igneous? ffl, fat, in a 190, flexed at around a 260?
Printable View
igneous? ffl, fat, in a 190, flexed at around a 260?
yeah. But then yer gonna stomp the piss out of a 25 footer to a rock and yer expensive skis are gonna break.Quote:
Originally Posted by El Duderino
just sayin.
and that is exactly why with only 1 exception( praxis) i don't buy new skis, you are going to destroy them, 10-20 days on any good pair of skis doesn't do that much damage, one set of holes isn't that detrimental, and I don't feel that bad when I put a 6" long coreshot in them
naww, I'm pumped on em. I'll be skiing XXLs.
Really, I keep this banter going because I'm bored as fuck while I wait for the snow to fly.
Living at your parents house, even for a short time post college is like a long shitty hangover to a great party.
192 brohemouths, because they'll put the spank down on the XXL's as far as ease of turning and stability.
That's seriously what splat should do as marketing. Here test the XXL side by side with my 192 bro...I bet I already know which one you'll like better...with that goofy frin of his.
^^ Never underestimate the power of splat's goofy Frin!
El Dude, how come you dont go Bsquad ? stiffer than XXL and cheaper. You cant slarve a turn on squads like you can XXL and they arnt a pow ski (both because of the narrow waist an big taper) but if you wanna shred........@ least try a pair
I find the Squads too stiff. I like the fact that the XXL has a softer tail. Z your right. Ive beaten skis to death in no time before so considering Ill be getting a bigger charging ski and charging that much harder on them theyll should be disposable.
Soul Skier, Ive thought about both FAT and FFGS Ingeous, but add tax, shipping, and any possible duties on the cost and it makes sense to stay local (Capital) if I even decide to go that route.
Im leaning on sticking with my XXLs. Stiff, wide, its what I want. I just wish they had a bit more taper, but whatever, I aint gonna get pick over them.