Maher's advice seems better than Peterson's:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hV2qiH2gxQs
Maher's advice seems better than Peterson's:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hV2qiH2gxQs
Trae nailed itQuote:
Originally Posted by KQ
Anyone could in theory be an incel - but seems like a stretch that this wealthy Ivy League educated guy was celibate involuntarily. Guy dropped his disguise to flirt! Where the fuck are people getting “this guy is an incel” vibes?
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...5a24f15d9b.jpg
yeah I've heard those numbers but I was trying not to exaggerateQuote:
Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn
DQuote:
Originally Posted by Dantheman
E
N
N
I
S
This was where that came from.
https://nypost.com/2024/12/10/us-new...landlord-says/
And being physically attractive doesnt mean someone will swimming in pussy if their personality is shit or if they simply lack any sexual confidence. Women smell lack of confidence and are turned off.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bennymac
I suspect the salaries of US doctors also drives up the salaries of Canadian doctors in order to try and retain them - this plus a bit of “brain drain” of doctors moving to the US for that high pay adds both financial stress to Canada’s universal system and lowers the number of doctors available to work in Canada.
Did you read the article you linked? Being disabled from back pain is not a lack of confidenceQuote:
Originally Posted by The Nuclear Option
I see how you can look at that clip and jump to such a conclusion. It's intentionally quoted in that way.Quote:
Originally Posted by bennymac
What he is talking about is both fascinatingly complex, at least from what I can tell. I've actually listened to a lot of his lectures, and never heard him use that term in particular. I have heard him describe the destablizing effects of polygamy and broken families. As near as I can tell, that is a quote from some NYT interview from 6 years ago from a reporter who was out for him, then cropped for maximum contextual distrotion.
Again, enforced monogomy is not "making women be with men," it is outlawing polygamy. But the journalist was looking for an opportunity to find a place to sink in the dagger since she was a radical feminist and viewed Peterson as, in her words, "the guardian of the patriarchy."
A quick google yielded this:
https://www.jordanbpeterson.com/medi...rced-monogamy/
He is certainly hated by some progressives for non-adherence to "the current thing."Quote:
Originally Posted by JP
https://magazine.columbia.edu/articl...dicine-forever
How a Cocaine-Addicted Surgeon Changed Medicine Forever
Oh there's a mention in a wiki article??? That's the ultimate evidence! Discussion is over.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mazderati
JP has been married for 35 years, has a grown child, and promotes traditional family relationships. He is the literal opposite of red pill/black pill incels. He would certainly tell you that he would hope his words help guide incels away from their misguided ideology and toward what he views as a better traditional life with traditional relationships.
Of course, that won't stop some incel from cherry picking or misinterpreting something from him to justify the opposite of his intent. And it certainly won't stop a radical feminist from then conlfating him with misogynistic incels.
Doesn't married for 35 years=incel?
Found the incel.Quote:
Originally Posted by summit
JFC. Kermit Peterson is a walking definition of 'unfuckable'. He's insufferable. He's boring AF. Tries so hard to be provocative to compensate for lack of substance. The only way he'd be involved in getting a women wet is by being punched in the face by a better man. Which is almost anyone.
I find it surreal that anyone takes him seriously - which, interestingly, seems to only be a claim from the lonely and/or Incels but not women.
When someone says ‘This is where the government was supposed to step in, but didn’t’, there some additional context:Quote:
Originally Posted by Danno
Attachment 507163
Attachment 507164
Maybe it shouldn’t have gotten this far, but that CEO himself helped drive it this far.
After more than a decade of being harassed by lefty activists and celebrated and paid handsomely by the right, his actions and words have certainly skewed towards inflammatory-right in recent years and his self importance has inflated dramatically.Quote:
Originally Posted by summit
That said, his view on men, as i understand them, is more along the lines of "lets not forget that young men have mental/emotional struggles too, and instead of minimizing those struggles and forgetting them, I want to talk about them and help these guys". The fact that he was/is focused on the mental health and struggles of males, in an era of Me-Too and female/minority empowerment struck many people as too close to "All-Lives-Matter". So he was seen as a villain in many left circles, and many of his speaking engagements and interviews are with "hostile" interviewers/crowds.
So when he was talking to this "hostile" interviewer, and he makes a passionate point about why he thinks some men are having a real mental/emotional struggles, the interviewer laughs. That is A) rude, and B) the kind of condescension that he is familiar with coming from his "opponents' during these type of "hostile" engagements. I can sympathize a bit with this as i have an in-law family member who holds some angry feminist anti-men views that i have had to talk seriously with my wife about her access to my son for teaching him things like "boo men, all men suck", and "men are the worst"... and genearlly being very freely disparaging of men in general, etc.
