^^^ That is one hot lunch lady. I'd let her toss my salad!
Mmmmm... Lesbian prison sex...Quote:
Originally Posted by HansJob
Printable View
^^^ That is one hot lunch lady. I'd let her toss my salad!
Mmmmm... Lesbian prison sex...Quote:
Originally Posted by HansJob
^^^^or the guards:eek:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tippster
Really? Notchy beak, unkempt hair, and black eyes. Scary.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cinnepa
Exactly. My French teacher was hot.
...........Quote:
Originally Posted by guroo270
Attachment 148248
I would do her.Quote:
Originally Posted by 4matic
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/...41_634x377.jpg
Admit it, you would do a soggy Topsider.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby Finstock
bwahahhahahahaaaahahahaaaah!Quote:
Originally Posted by commonlaw
damn, she just couldn't get enough, more charges yesterday....
Lauren Harrington-Cooper, the former Wyoming Valley West teacher jailed for allegedly having sex with a pair of students, was charged Tuesday with making inappropriate contact with two other high school boys.
Investigators said they discovered Harrington-Cooper's relationships with the boys, ages 16 and 17 at the time, after her initial arrest in December. Those relationships, investigators said, began in October 2012 and continued after her arrest in phone calls and text messages.
Harrington-Cooper, 31, of 377 Winola Ave., Kingston, denied the allegations after investigators charged her Tuesday with two counts of unlawful contact with a minor and two counts of corruption of minors. The charges adding to an arrest record that included pending counts of institutional sexual assault, sexual contact with a student and corruption of minors.
In the latest chapter of the saga, investigators said Harrington-Cooper had "sexually suggestive conversations" with the 16-year-old for several months in person and through text messages.
The conversations led to an introduction to a 17-year-old student who had "sexually explicit conversations" that blossomed into a physical encounter in the parking lot of a shopping center, investigators said.
The 16-year-old, who has since turned 17, said he and Harrington-Cooper shared personal information while in school, including details of her sexual relationship with her husband and supposed problems with her marriage, investigators said.
The 16-year-old said Harrington-Cooper told him "she found the 17-year-old hot" and "had a thing for him," investigators said. The 16-year-old said he was trying to "make it happen" for the 17-year-old by acting as the middle man, investigators said.
Sometime between fall 2012 and winter 2013, Harrington-Cooper and the the 17-year-old, who has since turned 18, made arrangements to meet at the Gateway Shopping Center in Edwardsville, investigators said.
The 16-year-old dropped the 17-year-old off and the older boy got into Harrington-Cooper's vehicle, investigators said. Harrington-Cooper and the teenager fondled each other outside their clothing and talked about having sex, but the 17-year-old felt uncomfortable because they were not in a secluded area, investigators said.
The 17-year-old told investigators that he and Harrington-Cooper continued to communicate through text messages after their encounter, and Harrington-Cooper told him to make sure he deleted the messages to ensure she wouldn't get in trouble, according to an arrest affidavit.
The 16-year-old, who was Harrington-Cooper's student in seventh grade and again in 11th grade, said the implications to have sex were always there and that he could have gone through with it anytime he wanted, investigators said. During their conversations, he said, they would flirt back and forth, saying there was always a "certain vibe."
Harrington-Cooper invited him to her house on three occasions, and the second time he went over he said Harrington-Cooper lifted her shirt to show him the butterfly tattoo on her breast, then told him that if they lived together, "they would have fun," according to the affidavit.
The night before his 17th birthday, investigators said, the younger boy and Harrington-Cooper chatted on Facebook about having lunch on his birthday. He asked her to take half a day off from school to have lunch, and according to school records cited by investigators, she took half a personal day. Harrington-Cooper picked him up, they went to a restaurant in Moosic and drove around awhile, investigators said. The affidavit did not indicate anything physical transpired, only the suggestion that sex was intended.
Magisterial District Judge Paul Roberts revoked Harrington-Cooper's $25,000 bail after prosecutors said she contacted the victims through phone calls and text messages, a violation of a bail condition barring her from contact with any student or alleged victim.
She remained jailed at the Luzerne County Correctional Facility. Roberts set $25,000 straight bail for the new charges and ordered her to undergo a mental health evaluation. A preliminary hearing has been set for 1:30 p.m., Feb. 4.
Attachment 149410
She's definitely Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs, while also be addicted to teenage dick. Wack.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mntlion
Frosted tips. He's sending her out collecting. :fmicon:
i wish my health teacher in junior made sexual advances on me
little blonde, nice tits, good body, she must have been about 25
also, there was a spanish tutor I had in high school. fuck! great tits, long legs, sick, body. it always happened that whenever she tutored me I was home alone. just one bang would have been amazing.
A 12 yr old. Seriously? She cops a plea and gets 6 months? Yea, that's justice. :nonono2:
That judge just saved Washington taxpayers a buttload of money with very little threat to the community.
No fucking shit.Quote:
Originally Posted by HansJob
They'd throw a man into the deepest hole they have and let him rot for life.Quote:
Shaw pleaded guilty to two counts of second-degree child rape, and in exchange the state recommended a six-month sentence.
I thought it was a dude!Quote:
Originally Posted by Tippster
Kharma can be a bitch sometimes. Or in this case a bitch that looks like a dude on a meth bender.
You Washingtonians have ALL the luck!
And another one!
http://kutv.com/news/offbeat/former-...-with-students
http://kutv.com/resources/media/53aa...?1450545835730
Would bang.
Nice.
Hot teacher makes kids fantasy come true and is held on $75k bond while DEA agents daughter gets caught with pounds of life ruining drugs and gets $39k bond.
Justice.
I just feel bad for the victims, those poor victims. If I could take their place I would, no child should have to suffer like this
16 year old kid in Menomonee Falls was just caught banging his teacher. Married two kids. She was craving BBC
Teh funnehzQuote:
Originally Posted by AK47bp
Nothing funny about a teacher raping their students.
Do you ever turn it off?Quote:
Originally Posted by doughboyshredder
Go away
Shocker!Quote:
Wey had sex with that teen, a friend of her family, some 10 times after meeting at a student ministry program
http://memesvault.com/wp-content/upl...me-Damn-09.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by beaterdit
So attractive people are pediphiles (sp?) also, not surprised. But still kiddy diddlers.
Would bang, for sure.
But the way things developed as described in the news report indicate the crazy strays into the creepy/pedo/criminal with this one, for sure. The facts of some others are meh, but the facts in this one indicate she pushed the issue. Weird.
eh, when my brother was 15-16 and in high school, he had a sexual fling with a woman in her late 20s (not his teacher). He most certainly was not raped.
Just because a teenager wants something doesn't mean it is ok for adults who know better to give it to them. I am 41, if a 15 year old girl wants me that doesn't make it ok. I am the grownup. I think there is some room for debate about what the age for consent should be, after all 18 seems kind of arbitrary. But yea, your bro was molested. And what she did has probably negatively affected his future relationships.Quote:
Originally Posted by Danno
sorry, I disagree. I may think that it was weird for the woman to want to sleep with a 15 year old, but it was not weird for my brother and he was not molested. I won't make blanket statements like that. I realize that the law has to have bright line rules for this shit, but humanity is not bright line rules when it comes to sexuality.Quote:
Originally Posted by mcsquared
Yeah, he probably lacks confidence to even speak to the fairer sex and hasn't been laid in years... or hasn't moved on because many people have had random sex and been just fine.Quote:
Originally Posted by mcsquared
A friend of mine (always a friend right?), slept with some older women (28-36 year olds) while in high school and now all he does is ski pow and have great sex with his long term, hot, funny, intelligent girl friend between going to his financially rewarding job. I'm sure he regrets all of it.
You guys that think this is ok should all join NAMBLA that way you can all try and get age of consent laws removed
^^^ That's all well and good, but if you read the news coverage it appears entirely possible that Travis County teacher pushed them into it. Power positions in those situations if the kid doesn't want it may have made these instances significantly different than others. I mean, one kid was apparently distraught enough about it to spontaneously admit it to his parents. That's different than, say, how many others of these come out with a kid bragging to his buddies, school admin finds out, cops interview him, and he admits it in that context.
Not all the same...
Would you feel differently if it was your 15 year old sister? I agree that laws surrounding sexuality are weird and hard to make fit in all cases. But having different rules for boys and girls makes me uneasy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Danno
Bravo for misreading everything and accusing everyone of being Jerry Sandusky, bravo.Quote:
Originally Posted by doughboyshredder
Sure, which is why I said this:Quote:
Originally Posted by LightRanger
FTR, unless y'all have read different news articles than what was posted, we have extremely limited info on this case to draw any judgment whatsoever. I didn't see any indication of the ages of the 2 victims; 14 is different than 17. I also think it's a bit presumptuous to say "one kid was apparently distraught enough about it to spontaneously admit it to his parents". All the article says is "Authorities became aware of the incident after the victim made an outcry to their parent, who then alerted law enforcement." The kid could have made the "outcry" during an argument; to assume he was distraught is just that, an assumption.Quote:
Originally Posted by Danno
It's complicated for sure (and let's be clear, it is very different when it is a teacher or some other person in a position of authority). But my brother was a player in HS, so I don't think he was preyed upon. And I understand why having different rules makes you uneasy; we don't have different legal rules for all sorts of reasons. That said, there are huge differences between men and women, and how our society treats them, so, yeah, I might feel differently.Quote:
Originally Posted by mcsquared
Again, we have legal bright line rules because we have to, but those rules didn't exist until very recently. The right and wrong of sexuality has evolved, and not everything can be solved by a bright line rule. For instance, does all the concern end at 18? Couldn't a 19 year old be preyed upon too, even if there is no law for consenting "adults"? Is a 45 year old and a 19 year old hunky dory, while a 24 year old and a 17 year old a crime (but only in certain states)?