If your only two criteria for measuring a city were cost of living and outdoor recreation I'd think Ogden would be at the top of the list, but if you add in unsightly buildings/bums etc... it loses ground quickly, for now.
I love the place. It's home of the nations largest historic district and I'm an old home junky. Most of the homes are beat to hell or cut-up into 6 units, but more and more of them restored every year. The house we currently live in couldn't be built today for under a mil, but we got it for 160K (5,000 sq ft). Here are just a few photos (I need to add more): http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?s...8&l=98e74dbda6
Here's a recent Boulder article that's really an Ogden article:
http://www.dailycamera.com/ci_18194889
I could spend days writing all the reason why I like the place. If it were already completely restored and squeaky clean it wouldn't be for me. I couldn't afford it. Right now it's so cheap that not only can I have a pretty crazy quality of life, but I also have the capacity to affect real change. Between myself and the group of friends/family I work with we've already restored 35+ properties in town. It's pretty cool to have that ability to change something and there are a ton of others doing the exact same thing. I think the city has already hit critical mass for turning around (in terms of number of people here making it happen). It will still take years to do, but the people are here.