Printable View
Just throwing out there yesterday I was in my ultra s's and hit a little dip going way too fast that I was absolutely sure was gonna pop me, but my boots absorbed the impact and flexed without folding, and I was so impressed at their performance. Probably saved me from a concussion, glad I grabbed these last season for inbounds duty!
Huh. I've always felt the XTD 130 has a clear niche being lighter and narrower than most 50/50 boots. Maybe it was too much of an in-betweener/easy to overpower at the current ~1500g weight?Quote:
Originally Posted by onenerdykid
Personally, as someone who's happily used the XTD 130 for a few years and is due for a replacement, I'd now have a hard time not going for the XTD LV 130/140 in this higher-weight class. But maybe the XTD 130 still goes uphill better than those?
We were finding that most people were using the first gen Ultra XTD as their daily driver in the resort. Given that, it made a lot of sense to up its beefy-ness. But, I would say that with the new liner, it goes uphill more efficiently in comparison to a stock first gen boot. And I would also say the same in comparison to the usual suspects in this category.Quote:
Originally Posted by kathleenturneroverdrive
I support the new changes. GW has no place on 1500g boots, and 1500g boots have no place in the resort. Putting GW on a boot implies that it will be good inbounds and you need more mass for that. On the flip side, touring on GW soles sucks and I appreciate the full rubber soles on the new Backland XTD.
Interesting. That def makes it intriguing. Of course, buying the Boa version just to annoy Boa-haters puts you over Lange.Quote:
Originally Posted by onenerdykid
I don't disagree - XTD only works for me inbounds because my hill requires significant time spent walking uphill to access good terrain. And I still added a beefier liner and powerstrap. But I don't think the changes are "bad" at all - more that the new weight class puts the XTD into a pretty crowded field of boots.Quote:
Originally Posted by Benneke10
Yeah I had tried to get the new pivots in early, the process was so difficult I rounded one of the internal nuts and had to give up. Will it ever be possible to have a boot where this part doesn't wear out? All of my boots have it to some degree.Quote:
Originally Posted by onenerdykid
Edit: does the mirror pivot help with that?
Excited for the beefy backland XTD; this is definitely the category of boot I am looking for.
What’s happening with the Ultra 130 boots? Is the Mimic Platinum going in there? Does the Mimic liner add stiffness? Is Mimic Platinum something I can do from home?
I had a pair of Ultra 130 S from a couple years ago, before the lower was beefed up, and couldn’t get past the bellowing but really liked the fit. At the time I was really struggling with my Salomon S/Max 130 carbon - skied great but occasionally killed a ski day over foot pain. After the Atomic experiment failed due to bellowing and vagueness under flex I baked my Salomons a little more aggressively and got them to work without pain. I think the Atomics are probably next depending on how they stack up, stiffness/control wise, against the Salomons. Care to weigh in there? I prefer non-touring boots inbounds because I like simple.
With the new beefier construction, regular Hawx Ultra definitely gets around the bellowing issues of the first generation. And what is happening to the Hawx Ultra XTD Mimic Platinum liner is also happening to the Hawx Ultra Mimic Platinum liner (aside from the Achilles' Flex Zone). Plus there is also a Mimic Professional liner (foam injected + Mimic) for Hawx Ultra that adds way more precision and power. It doesn't add "stiffness" per se, but it makes the boot more responsive, stable, and powerful.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mustonen
The Mirror Pivot is the same hardware and same way it mounts to the shell, it's more of a geometry & positioning tweak that allows the cuff to glide more smoothly.Quote:
Originally Posted by kamtron
Do you k ow what the BSL of the XTD in a 25 or 26 will be?
Is the lower buckle on the XTD in the same position as in the current Backlands or is it a a bit higher to pull the foot back into the heel pocket more? Hard to tell from the pic.
Backland XTD 26.5 = 297mmQuote:
Originally Posted by wilcox510
Hawx Ultra XTD 26.5 = 302mm
The instep strap on the Backland XTD is roughly in the same place as the current Backland. If we go any higher it will start to interfere with the cuff ROM and that's no bueno. I think you'll find it to be in a good spot.
Holee shit, even have my size in stock. Wtf is CTD? Would need a bootfitter,though. Or a clear go-ahead from ONK that hot air ovenwork is fine.Quote:
Originally Posted by gregL
support the raddest project going: http://heritagelabskis.com
This boot never really officially made it to market, but apparently Level 9 got their hands on some. "CTD" is our digitally connected power strap that is a Carv on steroids. Unfortunately, there are issues on the app end and it doesn't work, but the boot is a legit CS 130 in a unique color way. I would get it just for that and put on a Professional Dual Strap.Quote:
Originally Posted by arild
Will the Hawx Prime XTD also get the full PU treatment?
Any news of a Hawx Magna XTD in the future?
This thread is cool.
Thanks for taking the time to give us this information.
Cost on the hawx mimic professional?
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
Red is faster. Even within the same boot line…
Attachment 443631
Attachment 443632
Love my Hawx Ultras, keep the info flowing OneNerdyKid!!
These changes look great and answer most of my concerns I had with the original XTD 130. Even the taupe color scheme looks cool, even if I think there should be a Redster freeride boot (maybe we can get a XTD 140 in Red, I know wishful thinking). Although, it will take some serious reviews before it gets me to switch back from the current Cochise that replaced it. I’m guessing with the switch to PU, it should be a consistent 130 flex with good rebound as I used to blow through the flex when I hit a mogul on the OG XTD. 1800 grams is about right for the category, which I will describe more as 80/20 than what everyone calls 50/50. Let’s be honest, very few who get a boot to use in the resort uses it 50% in the backcountry. Most who ski that much BC have a dedicated boot for it.
^or they tour to things where access isn’t long or they prefer ski performance. Keep in mind that these boots walk better than most things ten years ago and ski ten times better. Most people around here don’t tour on ultralight boots.
I'm confused about the fit of the new Hawx Ultra XTD.Quote:
Originally Posted by onenerdykid
I have a 20/21 Hawx Ultra XTD 120 and a first-gen 130 XTD. I like them for touring. 120 even more - I came to the conclusion that I don't need the stiffest boot for touring. But they're weak for regular resort use.
But their fit is almost excellent.
If I want to add a new Hawx Ultra XTD as a resort and travel boot to my quiver, what changes should I expect in terms of fit?
Already is in 22/23!Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasGortex
Slightly more toe room but still feeling like you are in the correct size & overall fit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sashko
Sounds like an interesting idea...Quote:
Originally Posted by XavierD
Thanks! Including the 130? Both Evo and Backcountry list the 130 as PA but the 120 as PU. Atomic’s website (at least on my phone) doesn’t seem to specify unless I’m missing something. Prolite is a construction technique not material, right?Quote:
Originally Posted by onenerdykid