Printable View
That’s a pretty sweet soft snow collection! Curious your thoughts on the light tech clamps on the ARG. I was thinking to do something similar with some noctas. Looks like all you need is something for when it’s not waist deep at the resort.Quote:
Originally Posted by flyingskiguy
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
Wow that's perty. Can't wait to ski my ARG IIs this season.
Yeah bud!Quote:
Originally Posted by snowaddict91
Sent from my SM-S916U using Tapatalk
It's gonna be a good year.
PS: chargers are lamehttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...a769ac0458.jpg
Sent from my SM-S916U using Tapatalk
...
The Optic 114 is pretty charger?
Yeah it is happens to be my least favorite ski for where I ski . It's definitely a handful in shit snow and tight placesQuote:
Originally Posted by Velomayniac
Sent from my SM-S916U using Tapatalk
I think I’ve seen some of your videos. IIRC, you ski a lot of powder and trees/tighter spots mostly?Quote:
Originally Posted by SirVicSmasher
Assuming they are the 192s? I almost picked up a pair of the shorter ones last year before I snagged the metals off a friend.Quote:
Originally Posted by SirVicSmasher
Quote:
Originally Posted by obi wan kenobi
the 2nd pair with the ATKs are new this season and haven't been out yet. Had some of the best inbounds days of my life on the 1st pair last year and decided I wanted that feeling while touring too. Folks have been touring on fat reverse camber and/or reverse sidecut boards forever (lotus 138s, renegades, HL 132, etc) and I don't expect the ARGs to be much different in their application.Quote:
Originally Posted by Skiwald
Given the ARGs reverse camber and incredible stiffness underfoot, I felt I could get away with a lightweight pin binding with no elasticity in the heel. Still wanted some torsional support though, thus the modded freeride spacer (milled down thinner to fit under the Haute Route heel). HR10 delta is 6.5mm with the adjustment track, almost identical to the voyagers too. This setup feels like a "freeraider lite"
Thinking deathwish or countach. DD'd a DWT in the backcountry for years and know I love the shape, but feelin the pull to try something new.Quote:
Originally Posted by kid-kapow
CorrectQuote:
Originally Posted by Velomayniac
Sent from my SM-S916U using Tapatalk
Obviously I was kidding about chargers being lame . There is a time and a place for them but I much prefer carbon to 2 sheets of metal
These days I can usually make a soft ski work at high speeds in open terrain but I have a much harder time or just flat out get exhausted trying to make a super stiff metal ski work at high speeds in tight steep trees.
Sent from my SM-S916U using Tapatalk
I'm still a charger guy (who can't keep up with you on your soft skis!), but there are definitely days where they don't work well at Alpental. When I get them out at JH/Utah, it's a whole different ball game.Quote:
Originally Posted by SirVicSmasher
Lay off the smokes, manQuote:
Originally Posted by SirVicSmasher
Quit smoking 2 +years agoQuote:
Originally Posted by NW_SKIER
Sent from my SM-S916U using Tapatalk
No excuse thenQuote:
Originally Posted by SirVicSmasher
You’re a larger dude right?Quote:
Originally Posted by SirVicSmasher
My quiver is mostly chargers but I understand you completely. I can ski Moment Wildcats almost as fast as some of my supercharger skis, but then they are also fun in tight trees too. I don’t feel this with most lighter skis tho, you make me want to try Reckoners to see if I gel with them in this way. I have felt stable on some noodley K2s before so I wouldn’t be all that surprised if Reckoners can zoom.
Are the Optic 114s that rough in trees? Hand flexing them at the shop they seem softer, lighter and more playful than my Declivity X. I love DX in deep snow trees. Mr Pretzel was saying Optic 114 is easier going than DX too. I was kind of interested in the 114s cuz they seemed more playful.
I haven’t read the Blister review on the Optic114, but the Skiessentials review seems to agree with what you are saying.
In good snow( and I use that term loosely) the 114 blade optics are pretty easy for a strong skier to throw around . In what we call "shit snow" which usually involves a crust layer and has a very high moisture content I prefer not to dick around on them. A lot of that could be due to the shape as well. In Regards to the reckoners... I'd say just demo them and see what you think. Also they will be getting subtle tweaks for next year I think they are both going up 2 mm under foot and the core might be getting tweaked a little bit as well but I don't know much more than that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Velomayniac
Sent from my SM-S916U using Tapatalk
Reworking the quiver, there are a few not in the pic like a Volkl One…
Attachment 477053
Attachment 477054
Volkl One’s, love this ski. Love how easy it is to pivot and pop. Fun at low tide too!Quote:
Originally Posted by phatboy64
Agreed, I will always keep it around..Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Strokes
Delete
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...3ddd37d45c.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by eSock
Well who saw that twist coming? So much for getting a more reasonable inbounds powder ski.
DW104 - DD
DWT - DD BC
BG - pow/chop
GT - japan + lift assisted BC
Maybe I should be asking this in the Japan thread. But seems like everyone’s “Japan ski” is a protest, GT, etc. is Japan really that pure powder all the time? Are you doing cat trips/heli trips?Quote:
Originally Posted by eSock
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Protest is quite versatile. 6-60”. Rips groomers variable and funky snow. Only downside is mogulsQuote:
Originally Posted by PeachesNCream
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums