2018-19 Praxis Skis Info and Resource Thread

Praxis is the shit, period. Keith gives real skiers every option they could possibly imagine. If people want a ski that fits a large generic skier group that’ll work for most folks most of the time, then yeah they’re obviously not for you. If you know what you really like and what really works for you as far as build construction, shape, and a huge amount of custom options, then they are. In my personal opinion you will not find a better built ski anywhere. I fully understand there are some indie companies that make phenomenally built skis with outstanding designs and I have, and still do own some of their skis and have nothing but great things to say about them. Praxis fits what I believe is a huge market space that really doesn’t understand what they can deliver. I truly think that most skiers don’t understand what Praxis can offer and once they do they’ll get it for life. I’ve personally sold (not affiliated in any way) skiers on every level the right skis for them and they are fans for life, you will not find a better built ski anywhere. Not talking shit about any other companies but Keith’s shit is just better built and if you actually know what you want a ski to do, there is no better option in the industry, if you want a ski that works for 90% of skiers than yeah, tons of better options for you. I think it’s a damn shame more skiers don’t support such an amazing company with such an amazing product. Take the time to discuss with him what you want and you’ll most likely be fully sold on what you get. No, I guess it’s not for everyone, but if you have any idea of what you really want a ski to do, Keith has one for you

Thom, I agree with your point re. demo fleet and exposure. And, sadly, I'd wager that most folks still have a general ignorance for custom skibuilding, even on this forum. Sure, a phone call is easy and you can learn a lot and get something sick built for not a lot of money, but folks are lazy and there's a knowledge barrier to be humbled by. Who does that when you can just hit "buy"???

I ain't tryin to paint the brand as bogus by any means. Undoubtedly he builds with great skill.

The Wootest is a cool ski that really draws me in. No way i would buy without a try first. Looks like the ultimate pow tour rig.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Norseman

Thom, I agree with your point re. demo fleet and exposure. And, sadly, I'd wager that most folks still have a general ignorance for custom skibuilding, even on this forum. Sure, a phone call is easy and you can learn a lot and get something sick built for not a lot of money, but folks are lazy and there's a knowledge barrier to be humbled by. Who does that when you can just hit "buy"???

I ain't tryin to paint the brand as bogus by any means. Undoubtedly he builds with great skill.

---

I think custom is hard in general. Some people want custom topsheets and bases, just look at this and the on3p threads. And there's nothing wrong with that if they can get the process down to where that customization doesn't add much to the cost.
Other people want a custom ski and know what they want down to a ton of detail. See the Lhasa rocker discussions. But those changes are harder and can't get distributed except in group buys. Every now and then we see someone who buys a +/-10mm version and appears to stick with them. But a decent number of those skis seem to go up for sale after a bit. Maybe that's because the design didn't work at that width, maybe it's because the purchasers are ski whores and are constantly on the chase for something better.

Custom flexes are great, but without being on the ski first it's hard to know if the change is good, it's definitely a gamble. And flex profile is so important but hard to convey. The friflyt guys tried, maybe they have kept it up but it was hard to go from the numbers to "that's the feeling I like" and edge hold is a different problem entirely.

I used to nerd out on ski numbers, and play around in that ski cad program trying to understand what I liked, what other people liked, and what else could be fun to try. But I never figured out how to think about mount location very well for example. For my gpos I went with the board consensus of -1 or -1.5(?) And never felt like I needed to change it. But I'm sure someone else would feel the need to move it elsewhere depending on how they ski.

I've probably looked at buying custom praxis three times in the last 5 years and never pulled the trigger. There's a lot to consider, I wasn't sure what the gain would be, and in some ways the most appealing option was a low profile topsheet with minimal branding.

Huh, guess I've got lots of half formed thoughts about custom skis. Might make an interesting thread on it's own.

The touring skis are perfection in their category. Veneer , ul , carbon is a pretty amazing blend and all are purpose built. Really liked my exp, yeti and bc. Mount point is bang on. Praxis has that ability. Also i want a wootest.
Gpo is probably my fave ski ever. Id love to see a standard gpo(with veneer) and a 106 gpo(also veneer)
Piste jib 99 and 109 and maybe stagger the sizing if they both cant go in 5cm increments
Protest 118 and 128
Ditch the rest.
Everything that wasnt a touring model i mounted back 1cm, pj, gpo, concept (protests -1.5 so im guessing wootests as well). Im ok with doing that but ive watched too many people not consider this and give up on amazing skis. I think if the mount points were more standard theyd sell better. Generally if you mount forward , you know you know you mount forward and have no problem doing that. Also, i love the veneers, theyre win win win win. Light , damp, durable and bitchin. Construction on praxis is second to none. Crazy how well theyre built. My gpo's probably have 300+ days on them and no core shots, full edge and still factory camber and powerful as ever. Freaky how good they still are. Im not keen on the new piste jib graphic but i love that ski(at -1) and im still buying some. Im a tell erryone its fuscia god dammit
Also Keith is one hell of a solid dude. I think people that conduct business like that should be rewarded. I cant imagine not having some praxis. Im not into buying bic pen chinese skis

Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app

My UL gpo veneer will remain with me until they get hung on the wall. Absolutely amazing skis.
I hope that the smaller builders all settle into a solid and lasting place in the industry, it's such a great alternative to big brands, if you know what you want and appreciate the quality.


Sent from my SM-G960U using TGR Forums mobile app

I liked the S7 then the squad the the BG. I laugh every time I see someone grab an air tip S7. That’s an example of tweaking a design in a terrible way. But they sell a lot to the masses. It’s gotta be tough when you know how to build good skis but people just buy the gimmicky mass produced and then wonder why their tips fold on them and they can’t keep up.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

I absolutely love my custom carbon/nylon GPO’s. Mounted -1. The new Lhasa fats are pretty great as well. I think I’ll be keeping both of those. Do wish I had bought my GPO a little shorter...they’d have AT bindings on them if I had.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Artist Formerly Known as Leavenworth Skier

Why I haven't bought Praxis:
Graphics mostly suck unless you layer veneer or something, which gets expensive. (Ie the Praxilhasa Norse & 2funky have)
A lot of the designs/shapes are meh and still the original design. Not the continual improvement/refinement that has been happening with brands like ON3P.
Too many choices. Rx? Or Freeride? Or GPO?
No clear collections of skis to differentiate models by use/deisgn. (freeride, freestyle, touring, dad skis, etc.)
Too many choices within the choices (+10 -10, flex, layup, weight core) It's confusing.
Mount points sketch me out as they seem to be engineered too far forward... thread after thread of multiple remounts, complaints of tip dive. Multiple mags I know have had quietly had skiabilty issues with Praxis skis and have chosen to stay quiet about it... but I haven't been that impressed by feedback.
The ridiculously sharp tunes. I should not need to detune/retune a ski out of wrapper designed for freeride skiing.
Complaints of tip dive on skis that line up with similar skis in the category that don't have any issue with tip dive. Heck, how many killer FWT runs has Tabke blown because of tip dive?

Just my .02 cents

---

Doesn't matter, you would have sold them by now anyways.... [emoji1]

Lots of stuff to comment on, but Keith’s mentioned a number of times in the past he never set out to make a lot of money. He makes skis because he enjoys it and he enjoys making the best skis he can for himself and his customers. TGR is pretty much his target consumer group, because a lot of us do care about core, flex, graphic, veneer, carbon changes and know enough to choose that + the model that suits them. My Quixote’s in a heavy/carbon/veneer layup are my favorite resort ski. That would not be true in enduro/nylon layup. But for someone else the opposite might be true.

As everyone is well aware Keith has always bent over backwards to try and give his customers exactly what they want, and at pretty insane prices. Full custom skis from other companies costs $1k plus, even partial customs (ie different top sheet graphic ON3P) cost $900+

Most of us have been getting full customs from Keith for ~$500 or less with referrals and discount codes during his sales. Doesn’t surprise me it hasn’t ultimately been sustainable, but I’m pretty thankful I got the custom skis I did at those prices.

The comments about top sheet graphics surprise me, I can’t imagine there isn’t a graphic in the library that could suit pretty much any person’s tastes. I think a lot of them are way better looking than 90% of the skis out there, besides a few (Moment, some ON3P come to mind, though I also really dislike some of those companies topsheet designs currently). Course I also strongly dislike some of Praxis graphics. Veneer obviously are dope. But to each their own.

Unfortunately to keep the doors open I think at anything other than a very small scale you have to tap into the mainstream market to survive. Moment, ON3P, even Icelantic have done so by partnering with big online shops (Backcountry, Evo) and some bigger chain stores. Blister and some of the other review sites like outdoor gear lab also provide a lot of publicity to skiers like the TGR crowd who just don’t happen to be on online forums.

