Printable View
My UL gpo veneer will remain with me until they get hung on the wall. Absolutely amazing skis.
I hope that the smaller builders all settle into a solid and lasting place in the industry, it's such a great alternative to big brands, if you know what you want and appreciate the quality.
Sent from my SM-G960U using TGR Forums mobile app
I liked the S7 then the squad the the BG. I laugh every time I see someone grab an air tip S7. That’s an example of tweaking a design in a terrible way. But they sell a lot to the masses. It’s gotta be tough when you know how to build good skis but people just buy the gimmicky mass produced and then wonder why their tips fold on them and they can’t keep up.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
I absolutely love my custom carbon/nylon GPO’s. Mounted -1. The new Lhasa fats are pretty great as well. I think I’ll be keeping both of those. Do wish I had bought my GPO a little shorter...they’d have AT bindings on them if I had.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
Doesn't matter, you would have sold them by now anyways.... [emoji1]Quote:
Originally Posted by The Artist Formerly Known as Leavenworth Skier
Lots of stuff to comment on, but Keith’s mentioned a number of times in the past he never set out to make a lot of money. He makes skis because he enjoys it and he enjoys making the best skis he can for himself and his customers. TGR is pretty much his target consumer group, because a lot of us do care about core, flex, graphic, veneer, carbon changes and know enough to choose that + the model that suits them. My Quixote’s in a heavy/carbon/veneer layup are my favorite resort ski. That would not be true in enduro/nylon layup. But for someone else the opposite might be true.
As everyone is well aware Keith has always bent over backwards to try and give his customers exactly what they want, and at pretty insane prices. Full custom skis from other companies costs $1k plus, even partial customs (ie different top sheet graphic ON3P) cost $900+
Most of us have been getting full customs from Keith for ~$500 or less with referrals and discount codes during his sales. Doesn’t surprise me it hasn’t ultimately been sustainable, but I’m pretty thankful I got the custom skis I did at those prices.
The comments about top sheet graphics surprise me, I can’t imagine there isn’t a graphic in the library that could suit pretty much any person’s tastes. I think a lot of them are way better looking than 90% of the skis out there, besides a few (Moment, some ON3P come to mind, though I also really dislike some of those companies topsheet designs currently). Course I also strongly dislike some of Praxis graphics. Veneer obviously are dope. But to each their own.
Unfortunately to keep the doors open I think at anything other than a very small scale you have to tap into the mainstream market to survive. Moment, ON3P, even Icelantic have done so by partnering with big online shops (Backcountry, Evo) and some bigger chain stores. Blister and some of the other review sites like outdoor gear lab also provide a lot of publicity to skiers like the TGR crowd who just don’t happen to be on online forums.
-Personally I think the best way forward would be to focus on a core lineup (2 touring skis, 1-2 park, 2 all mountain, 1 big mountain, 1 or 2 freeride, protests). Only offer them in the layup and flex that makes sense and a crowd pleasing graphic. Maybe with veneer as a brand distinguisher.
I think trying to focus on making some park skis and getting some talented athletes to rep them could be a great idea too. I think that’s helped ON3P a ton- the park market is pretty big and populated by young guys who will bother to look up stuff online rather than just walk into the local shop. Keith’s skis are some of/the most durable I’ve owned and would really have and edge (ha!) over the big brands in that department for park.
-Offer standard lineup skis for sale in local shops, try to partner with online stores and big chains. May take a few seasons.
-Send a bunch of stock skis out for reviews at blister, other online sites. Go to SIA. Some ski magazines would be good but I’m sure big $$$.
-Offer custom ski runs in the off seasons at full price ~$900. That’s what they’re worth IMO. Maybe with limited options. Perhaps offer custom run/experimental skis when a group gets together like we did on the Lhasa’s and 192 protests
My .02 - Regardless I will always support Kieth however he’s making skis. My custom Veneer protests, custom veneer Quixote’s, and veneer Lhasa pow fat collabs, and presumably my new custom veneer piste jibs can only be pried out of my cold dead hands.
I’ve had and enjoyed OG protests, powderboards, gpos, and concepts as well. I regret selling the concepts - ski does not get as much love as it should. Pretty perfect one ski quiver IMO.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
I’m 2 for 4 for buying and keeping Praxis skis, both of the skis I’m keeping were custom. I was woefully under prepared to build custom skis and Keith helped a ton. What I didn’t realize is that all I really wanted was custom top sheets and bases. The Super Freerides took forever to figure out, multiple detunes, multiple remounts, and they now are good for me, but it shouldn’t take that long. I tried to sell them multiple times, and it would of saved me a bunch if work and effort. Similar story with my Protests.
