Yeah I did on my Mfree and it makes it so easy to slide in the pow Edges are useless in powder
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
Printable View
Yeah I did on my Mfree and it makes it so easy to slide in the pow Edges are useless in powder
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
Useless as in neutral - sure. But I've skied 3.0/0.5 on powder and it did not seem to have a negative effect. Perhaps on a <80 mm carver in powder, but I'm not sure you could separate the primary issue of the narrow waist away from the possible effect of sharp tips and tails I couldn't). De-tune if it makes you happy. I like having fully tuned edges for the mostly harder snow I'm on.
I don't see how sharp edges make any difference in a foot of pow.Quote:
Originally Posted by waxoff
But if there's scraped off or groomer back to the chair, then sharp edges on a pow ski can be useful.
Do you guys really get more aggressive than gummy stone along the rocker? Do some of you really not do that?!
I ski roughly eighty percent powder so I’m willing to give up groomer for loose on pow
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
And you don’t turn, so I guess edges don’t matter that case.Quote:
Originally Posted by whyturn
I go full file on the part of the ski that will never touch hard snow. I taper that down into the contact points where I'll just run a gummi stone. The rest of the ski I leave sharp.
I'll be honest, a few weeks in and my daily drivers are dull until they get a base grind and full tune. I ride over so many rocks that deburring the edges effectively detunes the whole ski. Its just part of skiing where I ski. The racers here would be horrified.
I have 1 set of skis that I keep sharp (between contact points) and won't ride into those zones. Those are for truly icy days.
I've skied both Line and Atomic with the boat tips/tails (convex). They're super surfy in pow. You just don't need edges up there.
Deburring your edges shouldn't dull them. I think you might be doing it wrong.
reading this thread I thought it was July for a moment
Yes, but gummies are not 'aggressive' enough:FIREdevil:Quote:
Originally Posted by stuckathuntermtn
https://www.slidewright.com/Edges/flap-disk-tips.jpg
(PO'd post ACL surgery 'tip detuning'. Ski tip caught a submerged log.)
You definitely do not want to have anything close to sharp edges around tips & tails and then ease the edge to contact points. From there, I do not automatically detune from contact point until I feel the skis on the snow. Then use a pocket stone (or gummy) and work a little section at a time until it feels right.
Guess I’ll try once more…. Detune strategies are great. Lots of good comments here about that. None of it useful for me personally because I prefer a long ski that’s sharp from tip to tail. That’s all beside the point though.
I’m just asking why. You and I ski the same ski in the same length on the same run in the same conditions at the same speed. You can assume you did it in a more rad way than me if that helps. You detune a few inches past the contact points, I sharpen everything I can see, both of us are happy, why? Does one of us lean back? Does one of us unweight differently? Does one of us have more leverage over the ski due to height/weight? Does one of us lead or steer differently? Does one of us have softer boots?
Not looking for anything precise, this is just one of those things I’ve never been able to theorize on in a way that feels confident.
This is interesting. Do you think a sharp tip and/or tail makes it easier or harder to bend the ski into an arc? I sort of wonder whether extra leverage helps you bend the middle of the ski, leading to the unintuitive (but anecdotally borne out in my own experience) conclusion that a long stiff ski can be easier to arc than a short stiff ski.Quote:
Originally Posted by stealurface831
the ski releases out of the turn easier and has less of an "on-off" edge feel.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mustonen
Right. I get the concept. But is it only that some of us like it rough and fast and some of us want candlelight and a bottle of wine?Quote:
Originally Posted by scratchskier321
I like having some edge I can use, but I absolutely hate anything that makes a ski feel more grabby than I feel like it should. Even in New England.
My reckoner 112 were borderline unskiable until I put them through 4 or 5 sessions of progressively more detune, and now they are amazing.
Sent from my Pixel 8 using Tapatalk
Different strokes for different folks
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
Yeah, I pretty much never detune.
It's not the deburring.... It's the dragging them across rocks.Quote:
Originally Posted by stuckathuntermtn
Reading. You may be doing it wrong.
You have some HL skis right?Quote:
Originally Posted by pfluffenmeister
They are definitely detuned.
Sent from my Pixel 8 using Tapatalk
I like to be able to break the ski free from its turn if needed. I want to steer the ski instead of it steering me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mustonen
So are you suggesting it’s my superior ability to break a ski free from its turn that explains the difference between us?Quote:
Originally Posted by scratchskier321
I think it comes down to where you ski and how you ski. Low moisture content snow (in my experience) doesn’t really matter what tune your ski has. But you really notice it in high moisture snow
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mustonen
Id say yeah, that's pretty much it.
Detuning is fine tuning.
No, it’s my ability to ski faster and with more aplomb that allows me to get some edge out of a more dull tune. PowerrrrrrQuote:
Originally Posted by Mustonen
And what LVS and Djongo said.