-Personally I think the best way forward would be to focus on a core lineup (2 touring skis, 1-2 park, 2 all mountain, 1 big mountain, 1 or 2 freeride, protests). Only offer them in the layup and flex that makes sense and a crowd pleasing graphic. Maybe with veneer as a brand distinguisher.

I think trying to focus on making some park skis and getting some talented athletes to rep them could be a great idea too. I think that’s helped ON3P a ton- the park market is pretty big and populated by young guys who will bother to look up stuff online rather than just walk into the local shop. Keith’s skis are some of/the most durable I’ve owned and would really have and edge (ha!) over the big brands in that department for park.

-Offer standard lineup skis for sale in local shops, try to partner with online stores and big chains. May take a few seasons.

-Send a bunch of stock skis out for reviews at blister, other online sites. Go to SIA. Some ski magazines would be good but I’m sure big $$$.

-Offer custom ski runs in the off seasons at full price ~$900. That’s what they’re worth IMO. Maybe with limited options. Perhaps offer custom run/experimental skis when a group gets together like we did on the Lhasa’s and 192 protests

My .02 - Regardless I will always support Kieth however he’s making skis. My custom Veneer protests, custom veneer Quixote’s, and veneer Lhasa pow fat collabs, and presumably my new custom veneer piste jibs can only be pried out of my cold dead hands.

I’ve had and enjoyed OG protests, powderboards, gpos, and concepts as well. I regret selling the concepts - ski does not get as much love as it should. Pretty perfect one ski quiver IMO.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

I’m 2 for 4 for buying and keeping Praxis skis, both of the skis I’m keeping were custom. I was woefully under prepared to build custom skis and Keith helped a ton. What I didn’t realize is that all I really wanted was custom top sheets and bases. The Super Freerides took forever to figure out, multiple detunes, multiple remounts, and they now are good for me, but it shouldn’t take that long. I tried to sell them multiple times, and it would of saved me a bunch if work and effort. Similar story with my Protests.

It’s a cool idea, but the long term viability is tough. I wish Keith the best, and if we get another shot at custom orders, I’ll be in for another pair, but it’s a tough road.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

fwiw custom orders still being taken at praxis, just the link is lower on the page...

Just a thought, but i think that Praxis (or any "boutique" brand) should have a signature aesthetic feature that appears on all skis the same way that moment has squared off tips and tails. Its free marketing and always gets asked about on chairlifts or in lift lines. It could be as simple as a all skis having a bright orange base, or all skis having a built in carry system (thatll apeal to the rich folk out there), All skis have a variation of veneer topsheets, etc.

Its easy to get lost in the hordes of other skis out there if your skis look exactly the same as everyone elses (at least to the untrained eye), and then you have to rely on word of mouth from notoriously tight lipped core bros who only buy at bro discount, and the odd dentist who buys at full retail. To stand out as the little guy, it really helps to have a big budget, or a defining aesthetic feature IMO.


But then again, who said that these small shops want to grow into producing 10,000+ pairs of skis per year. Im just happy that i finally scooped a pair of protests this fall before they were all gone.

Maybe their signature aesthetic should be pink? This is so random, but maybe helps Praxis blow up on the gram https://instagram.com/p/B4k5uDPlBKB/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by galibier_numero_un

If Keith listened to most of these suggestions, he'd be in worse shape than he is. 195cm - do you really think there are more than a handful of people who would buy them? What about the Supergoat? One run and done, right?


If 20 of you opened your wallets and went to Keith, I'm sure he would have built a long missile for you.

I'll bet most of the critics here weigh well North of 220 Lbs. Cut your beer consumption.

Stagnant development? Thank goodness the GPO remains unchanged. It's my favorite ski ever ... lucky design or not.

Read the debate about whether the Lhasa should have changed at all - people were on the fence. How old is that design? Change a seminal design just for the helluvit?

Agreed about ambiguous mount points.

I also agree that the +10/-10 was a mistake. These need to be a fully tested model rather than a "what the hell, let's try it" option. It should have been more like how Moment treats the Wildcat (two widths) or ON3P does the Woodsman & Wren.

Can you imagine a fleshed out GPO family in 96/106/116? It would make much more sense (less buyer confusion) than say, having a Pste Jib (even if the PJ were merely renamed) along with some random 106 ski in the lineup.

Topsheets & ON3P: Other than recent Billy Goats (since 15/16), the Steeples, and the plain top, their skis make me want to get out a can of Krylon. They make me want to puke. No accounting for taste, I suppose ;-)

Ski design competency - the real problem lies in the difficulty in demoing. No ski can be all things to all people, and several designs were intended to be niche skis.

Then there's the TGR Bro factor - ignoring some phenomenal skis.

For example, I picked up a pair of EXPs from @grinch last Spring - a completely ignored ski when discussions of Zero G 85s come up - amazing stability, maneuerability, and versatility in an 88mm ski.

Lastly (in honor of Alpy) ... Praxis Rx.

... Thom

---

Supergoat had 2 preorder cycles w/ premade customs in stock most of the last 2 seasons. Looks like SG is also still available on website for $799. Must have sold enough that there has been rumblings of a MegaGoat possibility.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PlayItLeo

Maybe their signature aesthetic should be pink? This is so random, but maybe helps Praxis blow up on the gram https://instagram.com/p/B4k5uDPlBKB/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

Could play off the vocallocalbro thing and throw a "PNW Grown", "ColoRadBro", etc regional branding on the tips and tails.

Actually, heres a good one: put full song lyrics on the tails so that people behind you have something to read in the liftlines and would get them singing/humming. I think people would find that pretty cool. Def some copyright issues with that, but that would be pretty interesting. Could easily market to different demographics with that one.

Assume y'all have seen this new experimental ski now for order: https://www.praxisskis.com/experimen...tal-184-94-18/

Anyone gonna get one? Sounds intriguing. I'd like that design/layup in 187, 104 underfoot, with a touch more tail rocker. Please and thanks!

I bet the next experimental is a big mountain ski.

I hope Praxis figures out this next phase, because their good skis are superlative.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tuco

Supergoat had 2 preorder cycles w/ premade customs in stock most of the last 2 seasons. Looks like SG is also still available on website for $799. Must have sold enough that there has been rumblings of a MegaGoat possibility.

---

Yup, seems as if Scott can generate a bit more demand for a batch like this than Keith can (for whatever reason).

One could argue that the Lhasa run was a PM gear thing and not a Praxis thing, which would leave only the Wootest 1.0/2.0 (which is still remarkable).

I wonder if the relative reluctance to put together a run of some sort of Praxis missile here is merely a numbers game (ON3P having a larger pool to draw from), ON3P's reputation for chargers, or something else (FUD about the end result, for example)?.

... Thom

Not to beat a dead horse here but: What brings home the bacon for ON3P is Jeffreys and Magnus', where BGs seem fairly steadily in demand too. I remember Iggy stating that four models took up the majority of their sales. I have no idea what those skis are for Praxis, but they sure as hell are not Protests :)

I also agree with the points raised concerning both graphics and that signature design on their skis could be helpful. Not to keep bringing up ON3P, but Iggy mentioned that the green ON3P bases was one of the better moves they made in terms of brand recognition (thanks Apple).

Also, in terms of gaphics - go conservative for the skis that you want to sell the most of. Most of Praxis' offerings this year might look stellar for the right person, but the less busy designs are for sure the most likely to appeal to lots of people. The touring range look fantastic imho, while a lot of the other skis are probably a bit more polarizing. After looking more closely at the range I too think a lot of them actually look pretty damned good - the 9D for one look amazing. I mean

Attachment 301484

I am unsure how long it would take for me to grow tired of it, and the second hand value would prob be very low - but damned they look good. A Protest with that graphic is pretty enticing :) I have not noticed how good this design looks before tonight having just spotted the UFO and though wtf? I sincerly doubt that that most 40+ males will ski on a ski with that graphic though, though I could be wrong.

The ON3P/Moment formula of strategic presence in certain shops + online sales as the main revenue channel seems to work for them. Perhaps by offering less choices, tidying up the graphics department a bit and by organizing the range in more easily understood ski segments could generate more sales.

Both ON3P and Moment's range are really easy to understand. For instance ON3P:
- park: different widths (dw) of a design concept with underfoot detuning
- freestyle: different widths of a design concept that prefer a centered stance
- all mountain: different widths of a design concept that can be used with a centered stance or driven from the shovels
- freeride: different widths of a design concept that prefer to be driven
- powder: different widths, similar design

Yeah, I took ON3P a long time to get there, but the range makes a ton of sense and is very, very easy to understand with a minimum of explanation. The same can be said for Moment's - that is, their range is even easier to understand. With Praxis, well - sorting them according to width just adds to the confusion for me. Understanding the range takes a bit more for the outsider, while most Praxis fans probably understand it a lot more easily than I do.

