Once again...
I must've missed the part that dictates your participation here?
At what point were you told to read these posts or interact with the posters?
This is freedom of speech. Go elsewhere if you don't agree.
Once again...
I must've missed the part that dictates your participation here?
At what point were you told to read these posts or interact with the posters?
This is freedom of speech. Go elsewhere if you don't agree.
Being a creeper ain't freedom of speech bobby stupid.
No part of freedom of speech protections applies to a private internet board, that argument is very tired and very stupid.
dude he didn't build a law school
That's such bullshit. OK so, she is exercising her's. If you don't like it, you go somewhere else.Quote:
Originally Posted by Beer Drinker
There is plenty of real porn on the internet. The entire padded room page could disappear and it wouldn't matter in the least.
You misconstrue Freedom for sole the benefit of what you want over what others want.Quote:
Originally Posted by Beer Drinker
What matters more is what does TGR think? What is their corporate policy regarding a special reserved part this forum being a boys porn sharing freedom of speech internet platform at the expense of women in the sport? And women in general. If that is their policy then that is A-fucking-ok. That is their right. But they should have the balls to come out and say so.
Question to TGR management, not mods: is this forum primarily a white boys club where women who don't like the objectification of women* can either just ignore it or "fuck off and suck a dick" as Beer Drinker has suggested it is?
*edit, specifically the posting of previously non-public naked pictures of women without their consent, like in the Ullr thread.
[is this forum primarily a white boys club where women who don't like the objectification of women can either just ignore it or "fuck off and suck a dick" as Beer Drinker has suggested it is?[/QUOTE]
« White Boys » hmm
tgr management didn't give a shit about damian sanders so i wouldn't expect much.
In another thread Beer Drinker defended some posts on TGR by saying:Quote:
Originally Posted by JellyBear
https://www.tetongravity.com/forums/...83#post5157683Quote:
Originally Posted by Beer Drinker
I changed "males" to "boys". Because that is how some supposed men behave.
he was eventually banned fwiw (also I am not tgr management)Quote:
Originally Posted by wyeaster
haha. I DON'T THINK YOU ARE MANAGEMENT!! group hug for mbillie1.Quote:
Originally Posted by mbillie1
he was banned because a bunch of people got pissed and made a deal out of it. otherwise, it would have gone on ad infinitum.
Will someone post a dick pic in this thread please
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using TGR Forums mobile app
damn you!Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeedashbo
Post them in the NSFW Ullr thread. Freedom of speech.
That is absolute bullshit on many grounds.Quote:
Originally Posted by dunfree
First, in this hypo mtngirl79 assumes that, "[w]e cannot know if consent was given." Now, holy fucking shit doesn't that apply to almost every picture on the internet?
Now, dunfreelegaladvice seems to be implying that a private website owner, with no knowledge of any facts of the situation, and not hosting any illegal image could somehow in anyway be potentially liable for the picture subject's claimed damages to reputation or for intentional infliction of emotional harm is ludicrous without an overt act of extortion towards the subject of the image with demonstrable knowledge of the lack of consent.
Do a little research on revenge porn laws that barely barely even provide a cause of action against the poster. 3rd party liability is ridiculous proposition given the facts of this hypo (what is more ridiculous is the actual facts, but that is just another spun out version of reality of the OP).
I think mtngirl79 should calm her tits or find somewhere else to prosthelytize, or at the very minimum, cease all non-skiing related posting, which would be equally as effective.
Secondly, posting one's opinion about the level of quality of a widget on a privately owned forum is just that; TGR is free to delete anything is so chooses either way.
Oh, I guess that means every pic of every unsmart thing done, skiing or otherwise, found on this forum should deserve a congressional inquiry.
OMG, I just saw a pro skier looking into a doorway reflection to make sure his tall T was acting tall in a photo on the internet. NS'er LAWSUIT COMMENCE!!!
1) that would be appropriate if it met the norms of this community which surround that thread (you better have taken it); andQuote:
Originally Posted by neck beard
2) there is no right of free speech on a private internet forum.
trueQuote:
Originally Posted by MakersTeleMark
MTM, making sense and shit. Will not be heeded, I bet.
I'm laughing at people pulling non-great product comments but allowing perhaps non-consensual nude photos. And making money off "stalkers". It shows the bottom line is money, not "values".Quote:
Originally Posted by MakersTeleMark
If I'm wrong, I'm ok with that and fuck you. I don't give a shit what the ski town legal fucksticks say, I think you people are assholes and always will. You do the same, I wear it as a badge of honor.
"dunfreelegaladvice"... was pretty funny.
I'm confused. Why are you here then? Looking to clean up the place?Quote:
Originally Posted by dunfree
that's the way this forum "works"Quote:
Originally Posted by neck beard
Just sent you a PM, lover.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeedashbo
Sent from my XT1650 using TGR Forums mobile app
Because you need someone to sell shit to.Quote:
Originally Posted by Meadow Skipper
You lost me. But fuck off.Quote:
Originally Posted by dunfree
I bought your ice axes. It's ok, you are old and like to perv on young tits Bob.Quote:
Originally Posted by Meadow Skipper
I'm laughing at the "honest" board that pulls negative product reviews but allows all kinds of tit pics, including things w/o explicit consent. I think that's fucked up. If you don't, fuck you.
How's the curve of the shaft? Fits well in the hand?Quote:
Originally Posted by dunfree
Lol. You said but fuckQuote:
Originally Posted by Meadow Skipper
Edit: Never mind. I went back and recognize you now.Quote:
Originally Posted by dunfree
I've been preoccupied.
Ok, that's funny.Quote:
Originally Posted by wyeaster
I would like to amend my last post, there's a lot of funny in this thread.
And on the thread subject, I don't see how consent can or can't be proven for any photo, it's simply not workable. The rule certainly has to be no nude photos without subject consent, but proving it isn't posted with consent is virtually impossible. And the alternative, always assuming there isn't consent and eliminating them altogether, is kind of anathema to the history of this place. Where would TGR be without its redhead midget porn?
Consent doesn't end with titty pics. elhefe posted pics of me shredding the gnar sans consent.
And I am curious what TGR is gonna do about it.
or, one could admit that sharing and olging porn on this site is not respectful to the women here. one could play with ones own porn in the privacy of their own home just as easily without offending anybody here by sharing and evaluating each others' fapping material.
or another hand, one could admit that likely a vocal majority doesn't give a shit how women feel here in anonlandia and will object vociferously to the idea of not permitting porn.
because, you know, we're animals and it's natural n shit.
What are you wearing?Quote:
Originally Posted by cmcrawfo
Knob porn is OK, though?Quote:
Originally Posted by wyeaster
Note to self: never open a pm from viva.
Lo,fuckingLQuote:
Originally Posted by pisteoff
you mean the half dozen hung studs i posted in the sea of many thousands of pics of women?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mazderati
Or, if you are going to be offended, maybe not click on a thread with NSFW in it's title?