Originally Posted by
warthog
I'll never understand this arguement. Anyone arguing which is more fun is not an expert at both. Skiing has it's days, and boarding had it's days.
I learned to snowboard because I was stuck at a small hill that I was bored skiing. I rode about 80 days for prolly three years, one of those in Boulder. This was before the fat ski was around. Boarding had skiing beat in powder. I also preferred it on groomers. There is no feeling like a well executed frontside carve on corduroy, where your body is scooped up by the g's and held almost perpendicular to the snow for a split second. If you don't know what I am talking about, then you haven't gotten good enough yet.
Skiing was always my go to on those days after a powder day, where everything is pretty chewed up, but not groomed out yet. Skis were more stable on this, and I was more confident on my skis. Also, skis were much better for areas where I would be traversing a lot, like Jackson. I couldn't imagine boarding at Jackson. My calves hurt just thinking about it.
Nowadays, fat skis and long boards have come a long way. I feel just as confident in powder on my skis as I do on a board. I also feel confident maching through chewed up snow on a 163 NeverSummer. The boards and skis are just made better, and made for specific types of riding. It is a toss up as to what to use each day. I feel like I could have fun either way. Usually, it depends what the rest of my crew is doing.
No matter what, though. Nothing in skiing beats that frontside carve. Go get some of that, and tell me different.