Printable View
If living in the bay and just driving up to the mountains, I’d agree that a full on winter tire like a Hakka is probably not the best option. However, there are A/T tires that are much better in the snow/ice than the Falken:Quote:
Originally Posted by optics
https://m.tirerack.com/tires/tests/t...erResultCharts
If you can’t tell the difference between the Falken A/T and a Hakka, maybe you need to recalibrate your sensors, or more likely, spend some more time driving in the snow.
Sigh. This place is so stupid sometimes.Quote:
Originally Posted by J. Barron DeJong
I was reporting my experience with a good option, for multiple uses (highway, sand, trails, snow, ice, etc). Not everyone prays at the altar of tire rack testing. And did you see the dry results in that link?
I would love to spend more time driving in the snow. I have ~30 years behind the wheel, a hell of a lot of 100+ day seasons where I was driving to the hill almost every day (Mt Hood...home to some of the shittiest roads/drivers on the planet in any precip), in shitfuck conditions as often as possible. A few years as a cab driver. A few years in summit county, a few in Montana, a few in the NE. Countless big road trips chasing storms.
So yeah...I guess your baseless "more likely" assessment of what I need can crawl right back up your shithole, from whence it came.
First, apologies, I’ve been in a shitty mood today and that’s coming thru.Quote:
Originally Posted by optics
I wouldn’t say I ‘pray at the alter of Tire Rack’, in fact I don’t believe they do the most thorough testing around, however I do believe in looking at data in addition to anecdotes, and sometime you go with the data that’s available.
However, you said that there may be a marginal difference between the Falken A/T and the Hakka, but that you couldn’t feel it. Data suggests that it’s much more than a marginal difference, and that you should be able to feel it:
Snow braking:
Attachment 437451
Attachment 437452
Ice braking:
Attachment 437454
Attachment 437455
Those are different tests on different vehicles, doesn’t include Hakka, but does include tires that it regularly out performed, but it’s what’s available, and the differences are pretty drastic. And even within the A/T test the difference between tires is more than I’d consider marginal.
The Falken was best in test in wet/dry, but worst in snow. Every tire has trade-off’s (though some are better all around than others), but if the goal is an A/T tire with standout winter performance the Falken isn’t it. It also doesn’t compare to top performing winter tires.
[QUOTE=optics;6746579] (Mt Hood...home to some of the shittiest roads/drivers on the planet in any precip), in shitfuck conditions as often as possible. . [QUOTE=optics;6746579]
If you are missing the fun the green flag is out!
https://instagram.com/the_govy500?igshid=MWI4MTIyMDE=
Yeah, I had a Land Rover LR3 on the Verde's. At the time I was spending a lot of time down in the Bay Area. They were just slightly more than adequate. Really bad in slushy conditions.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bronco
If you live in the mountains full time, I just don't see any reason not to be on dedicated snow tires. What does an insurance claim or crash cost, outside the possibility of being injured or injuring somebody else. I easily get 4 winters from Blizzak's. It works out to about $300/yr.
Let us know. I have run the ATX (pretty good) and now the AT3W (excellent). No experience with the Oupost.Quote:
Originally Posted by snowaddict91
I wonder how the Falken AT3W would look in that test. I have been very pleased with them on my 8k lb truck. Better than K02, ATX, Duratrac. My test criteria is subjective: did I make it down my driveway without dying? Did I make it up my driveway without walking? Do I get more than 25k miles from a set?Quote:
Originally Posted by J. Barron DeJong
They are technically a winter tire, outside of having the severe weather rating, but have a 55k treadwear warranty. The regular Wildpeak is not. Still not a Blizzak, but I need a 125r load index for that vehicle.
Well technically 95mm underfoot was a pow ski for heli skiing... in 1995. Consider the 3PMSF rating for your tire to be the same level of "technically" accurate.Quote:
Originally Posted by SnowMachine
The Goodyear Wrangler SA was extremely similar to the Falken Wildpeak AT Trail... the tread patterns look nearly identical... some say Falken copied Goodyear.
I used to run Wrangler SA as my May through November tire... and they were great AT 3PMSF tires... notably more impressive in snow than the KO2. They were All Weather AT before there was that title, just like KO2. AW AT. They sure kicked the crap out of the terrifying-in-snow stock AT tires just like 95mm skis kicked the crap out of 68mm waist in pow.
Wrangler SAs did decent on snow early season when it was not very cold... but when it got cold they were serviceable-but-mediocre compared to Blizzaks as the rubber hardened.
On ice, my Blizzaks stopped so much faster, maybe 60% the distance of Wranglers or KO2s, and were much more surefooted.
If I was in the bay area, I'd buy Falkens or similar.
Quote:
Originally Posted by J. Barron DeJong
Dude…how bored are you?
Yes. They were “worst of 3”. Those 3 possibly being the “best of 100”.
My point was: even today’s non-winter-specific tires can perform pretty well, well enough for the difference not to be noticeable for a good driver making good decisions.
If you put yourself in a situation where you’re slamming on the brakes on ice and need to stop in less than 15 feet, you’re probably an idiot and should have been going slower or leaving more space.
If your main concern is emergency braking you might do well to up your skills/mindset…the best solution to emergency braking is to not get into a situation where you need to do that. It’s kinda like avy gear…your decision making does play a role.
Also - common sense chiming in here - if you’re in congested enough traffic for a 10–15 foot stopping distance difference to save you, you’re just gonna get hit by the guy behind you when you get that amazing short stop via the tires he doesn’t have.
