Originally Posted by
old goat
There's a little detail in that piece that caught my attention. The witness says he passed the victim "previously" and turned right and the victim skied across the tails of his skis. Sounds to me like the witness was at fault for passing the guy and then turning right in front of him so the guy didn't have a chance to react.
If SV loses the case it seems like something the legislature can straighten out. Or since the courts and legislators are mostly lawyers, maybe they prefer a suit-happy environment.