Anyway, while my first outing on these was not a great success, I still think they are perhaps the nicest looking skis I have ever seen in person. Sorry to post them yet again.
Attachment 301486

And yes - the sale is back on for those that missed out above. So good for us, not so good for Praxis. This should be the time of year when they sell the most skis no? I hope they will be able to pull through. These sales must wreck havoc on their margins, even if they are able to shift stock.

sorry to be long winded, especially as I seem to remember people mentioning that Keith doesn't frequent TGR ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Muggydude

I regret selling the concepts - ski does not get as much love as it should. Pretty perfect one ski quiver IMO.

---

I fully endorse this statement.

cheers,
john (and all the best to Keith moving forward)

For all of you who have wanted to try a skinny Protest.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Praxis-Prot...0AAOSws41dxajA

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by travel_to_ski

For all of you who have wanted to try a skinny Protest.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Praxis-Prot...0AAOSws41dxajA

---

Those are on KSL as well

Daaaaaamn, that’s a burl ass build! Don’t know if that makes a lot of since to me but quite the find for sure!

Bet theyre awesome

Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app

Little e-mail from Keith and crew:

Renovation Sale Phase 2

ALL SKIS 40% OFF
To test the waters on this new approach, of great skis at great prices sold factory direct at wholesale pricing. We are discounting all inventory by 40%, that’s right, wholesale pricing direct to the skier, shipped from the factory with a little saw dust in every box. I don’t know, maybe you’d rather pay more? Or get less? We just can’t be sure anymore… so we are going to test out this new pricing from now until CYBER MONDAY.



Go get 'em!!

I was happy to read in that email, that there is still hope for a revised version of the custom build approach. With all potential caveats, e.g. (-10, +10 might not work, you might build it too soft, too stiff, topsheet is not what you hoped blah, blah) I still find it so much fun. It changed my whole perspective on what it meant to buy skis. I've been lucky with my builds, e.g. never bought something I didn't enjoy and over the years, I've learned a lot about how flex and width and materials impact a ski feel. I am definitely much more educated.

Secondly I think Thom mentioned it back a page or two, but I really like the idea of focusing on building and testing slight tweaks to a fewer number of the raddest shapes at different waist widths (a little more like ON3P. It would take a lot of the guinea pig stress off the customer, and give you piece of mind that whatever miner tweaks that were required to a move a shape into a different waist width were addressed.

As far as marketing/classifying the skis another route that might work is classifying the skis the way a lot of us do for our quivers, e.g. New Snow, Day after, Hard Days, Tour e.g

Storms Days: Protest 128, Quixote 116, GPO 116 . Concept 116
Day or Two After: GPO 108, Quixote 108, Concept 108, Piste Jib 109
Harder Days: Piste Jib 99, 9D8. SnD, Park n Ride
Tour: Protest Tour 118, Backcountry, Yeti, EXP


Anyways just some thoughts. Hope Praxis pulls through this time. They've had a huge impact on my snow sliding activities

Considering a 3 ski quiver from Praxis and wanted to ask for advice. I originally was considering On3p, but Praxis appeals to me a little more.

Average skier, came to it too late in life, ski at Targhee and Jackson, aspiring to start skiing backcountry. 5'11" 200lbs (fat trying to get back to athletic.)

Hoping those with more knowledge of the skis could help me with the following that I am considering-

Firm Days/between storms/skiing with the better half- trying to decide between the MVP on 9D8's
Storm Days/Day or two after- GPO
Pow skis- Protest

Also, looking at either Pivots (if budget allows) or STH2's for bindings, or would it be worth splurging on shifts for either the MVP's or GPO's? (likelihood of touring much is slim so probably 80/20 at best).

Truly firm days or groomer days: 9d8 > MVP
I've owned both.

+1, MVP is much better on a medium pow day/1-2 days after. for groomers/hardpack, go with the 9D8 or a Piste Jib if you like Playful.

Or actually that new Experimental ski looks pretty badass as the skinny spot in your quiver!

PJ and MVP complement each other nicely. MVP works great for chopped pow imo or untracked up to around 10’’, it’s a great pow ski for its width. I own PJ and MVP.

What exactly do you want out of each ski? Playful, charger, surfy, etc.

For what it’s worth, I prefer pivots on skis up to 115mm waist and attack 13/16 for powder skis. Weight savings and ease of stepping into them in powder worth it for the attacks then


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lockha31

I don't ski switch or spin, but like drops. Like to ski fast on groomers, working on getting faster and smoother in cut up bumped up snow

---

GPO in the standard build will kill it. Its outstanding on groomers for its size. Incredibly quick and easy to turn in pow and cut up. It's the one ski I own that I think I'd enjoy two versions of. I have carbon map 187, which is awesome, but I have gotten used to the truck-ability of the heavy cores keith was making.
I'd keep the 187's as more of hiking and skinning ski, and get some heavy core veneer 182s, for bashing around our little hills on snowy days.

