Nordica Enforcers - TGR-Enough for Their Own Thread

Bump, still looking for feedback on mounting E99 behind the line


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SWskier

Bought 191 E99 to replace OG 191 M102 as a more versatile DD. I’m firmly a traditional mount guy but looking to try something new. Anyone skiing these behind the line? Looking at -1 to -2 at most, which would still be very forward for me.

Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

---

It's all personal preference, and hard to communicate and forecast other people's tastes. But... Here's one data point for you.

I own OG 191 M102, and whenever I want, I borrow 185 E99 and 185 E104, both with demo bindings.

I ski both Enforcers on the line, and I DEFINITELY would never want to move them forward. I feel like I'd be fine if I moved them back a bit, but I never bothered to try moving the demo bindings back to try it. I just keep skiing them on the line and they're fine for me.

But based on that feeling, I forecast for you that moving back 1cm would not be regrettably too far back for you. But for you to move 2cm back, I'm less confident that you'd prefer that. Maybe yes, or maybe some people would regret drilling so far back. ...although it's true that the OG 191 M102 is WAY back there, so if you like that, then maybe.

What I want is a 191 E104, and I'd mount at either +0cm or maybe back a token -0.4cm. Nah, probably at +0cm...no point in trying to turn it into a true, old classic charger --- it's not.

.


Sent from my CPH2459 using Tapatalk

Thanks, good to hear from another m102 owner. Sounds like -1 is a safe bet. I have 192 FL105 V2 in the longer radius charger slot and retiring the M102.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums