Arild; as I skied my R105s last weekend I imagined a R113 would be really cool.
Almost same ski as the 105s, perhaps a tiny bit more rise in the tail, a 8,5 flex. And 27-28m TR.
Obviously a different ski than a true FL114 v2, but would perhaps sell more? But also be overlapping with RC116…
Marshal (probably)has something in the works resembling that. Wait, wtf am I saying? That's basically the rc116.Quote:
Originally Posted by sf
Sent fra min Pixel 8 Pro via Tapatalk
The v2 I've never drawn even once is 133/111/122. Also never drawn is that the sidecut and tapers have been getting makeovers.
Sent fra min Pixel 8 Pro via Tapatalk
Yeah, probably. Just something with that r105 that worked for me. Either the ski, the tune or the mount point (or all) really felt so intuitiveQuote:
Originally Posted by arild
I can see what you mean. If there ever was a more soft snow oriented r105, the 116 is it. Nevermind the radius; it's decidedly quicker, with a shorter EE and more tail taper, than the R105s. [emoji846]Quote:
Originally Posted by sf
Sent fra min Pixel 8 Pro via Tapatalk
You’re kinda describing the [emoji637][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji640] R [emoji637][emoji637][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]]]Quote:
Originally Posted by sf;[emoji[emoji6[emoji640
Sent from my iPhone using [emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji640][emoji638][emoji638][emoji638]]TGR Forums