I don't know your height/weight, but if you are used to 185 ish skis, of all the praxis skis I own (Protest, GPO, Q, Concept, PJ) the GPOs ski shortest by far. I'm guessing I could easily ski the 192 in bigger terrain. My one 182 Quixotes, feel longer on my feet than my 187 GPO.

Not sure what happened to my reply to MD, but I am working on getting to a more charging style, but like surfy. I don't ski switch or spin, but like drops. Like to ski fast on groomers, working on getting faster and smoother in cut up bumped up snow. Like skiing trees and appreciate something nimble. Targhee gets great soft snow, but isnt really steep at all. Want to ski more over in Jackson this winter to get better at steeper bigger terrain.

Currently skiing on 184 BC Atris probably should have ordered one size up, though a fun ski, for a DD. 185 JJ Zero for powder days, fun ski in fresh snow, don't care for it once it is tracked out and bumped up, maybe would have been better to get the 195's.

If your goal on firm days is to bounce down the mountain and play around, PJ or MVP for firm days. If you want a locked in beer league racer, 9d8 or freeride. Pick your waist size. Agree with shu’s comments about the gpo. That’s a great ski for anything 2 days after a storm up to 10”. Protest for anything deeper.

The GPO really is an incredible ski. I feel like it got lost in the luster of the asym quixote, but that’s my favorite praxis design. In a waist size/class where there is steep competition, it still stands out to me.

Edit: grammar and autocorrect

The three praxis skis I own are:

184 Piste Jibs

182 Quixotes (heavy/veneer/carbon)

192 Protests

I haven’t skied the piste jibs yet but they’re a pretty straightforward design so I’m sure I’ll like them. Easy fun playful ski for groomers, messing around off features around the mountain, bump and tree skiing

Qs I love - sizing down (I owned 187 GPOs) really makes the skis quick to pivot and throw sideways, but the design gravitates towards fast surfy fall line skiing too. Very stable. Awesome resort ski for chopped up snow and variable. Only downside to sizing down is the decrease in float in pow - but that’s why I have protests

I personally thought the gpos were a great do it all ski, but the Qs are more fun. They love a fast line but are very easy to shut down and surfy if you ski with a center ball of foot type style


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lockha31

Considering a 3 ski quiver from Praxis and wanted to ask for advice. I originally was considering On3p, but Praxis appeals to me a little more.

Average skier, came to it too late in life, ski at Targhee and Jackson, aspiring to start skiing backcountry. 5'11" 200lbs (fat trying to get back to athletic.)

Hoping those with more knowledge of the skis could help me with the following that I am considering-

Firm Days/between storms/skiing with the better half- trying to decide between the MVP on 9D8's
Storm Days/Day or two after- GPO
Pow skis- Protest

Also, looking at either Pivots (if budget allows) or STH2's for bindings, or would it be worth splurging on shifts for either the MVP's or GPO's? (likelihood of touring much is slim so probably 80/20 at best).

---

9D8 low snow (haven’t skied only recommending on reputation)

188 Quixote’s - great storm day or a few day after ski for Jackson/Gee

Protests

That’s what I’d get if I was looking at Praxis only. If you wanted to mix and match I’d go:

184 Kastle MX 98 (I’d you can find a pair)
18X K2 Marksman 108 TI
188 Quixote or 192 Armada ARV JJ or 193 Volkl Shiro

Any day I grab my Protests at Jackson, I’d usually be fine with something 115-120 underfoot, but I do really like them when the getting is good.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

Buy Concepts. They’ll handle everything.
But buy Protests too, because Protests.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

^^^^^ Sage advice right here

Quote:

---

I personally thought the gpos were a great do it all ski, but the Qs are more fun. They love a fast line but are very easy to shut down and surfy if you ski with a center ball of foot type style

---

Agree. I’m in the process of reducing my ten? pairs of Praxii down to 5 (I have a mix of resort vs BC, Tele vs Alpine, so don’t judge me) and I’m torn on whether to sell the GPO 192 or the Quixote 194s. For me the GPO remains the most versatile, and I tend to reach for it when traveling somewhere, so there may be a pair of minty Quixotes on gear swap despite the fun factor in the right conditions.