Rossignol Black Ops?

Loving those Sender Free 118 with the Strives. Great color combo!
That weight should be good and probably a hair lighter swingweight than a BO 118 at the same weight. They’d probably be similar in feel to my latest BO 118 set at 2445gr average.

Bet there will be more difference between different pairs of the Blackops 118 or Sender Free 118 than between those 2 models. Still lots of heavy models of SF 118 it seems and only ones that I’ve seen around 2400gr have been the original BO 118.

Felt I could tell a difference between the latest set and my old set that were 2520gr/2475gr and I moved back a hair(.25”) on the mount.
Forumskiers were indeed around 2530gr each and less than 10gr between left and right iirc.

Forumskier-You’ll have to go on Soothski.com and compare the flex patterns of the BO 98/BO 118/K2 Poacher.
BO 98 in even the 182cm is stiffer everywhere(similar tip/tail) than the 184cm Poacher and the 192cm even more so. The BO 118 is just stiffer tip/tail than the 182cm BO 98 but similar everywhere else. The 192cm BO 98 similar tip/tail but stiffer everywhere else vs the 186cm BO 118.

Think the 192cm BO 98 will vastly outcarve the Poacher but will be very forgiving in bumps like the BO 118. I’d use forgiving flex vs your loose description of what you’d get in the BO 98 in bumps etc.
Skis like a Prodigy 2.0 or especially Poacher with its increased taper and rocker will be definitely easier to pivot but will much less precision on edge than the BO 98.
Good mix of a Mantra type ski with a twin tip.

The 21 Faction CT 2.0 was your “Monster 98 twin tip” with its almost 2400gr weight in the 188cm/186cm tape length. They haul!
Even the 183cm/181cm tape CT 2.0 are 2300gr.

As the original Renegade reviewer I think I'm qualified to compare to BO118.

In a funny twist of fate, the last pow day of the season in St Anton on the BO118 was almost 10 years after I had a very similar day on the OG Renegade, on the the exact same runs (might have been their last great powder day).

Both with 3 feet of snow and dense. The day of the Renegades was maybe a little more upside down. I can still remember it like it was yesterday...

I would say the biggest difference between the two isn't the camber, but the shape. Renegades are straight with taper, BO semi-straight with no taper. Renegades ski sideways and BO rides the edge.

In practice this doesn't really change all that much about how you ski them. BO is still pretty straight and not twitchy or carvy, super easy to redirect, but they don't really drift.

Like that day 10 years ago, so many of my greatest renegade moments have been seared into my memory. That drift is heaven.

But what you give up in drift, you gain by having monster trucks under your feet.

I had to give up on the Renegades because in fucked euro snow, they were too harsh. EHPs got picked more, then the Kusalas basically replaced them.

Now, some of my new favorite memories with the BO are about pulling Gs across the fall line, and not giving a fuck how much speed I pick up. No need to break out of edges, just go fast and flow.

My thought about the BO camber vs the Renegade, in dense snow, it's like there is no camber. Fat tips, fat tails, easy flex in the middle, camber is not something I think about. The times where I caught a crust under the powder and hooked up would be the only concern, but that was more of a tune and ski awareness thing (also shape related). So you can think of a camber as an essential part of the "suspension", but I could abandon my old caveman logic, "camber? bad!"

Because they are so symmetrical, and the mount point is so forward, I don't think the Renegade has much advantage in the speed department. Pintails suck, plowing around like a bass boat with a massive outboard motor. Parallel to the snow makes you fast, and BO can do that. When the tips go under do the samurai sword Renegade tips help? Sure. But even in dense snow I wasn't feeling much snag with my BO tips. Even the Renegades weren't as good as the EHPs.

Like the others mentioned, they are not trampolines. I don't think you could have that incredible damp feeling and still keep a lot of rebound. But they do respond when you load them up. If you hit a pow bump at medium speed they would pop you higher than the OG renegades, at high speed the renegades might flex enough to best them.

What I like about the rebound is that it's easy bending, but you feel it. Like if you load the tails, the camber goes away easily, but it eases you into it. So when you want to use that loading to get back forward, it always available. The renegade you have to roll back to a set point before the tails start to load.

So are they better than the renegade? No. Yes. Maybe. But they have the same newskool freeride DNA, so it's not like you need to adjust too much.