It’s a cool idea, but the long term viability is tough. I wish Keith the best, and if we get another shot at custom orders, I’ll be in for another pair, but it’s a tough road.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
fwiw custom orders still being taken at praxis, just the link is lower on the page...
Just a thought, but i think that Praxis (or any "boutique" brand) should have a signature aesthetic feature that appears on all skis the same way that moment has squared off tips and tails. Its free marketing and always gets asked about on chairlifts or in lift lines. It could be as simple as a all skis having a bright orange base, or all skis having a built in carry system (thatll apeal to the rich folk out there), All skis have a variation of veneer topsheets, etc.
Its easy to get lost in the hordes of other skis out there if your skis look exactly the same as everyone elses (at least to the untrained eye), and then you have to rely on word of mouth from notoriously tight lipped core bros who only buy at bro discount, and the odd dentist who buys at full retail. To stand out as the little guy, it really helps to have a big budget, or a defining aesthetic feature IMO.
But then again, who said that these small shops want to grow into producing 10,000+ pairs of skis per year. Im just happy that i finally scooped a pair of protests this fall before they were all gone.
Maybe their signature aesthetic should be pink? This is so random, but maybe helps Praxis blow up on the gram https://instagram.com/p/B4k5uDPlBKB/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Supergoat had 2 preorder cycles w/ premade customs in stock most of the last 2 seasons. Looks like SG is also still available on website for $799. Must have sold enough that there has been rumblings of a MegaGoat possibility.Quote:
Originally Posted by galibier_numero_un
Could play off the vocallocalbro thing and throw a "PNW Grown", "ColoRadBro", etc regional branding on the tips and tails.Quote:
Originally Posted by PlayItLeo
Actually, heres a good one: put full song lyrics on the tails so that people behind you have something to read in the liftlines and would get them singing/humming. I think people would find that pretty cool. Def some copyright issues with that, but that would be pretty interesting. Could easily market to different demographics with that one.
Assume y'all have seen this new experimental ski now for order: https://www.praxisskis.com/experimen...tal-184-94-18/
Anyone gonna get one? Sounds intriguing. I'd like that design/layup in 187, 104 underfoot, with a touch more tail rocker. Please and thanks!
I bet the next experimental is a big mountain ski.
I hope Praxis figures out this next phase, because their good skis are superlative.
Yup, seems as if Scott can generate a bit more demand for a batch like this than Keith can (for whatever reason).Quote:
Originally Posted by tuco
One could argue that the Lhasa run was a PM gear thing and not a Praxis thing, which would leave only the Wootest 1.0/2.0 (which is still remarkable).
I wonder if the relative reluctance to put together a run of some sort of Praxis missile here is merely a numbers game (ON3P having a larger pool to draw from), ON3P's reputation for chargers, or something else (FUD about the end result, for example)?.
... Thom
Not to beat a dead horse here but: What brings home the bacon for ON3P is Jeffreys and Magnus', where BGs seem fairly steadily in demand too. I remember Iggy stating that four models took up the majority of their sales. I have no idea what those skis are for Praxis, but they sure as hell are not Protests :)
I also agree with the points raised concerning both graphics and that signature design on their skis could be helpful. Not to keep bringing up ON3P, but Iggy mentioned that the green ON3P bases was one of the better moves they made in terms of brand recognition (thanks Apple).
Also, in terms of gaphics - go conservative for the skis that you want to sell the most of. Most of Praxis' offerings this year might look stellar for the right person, but the less busy designs are for sure the most likely to appeal to lots of people. The touring range look fantastic imho, while a lot of the other skis are probably a bit more polarizing. After looking more closely at the range I too think a lot of them actually look pretty damned good - the 9D for one look amazing. I mean
Attachment 301484
I am unsure how long it would take for me to grow tired of it, and the second hand value would prob be very low - but damned they look good. A Protest with that graphic is pretty enticing :) I have not noticed how good this design looks before tonight having just spotted the UFO and though wtf? I sincerly doubt that that most 40+ males will ski on a ski with that graphic though, though I could be wrong.
The ON3P/Moment formula of strategic presence in certain shops + online sales as the main revenue channel seems to work for them. Perhaps by offering less choices, tidying up the graphics department a bit and by organizing the range in more easily understood ski segments could generate more sales.