In my experience, lots of years,I’ve had exactly one emergency braking situation on snow or ice. RIP the turkey.
Welp, I guess the question will remain. Apparently the Outposts are on national backorder in my size, and my local Discount Tire couldn't get a set of AT3Ws in my size anytime soon either. So another set of General ATX it is. Unfortunately I'm in a bind and need tires sooner than later due to multiple flats.Quote:
Originally Posted by SnowMachine
It keeps coming back up in this thread: people chiming in that winter compound tires are better in snow and ice vs all-weather tires. Nobody disagrees with this.
For those who have lots of driving on dry and/or warm condition roads in winter, and also on snow, the all-weather ones (or 3PMSF rated all-terrain tires, if available in the fitment needed for your vehicle) are good choices.
If you look at tires in the parking lot of your local ski area, you'll see all kinds of stuff. Most people don't pay much attention to their tires. We're geeking out about them here.
It gets tedious, donit? I mean, read the thread title.Quote:
Originally Posted by El Chupacabra
Yep, ffs.Quote:
For those who have lots of driving on dry and/or warm condition roads in winter, and also on snow, the all-weather ones (or 3PMSF rated all-terrain tires, if available in the fitment needed for your vehicle) are good choices.
Directed mainly at optic, but really everyone in general:
I’ve had an unhealthy obsession with tires for like 30 years, so yep, I geek out on this stuff.
My assumption is that if someone is wondering about all-weather tires vs winter, then they care about performance in snow or ice.
So, recommending a tire that performs poorly compared to the rest of it’s class in snow/ice seems unhelpful.
Saying that there’s no discernible difference between that poorly performing A/T tire and a true winter tire seems unhelpful.
I grew up in Canada and my parents never put winter tires on their cars until us kids were driving - and more precisely, after my brother flipped the car end over end.
The were driving on all-seasons, in the 80’s, which would suck compared to todays all-season/all-weather tires. And they managed to never have so much as a fender bender while doing it.
So yes, it possible to use worse tires and just be extra cautious. Is that all everyone coming into this thread is hoping to hear?
I think the simpler thought is that modern tires are fairly refined to the point where usually there are only minor differences between models WITHIN tire classes such that price is the better decider.
The difference BETWEEN tire classes is still remarkably stark, so snow tires still massively outperform all weather. Studs are remarkably better on ice than studless. Can all weather get you by in snow, usually! Can studless get you by in ice, usually! Are true snows (and AT) typically worse at hydroplaning than all weather/season, usually! Are real winter compound tires always going to perform worse and wear faster than all weather/AT, absolutely on dry pavement above 40/50F.
The right tool is always going to be significantly to massively better in intended conditions.
Well said. We have a car with cheap snow tires, a van with Blizzaks, and a truck with 3pmsf all terrains.Quote:
Originally Posted by summit
Are the Blizzaks slightly better than the cheap snow tires, probably. But in the real world there isn't much difference.
And of course the snow tired vehicles perform better than the truck with all terrains. But to say the truck with all terrains isn't safe to drive in the snow would be silly.
Anyone here running Arctic Claw WXI's? Did a search of this thread and didn't find any results. I live somewhere where I drive on snow for 4+ months of the year so going full dedicated snows for the first time in a while. For my f150 w/20" rims I was quoted about $300 less than Blizzaks and they seem to be decently reviewed.
Wrong thread, jong.Quote:
Originally Posted by ASmileyFace
https://www.tetongravity.com/forums/...ecommendations
I knew there was a winter tire thread... but of course it's in the forum I never check.Quote:
Originally Posted by Meadow Skipper
Thanks
Agreed. Wife has top end Hakkas on her CR-V and I have General Grabber Arctics on my Tacoma. If there is a difference, I can't tell, and I can tell an immediate difference between summer and winter tires on both in the snow.Quote:
Originally Posted by snowaddict91
Any good sales? Gotta take off the studs...
Quote:
Originally Posted by summit
Save $110 This Weekend!
Discount Tire Direct
I think I saw 150 off Michelin at Costco
In 44 years of driving it's only the last decade that I've gone with newer soft compound tires like Xice or Blizzak. Since the late 70s we alway put 4 meaty winter truck tires on our cars. We alway went with as soft and as cheap as possible and never had an issue. The only trade of was noise and performed but I never drove faster than 80 mph on the Hwy in the winter.
Now I have the Grabber APT on my Outback and left them on this winter. I was pleasantly surprised. The only major difference was stopping on ice and my Blizzak DMV2 were only missed on a few days. Mind you those days I didn't have to go far. If I did I would've peered to have the Blizzaks on otherwise I'm kinda sold on All Weather tires. If they make an AWT that stops as well aa an Xice or Blizzak that tire will sell like hotcakes. Not sure it could happen but you never know.
The Grabber Arctic isn't a cheap snow tire; it's in a very similar price and performance class to the Hakka. I wouldn't be surprised if a truly cheap snow tire was still pretty good, though, as so many tires now are a lot better than the best of a couple decades ago.Quote:
Originally Posted by zion zig zag
Hakas off and these on
https://www.mazamatires.com/tires/ba...in/523530.html
It’s been a good tire the last three years. It is wearing a bit faster than a dedicated summer tire because it is triple peak snowflake but not too fast. It will probably be good for this season and again next year.
I would chain it up if Timberline Road was pure ices, but otherwise it handles spring snow and slush well.
It has also handled well in ponded up road surfaces and it it even decent for towing