Attachment 494178
Pucon, Chile - "Big Bang" Freestyle Fest - 2010. Note the white bases. Pre-production pair #29. This was the first (and only) pair of skis I've ever paid full retail for. 4frnt hooked it up early for the southern Winter (thanks Jeremy!)

Oh, and these where mounted in Chile which was a mega-fucking-mistake, and after the first mount blew out, they were mounted at -3 from TC and they ruled. Until they ripped out again motorcrossing under the Sublette chair (zen and the art of mogul motocross), then I got pair #87 which was just never quite as good.

Awesome write-up, JRainey. I appreciate the in-depth thoughts. Now, to put your imagination through an exercise in hypotheticals... can you imagine choosing the BO over the Ren in a Japanese forest of untouched snow where the majority of turns are drifting at speed?

I'm really splitting hairs here. BO seems like a cool ski, though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gaijin

Awesome write-up, JRainey. I appreciate the in-depth thoughts. Now, to put your imagination through an exercise in hypotheticals... can you imagine choosing the BO over the Ren in a Japanese forest of untouched snow where the majority of turns are drifting at speed?

I'm really splitting hairs here. BO seems like a cool ski, though.

---

The renegade is one of my favorite skis and I’ve skied the BO a lot too. I would never take the BO to japan over the ren.

That’s my hunch.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

If I was dealing with deep snow where I wasn't really hitting the bottom I would say renegades. I don't even care if there's a track or two to cross. It's more about does the snow provide the suspension.

If you having to rally crud and luge tracks in and out of said deep snow fields, then I think the blackops would increase the percentage of the decent that was dreamy.

I don't really ski tracked out snow on powder days as I'm in early and out early, in a place with low competition. So I don't need a pure powder ski that's a crud destroyer. We are just generally dealing with harder base surfaces and a lot sluff debris in runouts. The rossis (SF110 and BO118) have really increased the comfort level when it's 5cm on top of that old sluff debris. But the crud performance of the BO was so good, I'll gladly ski it during the dryer times where I'm "milking it".

I would stay if you're looking for something more forgiving without feeling less substantial, the blackops are it.

I can't say this enough, they are soft in the strangest and best possible way. They hand flex stiff, yet they are super easy to bend while skiing (all the way under the binding), but you could ski through soft avi debris at 45mph and not even flinch (and hard avi debris and survive).

I had a blast reconnecting with the latest version of the Hoji this year, and would actually like to try the new renegade as they seem like real floaters. I need to remount my OGs if I want to ski them (GW and Longer BSL), but I think I might go for it for next season, not needed, but just too feel young again.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gaijin

That’s my hunch.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

---

BO118s are definitely not the skis I'm going to grab if I know it's deep untracked. The opposite. I grab them when I know it's going to be tracked, and turning into mashed potato piles. Or when it's soft, but not deep. I usually end up finding some untracked lines with them, and they do fine, but they aren't anything special in those conditions.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Crystal Skier

A lot of old poacher and shreditor fans out there…


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

---

I'm now debating which 184 Reckoner to go with. If I like both Shreditor 112 and BO 118, would you recommend the old Reckoner 112, the new 110, or the new KF?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by forumskier

I'm now debating which 184 Reckoner to go with. If I like both Shreditor 112 and BO 118, would you recommend the old Reckoner 112, the new 110, or the new KF?

---

112/110…

will shoot ya s pm later. My KF’s were sold a while back.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

Just scored a pair of used BO118s with one mount and 9.5/10 bases and edges for $220. Pretty stoked.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dantheman

Just scored a pair of used BO118s with one mount and 9.5/10 bases and edges for $220. Pretty stoked.

---

Daaaamn! Nice score!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dantheman

Just scored a pair of used BO118s with one mount and 9.5/10 bases and edges for $220. Pretty stoked.

---

Cowabunga dude!

man, I just scored a pair of the OG BO118 for 200 bucks - new and undrilled. I am not gonna lie - pretty damned excited just about now :)

Do I need them? Hell no. But it sure will be interesting to try them b2b with the swamps :)

Too bad they did not have any panther BO98 182s in stock...

Damn, nice! Gotta love summer ski scoring.

I finally gave them a proper fondling yesterday. Lots more camber and rocker than my Squads. Really curious to find out how these ski.

Anyone want to save the trouble of searching back through the thread for mount point advice?

I'm at -3.5cm from true center and I love them there. They feel balanced, but surprisingly drivable. They definitely can be over driven in a few circumstances, but that comes with the territory and it's better than expected. Very predictable.