Both ON3P and Moment's range are really easy to understand. For instance ON3P:
- park: different widths (dw) of a design concept with underfoot detuning
- freestyle: different widths of a design concept that prefer a centered stance
- all mountain: different widths of a design concept that can be used with a centered stance or driven from the shovels
- freeride: different widths of a design concept that prefer to be driven
- powder: different widths, similar design
Yeah, I took ON3P a long time to get there, but the range makes a ton of sense and is very, very easy to understand with a minimum of explanation. The same can be said for Moment's - that is, their range is even easier to understand. With Praxis, well - sorting them according to width just adds to the confusion for me. Understanding the range takes a bit more for the outsider, while most Praxis fans probably understand it a lot more easily than I do.
Anyway, while my first outing on these was not a great success, I still think they are perhaps the nicest looking skis I have ever seen in person. Sorry to post them yet again.
Attachment 301486
And yes - the sale is back on for those that missed out above. So good for us, not so good for Praxis. This should be the time of year when they sell the most skis no? I hope they will be able to pull through. These sales must wreck havoc on their margins, even if they are able to shift stock.
sorry to be long winded, especially as I seem to remember people mentioning that Keith doesn't frequent TGR ;)
I fully endorse this statement.Quote:
Originally Posted by Muggydude
cheers,
john (and all the best to Keith moving forward)
For all of you who have wanted to try a skinny Protest.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Praxis-Prot...0AAOSws41dxajA
Those are on KSL as wellQuote:
Originally Posted by travel_to_ski
Daaaaaamn, that’s a burl ass build! Don’t know if that makes a lot of since to me but quite the find for sure!
Bet theyre awesome
Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app
Little e-mail from Keith and crew:
Renovation Sale Phase 2
ALL SKIS 40% OFF
To test the waters on this new approach, of great skis at great prices sold factory direct at wholesale pricing. We are discounting all inventory by 40%, that’s right, wholesale pricing direct to the skier, shipped from the factory with a little saw dust in every box. I don’t know, maybe you’d rather pay more? Or get less? We just can’t be sure anymore… so we are going to test out this new pricing from now until CYBER MONDAY.
Go get 'em!!
I was happy to read in that email, that there is still hope for a revised version of the custom build approach. With all potential caveats, e.g. (-10, +10 might not work, you might build it too soft, too stiff, topsheet is not what you hoped blah, blah) I still find it so much fun. It changed my whole perspective on what it meant to buy skis. I've been lucky with my builds, e.g. never bought something I didn't enjoy and over the years, I've learned a lot about how flex and width and materials impact a ski feel. I am definitely much more educated.
Secondly I think Thom mentioned it back a page or two, but I really like the idea of focusing on building and testing slight tweaks to a fewer number of the raddest shapes at different waist widths (a little more like ON3P. It would take a lot of the guinea pig stress off the customer, and give you piece of mind that whatever miner tweaks that were required to a move a shape into a different waist width were addressed.
As far as marketing/classifying the skis another route that might work is classifying the skis the way a lot of us do for our quivers, e.g. New Snow, Day after, Hard Days, Tour e.g
Storms Days: Protest 128, Quixote 116, GPO 116 . Concept 116
Day or Two After: GPO 108, Quixote 108, Concept 108, Piste Jib 109
Harder Days: Piste Jib 99, 9D8. SnD, Park n Ride
Tour: Protest Tour 118, Backcountry, Yeti, EXP
Anyways just some thoughts. Hope Praxis pulls through this time. They've had a huge impact on my snow sliding activities
Considering a 3 ski quiver from Praxis and wanted to ask for advice. I originally was considering On3p, but Praxis appeals to me a little more.
Average skier, came to it too late in life, ski at Targhee and Jackson, aspiring to start skiing backcountry. 5'11" 200lbs (fat trying to get back to athletic.)
Hoping those with more knowledge of the skis could help me with the following that I am considering-
Firm Days/between storms/skiing with the better half- trying to decide between the MVP on 9D8's
Storm Days/Day or two after- GPO
Pow skis- Protest
Also, looking at either Pivots (if budget allows) or STH2's for bindings, or would it be worth splurging on shifts for either the MVP's or GPO's? (likelihood of touring much is slim so probably 80/20 at best).
Truly firm days or groomer days: 9d8 > MVP
I've owned both.
+1, MVP is much better on a medium pow day/1-2 days after. for groomers/hardpack, go with the 9D8 or a Piste Jib if you like Playful.
Or actually that new Experimental ski looks pretty badass as the skinny spot in your quiver!