the threat.

Except the threat was built-up to get peoples' attention. So it's a Munchhausen thing: make it into a crisis, take heroic measures to avert the crisis. It's Bullshit Mountain. Some of us have walked onto that mountain with its maker, grabbed the stones into our virtual hands and pointed out "these aren't stones, they're nuggets of crap", but then the mountain shudders and rumbles and threatens to fracture and bury its maker. "fingers in ears" LA LA LA LA look at that mountain though, what about the CRISIS!

Contrast this with a calmer approach centered on simply understanding concerns, placing them in context, and devising a compromise that benefits the most people for the longest time. It's not a crisis, it's not a threat, it's just imperfect and we need to improve it. Snooze.

The majority opinion is shades of indifference, so the struggle becomes defining what indifference means in terms of this conflict.
In other words: "If you're not with us you're against us" can be viewed two distinct ways here. It's about defining the default position so the many silent parties are seen to align with one side or the other.

1) If you're not actively calling for change, you're supporting bad acts.
or
2) If you're not actively involved in posting and viewing the offending smut, you're not "with" the smut peddlers (lol) and thus you're against them by default.

Neither is accurate, and either device of argument is inherently faulty and childish.

I see this as analogous to, and probably an extension of, general political discourse in this day and age. #sad

ILL

You put some time into that.

I am not sure this particular thread warranted this much effort articulating a popular position.

If you had to type anything it should have been STFU or GTFO.

And look what you just made me do

So if I took a pic of my dick, and then posted that dick pic online, and then I instantly regretted it (pinky dinky), would that make it consensual or not consensual?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by johnnyg82

So if I took a pic of my dick, and then posted that dick pic online, and then I instantly regretted it (pinky dinky), would that make it consensual or not consensual?

---

It would just make you stupid, cuz you know better.

Drinking + Smart phones = A new world where you need to develop a think skin.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ill-advised strategy

...Contrast this with a calmer approach centered on simply understanding concerns, placing them in context, and devising a compromise that benefits the most people for the longest time. It's not a crisis, it's not a threat, it's just imperfect and we need to improve it. Snooze...

---

Nice.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ill-advised strategy

I think it's typical of modern advocacy in an age of numbness. To get people to care takes shock, so [Issue X] has to be couched in terms of a crisis, a war, an existential threat. You do whatever it takes to abate crises, neutralize threats...so a misleading approach to discourse is nothing compared to the existential consequences of failing to act. Put in that context, Machiavellian tactics seem almost heroic. You do what it takes to avert the threat.

Except the threat was built-up to get peoples' attention. So it's a Munchhausen thing: make it into a crisis, take heroic measures to avert the crisis. It's Bullshit Mountain. Some of us have walked onto that mountain with its maker, grabbed the stones into our virtual hands and pointed out "these aren't stones, they're nuggets of crap", but then the mountain shudders and rumbles and threatens to fracture and bury its maker. "fingers in ears" LA LA LA LA look at that mountain though, what about the CRISIS!

Contrast this with a calmer approach centered on simply understanding concerns, placing them in context, and devising a compromise that benefits the most people for the longest time. It's not a crisis, it's not a threat, it's just imperfect and we need to improve it. Snooze.

The majority opinion is shades of indifference, so the struggle becomes defining what indifference means in terms of this conflict.
In other words: "If you're not with us you're against us" can be viewed two distinct ways here. It's about defining the default position so the many silent parties are seen to align with one side or the other.

1) If you're not actively calling for change, you're supporting bad acts.
or
2) If you're not actively involved in posting and viewing the offending smut, you're not "with" the smut peddlers (lol) and thus you're against them by default.

Neither is accurate, and either device of argument is inherently faulty and childish.

I see this as analogous to, and probably an extension of, general political discourse in this day and age. #sad

---

while I would rather not waste anything in this thread,

ill-advised 's post is thoughtful and well-reasoned from my perspective...


given the (social) climate of the past two years, I entirely expect the next (social) war to be a battle between the genders...

' can't we all just get along (?) ' (1992. Rodney King)


skiJ

it's so easy for the boys to agree. why do the girls have to mess it up?

^^^I guess ias' thoughtful post was lost on some people.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Meadow Skipper

^^^I guess ias' thoughtful post was lost on some people.

---

I don't think the words "context", "nuance", "perspective" or
"Dude, get a fuckin grip"
Exist in the Social Justice Warrior Manifesto

Well written yetiman - you have a gift with words.

"Witnesses told responding troopers both the man and woman were naked when they left the vehicle."

http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2017/11/naked_drunken_man_drives_into.html

drunk, naked, driving and fucking with the kid in the backseat. has to be florida or oregon.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wyeaster

drunk, naked, driving and fucking with the kid in the backseat. has to be florida or oregon.

---

Location was in first paragraph. Ya had to read past there to find out there was a kid in the back seat.
You win the long jump to conclusions competition.