I believe the general consensus from non-switch skiers, is to go at least 1cm further back than I did.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dantheman

Anyone want to save the trouble of searching back through the thread for mount point advice?

---

most people mount them at -2 from rec, so -4.4 from true center. I run them there and they ski great. Remember to detune the rockered sections.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kid-kapow

man, I just scored a pair of the OG BO118 for 200 bucks - new and undrilled. I am not gonna lie - pretty damned excited just about now :)

Do I need them? Hell no. But it sure will be interesting to try them b2b with the swamps :)

Too bad they did not have any panther BO98 182s in stock...

---

nice score KaPow! All black OG’s stealth factor alone is worth the price haha. You’ll like em better than the Swamps. Dibs if ya change your mind and decide not to mount. You’re mounting in the same location as your Swamps for science I presume?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Crystal Skier

You’re mounting in the same location as your Swamps for science I presume?

---

yup - for science!

I am based in scandiland aka Norway, so you are probably better off trying to source a pair locally - or pick up some ON3P Jeff 118s :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kid-kapow

most people mount them at -2 from rec, so -4.4 from true center. I run them there and they ski great. Remember to detune the rockered sections.

---

Perfect, thanks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kid-kapow

man, I just scored a pair of the OG BO118 for 200 bucks - new and undrilled. I am not gonna lie - pretty damned excited just about now :)

Do I need them? Hell no. But it sure will be interesting to try them b2b with the swamps :)

Too bad they did not have any panther BO98 182s in stock...

---

Wondering if the waist width increased ever so modestly between the OG Black Ops
and now the Swamps etc. Maybe you could let us know? Was told they were laying these originals up in the race dept. Did not want to mess up a race room edge finish on the pair I received. Never had a thought to go back from the line even though it seemed so far forward. They were fantastic there and absolutely tenacious for their width. Uber surprising. Expect really good things.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

Should be not much difference between the OG Blackops 118 vs as the only difference will be some had metal underfoot vs the ABS now. The swamps seem to average a bit more weight vs the OG but all other dimensions etc are the same.
So maybe a lighter pair vs heavier pair of swamps should be the same difference as a OG 118 vs average swamps I bet.

I’d move mount back based on weight for direction skiers. About -2cm for 160lbs, -2.5cm area for 180lbs and -3cm plus for those over 200lbs seem to be good recs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mr_pretzel

The renegade is one of my favorite skis and I’ve skied the BO a lot too. I would never take the BO to japan over the ren.

---

Rens are "best day of my life" skis. Sure, I've skied them on days that were so-so, but when it really hits right, you're on your game and skiing Rens, magic happens. Man, I love them (I'm on the current ski).

I'm BO curious. My monster truck ski is the Line Blade Optic 114. I haven't fallen totally in love with it. Kinda moved on to the Deathwish late last year. I always wonder if these 2300+ gram skis are just too much for my 160lbs, but I'm always on the hunt for skis that crush tracked out Sierra pow. For now, the Deathwish is pretty impressive for a lighter ski.

I keep hearing about that BO magic......

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SnowMachine

Rens are "best day of my life" skis. Sure, I've skied them on days that were so-so, but when it really hits right, you're on your game and skiing Rens, magic happens. Man, I love them (I'm on the current ski).

I'm BO curious. My monster truck ski is the Line Blade Optic 114. I haven't fallen totally in love with it. Kinda moved on to the Deathwish late last year. I always wonder if these 2300+ gram skis are just too much for my 160lbs, but I'm always on the hunt for skis that crush tracked out Sierra pow. For now, the Deathwish is pretty impressive for a lighter ski.

I keep hearing about that BO magic......

---

Moment Chipotle Banana

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SnowMachine

I'm BO curious. My monster truck ski is the Line Blade Optic 114. I haven't fallen totally in love with it. Kinda moved on to the Deathwish late last year. I always wonder if these 2300+ gram skis are just too much for my 160lbs, but I'm always on the hunt for skis that crush tracked out Sierra pow. For now, the Deathwish is pretty impressive for a lighter ski.

I keep hearing about that BO magic......

---

What length Blade Optic 114 are you on? I'm on the 186 and they feel like a Mini Cooper whereas the Black Ops 118 feels like a Humvee. For Sierra pow, the Black Ops 118 would be a great choice.