I agree. Buying a repainted E30 M3 w/75K for $60K certainly requires a belief in a greater fool. Too many TV shows where guys are playing this game.
Printable View
I would be shocked if there is money from reputable private equity firms chasing metal as an "investment" these days.
I think there is a substantial amount of dumb money from individuals, though. Certainly plenty of folks looking for a greater fool rather than something that makes sense to drive. Some of the posts in this thread are evidence enough of that.
Cool M3. Shame we all don't hang onto the cars of our youth.
I think you're underestimating the Trans-Am. It came with a 6 pack of Coors cans and this guy was featured in an instructional video for the car.
http://jameskwalker.co.uk/blog/wp-co...t-II-SPL-2.jpg
I'm going to hang onto my golf r until Gen Z turns 50 and somebody buys it off me for $750,000.
The E90 M3 has a decent chance of being worth something. They already hold value pretty well.
That would've also meant keeping the car perfect for another 2 decades. In order to make an extra 40k, or 2k per year.
The market has already corrected itself over the last few months. Great time to buy a 458 Speciale, if you want to make 400k over the next 5 years.
Here's one for 150K...and one for 200K...that sold...the market has not corrected. Fools abound.
http://enthusiastauto.com/qsearch/?i...orm_display=51
There might be enough of a cult following for that car to keep it high. I don't think that car is very special.
As for high end shit, the market has indeed corrected.
Whoever bought a 993 9-12 months ago is kicking themselves.
Already inebriated and pounding on the keyboard at the internet people you don't like.
In a thread you know shit about. Congratulations loser.
I have a feeling my boxster will have excellent resale second to the new model with 4 cylinder turbo instead of flat 6..
Doesn't seem like that has proven to be true for the Audis... VW AG is making some pretty outstanding FI engines. Driving the 2.0T in the R and the 4.2 V8 in the S5 back to back, in that application the 2.0T is the more dynamic, more flexible, not to mention far more efficient (x2?) motor. I don't see any market preference for the 4.2 S5 vs the 3.0T S5.
Maybe BD can confirm or deny that perception is a. valid, and b. that this is common among cars converting to FI, and not unique to the S5 platform.
It won't depreciate much, but that is more from the 2nd hand nature of the car, and you not taking the new car hit. A brand new iteration of the car, also helped your purchase price.
The NA part won't really play into it IMO. Not on a Boxster. The Spyder is the only Boxster that will stay even or appreciate.
Thank you. It's a fantastic machine http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/2016...52e662760b.jpg
I was thinking about this again, as with many of these early cars, todays cars will destroy them for equal or less $$$. As beautiful as the old ferrari's are, i suspect cars of today will handle them easily on a track for a fraction of the $$$. Just kinda funny that people will pay $80K for an older car that is handled by a new mustang for $40K.