What is telling here is that a group of people who have radically different views ALL feel this a terrible, dangerous and revolting ruling. What the fuck is the court doing???
Printable View
What is telling here is that a group of people who have radically different views ALL feel this a terrible, dangerous and revolting ruling. What the fuck is the court doing???
Poor example.Quote:
Originally Posted by mr_gyptian
1) public housing is not owned by the occupants (it would be different if they were co-ops)
2) Cabrini was part of a larger plan to tear down the vertical slums that perpetuate generations of poverty, and replace them with scattered site housing. Actually, last I heard, this was a pretty good thing (particularly for the sketchy developments along south lakeshore drive). The Cabrini land grab redevelopment was just an extra bonus for the urban yuppies.