And IDK why we are talking about incels here. There is no possible world where Luigi doesnt slay.
And that doesn’t account for PAC and SuperPac donations.Quote:
Originally Posted by J. Barron DeJong
He's self-important and uses 200 words to describe something when he could have used 2. It's no wonder summit is a fan.Quote:
Originally Posted by CarlMega
This.Quote:
Originally Posted by CarlMega
Who the fuck would listen to him, or value his opinion?
All true ^^ but please let’s not turn this into a JP thread.
Maybe he was more interesting when he was an addict?Quote:
Originally Posted by CarlMega
But seriously, insufferable is the perfect word.
It doesn't seem to take much to be considered an intellectual these days [See also: Ben Shapiro]
Why wouldnt Jordan Peterson qualify as an intellectual? Phd from McGill in clinical Psychology, Proff at Harvard and UofToronto, published author in his field, actively participating and debating in current discussion within his field of expertise, etc. What would you consider passing for an intellectual?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ted Striker
Ben shapiro, i understand your point. Really smart guy, but he is just a really smart guy who makes a living off gaslighting and then out lawyering/debating. Not interested or active in the study of anything in particular other than how to drum up opposition rage and then win a debate with them.
JP is the Andy Kaufman of "intellectuals". Same schtick...
You are disqualified when you change your line of work to being a professional guest on doofus podcasts.
Shapiro studied at Harvard (Law). He's a polemic dude, not an academic.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ted Striker
JP is a PhD Psychologist with post-doc fellowship and extensive research leadership, academics, and clinical practice for over 3 decades, including exctensive research publications at Harvard and Univ of Toronto, where he became a full professor. So, I'd say he is the a prototypical intellectual.
Generally you are an bitter and unpleasant person who reflects that misery in your posts. But every once in a while, you are correct and it is quite funny too. Like here, on all points.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mazderati
You hatred is pretty passionate... where is that coming from? Your violent imagry probably says something here... but if you want evidence he had sex more than once, he does have two children.Quote:
Originally Posted by CarlMega
I have no idea if he and his wife were attractive people 35 years ago when they got married, but if his daughter is any measure, probably they were.
Attachment 507173
I find his discussion of human behavioralism, personality, particularly maladaptive personality traits, fascinating. I think that is what I've heard him talk about most. I tried reading one of his books and found it not so great, but I very much wasn't the target audience (it was definitely written for young people, young men in particular; that is his target audience). I tend to find him insufferable when he gets outside of pyschology and sociology and into spiritualism/religion.
Ha! That's a good oneQuote:
Originally Posted by I Skied Bandini Mountain
^Love it
Broadly, you're way dumber and easier to manipulate than you think you are.Quote:
Originally Posted by summit
Please don't quote summit.
this thread was consistently hilarious for a while, then became a non-stop snoozefest for pages, and now is back to being sometimes hilarious.
Mikaela has way better pics where she is older than 15. Odd choice
The amount of time certain individuals have dedicated to this thread is concerning.Quote:
Originally Posted by Danno
Ok, Jordan has sold me and I will join his Joker church:
https://x.com/tallbart/status/154772...sR_NcRK2VkCfkg
Doctor of clinical psychology who did his masters thesis on alcoholism doesn’t understand risks of benzo addiction.
Instead of “cleaning his own room” and owning up to anxiety issues, possibly making the world better by helping others suffering drug and alcohol addiction, the self proclaimed paragon of personal responsibility blames doctors and food issues.
Travels to Russia for mystery treatment. Wakes up suspiciously more aggressive in ideology blaming wokeism for society’s problems.
Yeah, fuck that guy with a spiked baseball bat.
Attachment 507175
I'll just leave this here.
Looks about right
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
His shtick lame and transparent. Undeserving of our attention. He resonates exclusively with people whose company I personally wouldn't want to be be included.Quote:
Originally Posted by summit
Hey, I get it, you're impressed. I'm not. To me, he'll always be the Russell Brand of Ben Shapiros.
Back on point, JP is the hero of Incels and disaffected dorks regardless of his convoluted and strained 'enforced monogamy' spiel. He's definitely no authority on how to conduct yourself with regards to women or how to be an attractive partner.
Murder ballads dropping fast and furious.
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8NycyLx/