I dunno...it is a junior race bindingQuote:
Originally Posted by Knut
Printable View
I dunno...it is a junior race bindingQuote:
Originally Posted by Knut
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alpinord
Fritchi Daimir Vipec Template for Regular and Demo Heel. (Unverified)Quote:
Originally Posted by acinpdx
Sweet, thanks guys.
Measured with a digital caliper off of a Fritchi Daimir jig. Hole spacing measurements confirmed with Knut's template. Then pasted front and rear hole pattern on Jondrums' template and set spacing to boot center. Measured for different size BSLs and confirmed with the template. As always, do a test mount on a 2x4 first before drilling your skis.
Does anyone have pdf for Radical 2.0?
nuthin to do with templates and I really donoght give a fk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wi4N4duxwgk
Take this for a whirl. Please let me know how it goes after a test mount.Quote:
Originally Posted by j0z77
http://www.slidewright.com/Bindings/..._radical_2.jpg
hey all - I'm back around the forums after some time off. Anyone care to summarize what needs work in this thread?
..I have a kids binding laying around, Tyrol Peak 4.5, and no luck googling a template for it.
Save my son from skiing on dad on beer eyeballed bindings - any idea what template might be compatible? Shop, Head and interwebz did not help..
Thank you. I'll test and report.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alpinord
I would say the biggest thing is templates for the newer bindings on the market are needed.Quote:
Originally Posted by jondrums
-Marker Kingpin
-Dynafit Beast
-Dynafit Radical 2.0
-Salomon STH2
-Salomon Warden
-G3 Ion
Probably some others I'm forgetting.
Some of these have been made by other people (Terry @ Slidewright, or Knut) but regardless of whose templates are used, links should be posted in the first post of the thread.
Thanks Jon!
First, thanks and lauds for establishing this resource.Quote:
Originally Posted by jondrums
The hole pattern on most (maybe all but Beast?) 4-screw rear Dynafit bindings are the same, but the fore-aft position varies from binding to binding a few mms. I deal with this by first mounting the toe binding, then putting the boot in the toe and marking the ski at the back of the boot heel, then mounting the heel with reference to the boot heel position. (This puts the rear binding smack in the middle of the fore-aft adjustment range.) To do that, I have added a line on my heel binding template that represents the back of boot heel position. (Does my description make sense?) Adding a back o' boot heel line on Dynafit binding templates might be nice.
That's a cool idea. Mind sharing where that line is in reference to the 4 holes? Have you done the math to get the line in exactly the right spot - in other words, should I add what you've done to the template?Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Steve
If anyone can post links to these templates, I'll add them to the first page. I don't have time to search through the thread just yet, maybe in a few days.Quote:
Originally Posted by adrenalated
See Radical 2.0 template above (and G3 ION, below) as a heel line example and template links. I can provide measurements for heel locations relative to the Jigrex plates we have in stock if needed.Quote:
Originally Posted by jondrums
G3 ION template:
http://www.slidewright.com/Bindings/G3_ION_Template.jpg
Is the boot sole length off for Radical FT's? My test mount has to be all the way forward to just reach.
I ended up mounting at 303 for a 313mm boot and it landed right in the middle. Maybe it has to do with the dumb FT plate.
I'm looking for a template for the Plum Race 165/170. Anyone got anything? I've spent the better part of an hour on the google machine and I've got nothing so far.
Use Dynafit Vertical toe pattern to mount toe. Insert boot into toe, lock toe, push heelpiece onto heel with something in the gap, drop heel to ski, mark heel holes, have a beer, drill and mount.
Thanks BL. That's what I was planning on but Jonathan S came through and sent me a template. Good bunch of folks here. PS - is there room in your ride out to SLC for Gordycamp for 1 more? I'm loosely contemplating going...
Just curious if there's still some M5 small-heads with a 20mm length in the works for this season? The new pozi-drive hardware is quite stellar; a big +1 over the old socket-head screws, and I'd be pumped to see some come through in that length. If not where are you guys sourcing screws to mount STH2 toes from? I have at least 2 pairs of skis I'd like to mount up with STH2's, and even more in the somewhat near future.
I was able to find some M5 oval-heads in a 20mm length at a local hardware store but they're zinc plated plain steel. Terrifyingly soft material, and even though I'm not a big guy I'm not very confident in them.
We might have some miscellaneous lengths of M5 stainless steel philips flatheads. I can check tomorrow.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ninetyfour
Does the kingpin rental use the same pattern as 'standard' kingpin? If not, does anybody have a template for kingpin rental?Quote:
Originally Posted by asylstrasse
Guys, please tell me your opinion:
I have several skis and all of them have mounted FKS/Pivot 14 bindings for BSL 317mm.
