Cody, what’s the truck camper you use? Can’t find it for the life of me! Extra
Insulation for cold weather added?
Thanks man!
Printable View
Cody, what’s the truck camper you use? Can’t find it for the life of me! Extra
Insulation for cold weather added?
Thanks man!
Thanks man! When I did I search I found them. Looks solid. Mentions best camper for decent weather. Was wondering about winter ski lot stuff!
Cheers and thanks again.
I'd say it's pretty damn solid for winter. Two things I primarily like about it in the winter for such a minimal camper set up is that I don't have to get out of the cab to get dressed, pack, cook, etc...all with full standing room. The second part is that with a Little Buddy heater, it heats up so damn quickly in there. I only will turn it on to dry stuff and in the morning while cooking but it get straight up hot in there. It's a nice feature to have for what is essentially a super plush tent camper. The only thing that's been an issue...that's an issue with pretty much all winter camper set ups...is condensation. The vents definitely open up enough and I've found where they need to be to create some cross ventilation. Only thing is if it's in a gnarly storm you couldn't really open the vents enough. I plan to mod it and add a battery powered fan in the roof and then I think I'll be super golden. But all in all, I love the thing. So well built super light weight, minimal air drag, holds everything I need and is really comfortable. 11/10 would buy again.
Get a fantastic fan and monetize. $$$
Sucks for go fast. I seen lots of look alikes popping up on the web. They came up with the idea and others are capitalizing. I hope to own a go fast someday.
Sent from my Pixel 2 using TGR Forums mobile app
Thanks guys and Cody! Ugh. Wait till 2020 to start the build! YIKES. Might pull the trigger on a FWC instead! Cheers fellas and see ya out there!
Wednesday hurry tf up already
Sent from my H3223 using Tapatalk
Wednesday did it's part.
Just saw Gaffney post about doing Shasta w Cody for the 50. Really looking forward to seeing that one
Cody just posted there will be no episode today but stay tuned
What a great series! Thanks Cody (and crew) looking very forward to the next. Your commentary is highly entertaining and educational. Superb work!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-C25wGswf4
ski stuff on hold
go outside and play
I just watched the first 10 minutes. As a former USFS permit admin, I’m glad Cody addresses the film permit and drone usage questions.
Awesome stuff Cody. Very much looking forward to your projects continuation. Props🍻
since everyone seems to want to watch Cody get his drink on (plus the pornstache)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiN1fkWjW5k
sufferfest should have a series of beer named after the types of fun
IPA, DIPA, and a Triple for Type 3
I thought it was interesting that he was able to classify this as non-commercial without advertisements, when there is certainly a lot of sponsor placement (eg the giant Swatch sticker visible on 3 skis in this segment). Since this is your bailiwick, what are your thoughts on this?
Cool closing episode!
Is that a Storm Chaser I see in the background and if so are you gonna try to ride it? :wink:
Guessing, but I'd wager that mikeyb was just glad that Cody emphasized going through the proper permitting process before filming and (maybe mostly) NOT flying drones where you are not supposed to.
As for the legal argument, here's the USFS definition of commercial filming: "Commercial filming is defined as use of motion picture, videotaping, sound-recording, or any other type of moving image or audio recording equipment on National Forest System lands that involves the advertisement of a product or service, the creation of a product for sale, and/or the use of actors, models, sets, or props, but not including activities associated with broadcasting breaking news. For purposes of this definition, creation of a product for sale includes a film, videotape, television broadcast, or documentary of historic events, wildlife, natural events, features, subjects or participants in a sporting or recreation event, and so forth, when created for the purpose of generating income (FSH 2709.11 2008-2 (CH 40))."
That leaves a lot of interpretation to the permit administrator(s)...and they just need to convince those folks. I like the work-around they came up with. Unlike Dav's film, for which they did not get permits before filming AND (more importantly) the film was made to be sold, this video is just made to be shared and not sold. Nifty.
Dav's story: https://www.wildsnow.com/519/us-fore...teeners-movie/
Also, I’m not sure, but I suspect Cody’s garage isn’t in a national park.
I suspect Cody's garage is freezing cold. It's mid June, and he's still wearing a hood.
Thanks for the great explanation. Just another example of laws not keeping with technology. Not sure about the shared vs sold argument. Shared in my book is the same as sold. Think about it, if I went 30 years ago to a national park with a camcorder, filmed a “movie” and “sold” it to my friends I wouldn’t need a permit. This is the equivalent to me sharing my video or movie with a few friends. Now, if I am a you tuber with 5 million subscribers and come to a National Park with a film crew to “share” my trip, then according to your logic I don’t need a permit. Never mind that the video gets 10 million views and makes $30k which gets paid to my LLC.
Rad but damn I
Was hoping for Shasta bonus footage