In all cases installation of bindings was made in ski-service of shops (large specialized ski-shops) where I bought skis.
This winter I ski on Chetler's with Pivot 14, everything is perfect, but when I closely look on bindings I found that metal adjustable bars on the heel have little different lenght on the left and on the right sides of them.
Some my other skis also have this effect but in smaller size and some skis haven't it. On all skis riding is perfect! :)
1) Why I have this issue? Why ski-master leave adjustment in this non symmetric position?
2) This is normal situation or no?
3) What affect I can get from this situation on my bindings/boots/skis/riding?
4) Do I need to correct this in ski-service?
Thanks in advance for replies!
See pic:
http://i843.photobucket.com/albums/z...ps6fdo4sq8.jpg
^^^this a known problem with the 14's. Just go by 18's and it will be solved. Or just turn din down to 4. I think the line 14 branded don't have that issue. But I'm not positive since I only use the 18
lol, this reply for me?Quote:
Originally Posted by whyturn
if yes, is it joke? ))
as I know 18-din models have the same adjustable bars in the heel
Yes it is a joke. Read about bars in your manual. It explains this in detail
Anyone have a resource for a beast 16 template? There's one for Stockholm reviews but I'm either MR or it's not scaled correctly.
Thanks for reply, now everything is clear with these bars and I have another question:
If FKS/Pivot 14 are correctly adjusted for current boots/BSL is it normal that ski-brakes have some movement (very little lift up and down) when skier try to move boot/heel up and down (of course when foots with boots are set in bindings)?
Hello all I just purchased the Look SPX 12 fluid bindings. I am wondering if anyone knows if these match a template on here. I thought maybe the Look axial2, but not sure.
Also How difficult is the mounting process. I have never done it, but am looking to start mounting and waxing my own skis. I have worked as a carpenters hand for a few summers and am quite capable with tools. Just wondering if it's a task I can tackle or not worth risking my new skis and bindings? Any help or advise would be great!
Thanks in advance
They are the same than the new axial3. Which are different than the axial2, if I'm not mistaken.Quote:
Originally Posted by sdsimo3
I yet haven't mounted one of those myself, and I am not aware of an existing template
You should have no difficulties, then. Given the right choice of mounting beverage, that is.Quote:
Originally Posted by sdsimo3
This worked perfectly. Thanks Terry! I owe you beer/brown liquor:Quote:
Originally Posted by Alpinord
http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n...pskmrqyzju.jpg
Good to know. I'll get down there for a beer one of these days. Nice color coordination. :wink:
Guys, If ski-master found that screws that mount bindings to skis (heel pieces in my case) not tighten enough (they were mounted 2 years ago in shop where I bought it) and he little tight it now it is right decision?
Can it damage the waterproof in holes/screws?
It is usual practice in ski-service to tight screws if found that they are not tight properly?
Do I need to check toe-pieces and also little tight it if it is possible?
Thanks in advance for replies!
This is probably already answered somewhere... but do the Speed Turn 2.0 and Speed Radical share the same heel hole pattern?
Specifically, I am trying to fit into a heelpiece drilled with inserts for Speed Radicals, can I use a Speed Turn 2.0 binding?
Struggling to find a mount template for the warden mnc demo. Anybody have a link?
I was looking for a sth2 wtr template today and found one on this page. http://www.slidewright.com/ski-bindi...to-powderguide I will mount it up tomorrow on a 2X4 to make sure before drilling my new skis.Quote:
Originally Posted by jondrums
Edit to add, this template did was waaaay short on the boot center measurement, so if you use it, mount to a 2X4 first to be sure you have it correct. I mean, I guess I could have fucked up, but I don't think so.
Thanks tBatt for the template. Just mounted a pair of Vipecs and it was spot on.
BTW, the template on Slidwright and Powderguide is not correct at this time. (3/25/2016).
The Radical 2.0 template worked great, thanks!Quote:
Originally Posted by Alpinord
I'm mounting up a new pair of dps 112 rpc with solly 900 and dalbello krypton pros. During the process I've noticed that the boot mark is @ 5 mm back from the measured center . I'm not sure if this is an error on dalbellos part or if for some esoteric reason they want me to use that point . If anyone has encountered this issue I would greatly appreciate any input
^^^^^^ Uh never mind .I folded the paper the wrong way:redface::redface::redface:
Anyone know where to find templates for a tyrolia attack 13 demo or a rossignol axial 3?