Printable View
So parents shouldn’t have them on their laps either? It’s probably parents doing most of that molesting, pervy fuckers.Quote:
Originally Posted by JimmyCarter
Everyone is afraid of everything these days. Yeah bad shit happens but mostly it doesn’t. My youngest daughter asked me why I didn’t seem to be afraid of anything and I told her there’s nothing to be afraid of.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
And then everyone applauded!Quote:
Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn
Really there’s nothing to worry about that you have control over, but at 98 I can see why you’re scared.Quote:
Originally Posted by JimmyCarter
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
A strong breeze can fuck me up these daysQuote:
Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn
Let's keep propping up sex with minors so we can have generation after generation of future news articles and Padded Room content. This is the padded room, after all. And I'm getting wrung the fuck out for suggesting kids on the laps of their teachers is possibly not in the best interest of kids.
Quote:
The abused-abuser theory offers another model of pedophilic motivation. This suggests that a pedophile’s own history of childhood sexual abuse predisposes him or her to pedophilic tendencies. Indeed this is the one proposed etiological factor that has received robust support in the literature. Estimates of the incidence of childhood sexual abuse in pedophiles’ histories range from 40% up to 100%.15,16 Female offenders might have an even higher incidence of childhood sexual abuse.17 Moreover, pedophilic offenders have a higher incidence of childhood sexual abuse than do sexual offenders against older age-groups and nonsexual offenders.15,18 Finally, in a randomly selected sample of men living in the community, men who had reported multiple events of sexual contact in their own childhood were almost 40 times more likely to report having sexual contact with children 13 years and younger than men who reported no sexual abuse in childhood (0.2% vs 7.7%)
Thus, childhood sexual abuse appears to play an important role in the development of pedophilic tendencies. The underlying mechanism for this is not clear. Psychological processes, such as identification with the aggressor and normalization of adult-child sexual activity have been proposed.19 We have suggested that abuse sustained during early childhood may result in neurodevelopmental abnormalities that predispose to pedophilic sexual desire.
No you aren’t. One comment got some heat and It’s a hot fucking day out for us and people here like to argue. That’s all. People call me on my shit too and I’m glad they do.
Nice pivot from drag hysteria you started with.Quote:
Originally Posted by Trackhead
Nobody wants their kids on any adults laps unless they are friends or family, what’s your point here?
This one was fun..Quote:
Originally Posted by AK47bp
Attachment 464439
Oh noQuote:
Originally Posted by heckacali
Straight clowns are just as creepy and evil
Fuck clowns and their makeup
Not literally
Hard pass on clowns and queens
You walked in here attempting to burn a straw man and got called on it. Equating pedophilia and homosexuality with drag queens is no less problematic than the ghosts of horny teenagers posting lewd thoughts. This thread is a tragic comedy at best.Quote:
Originally Posted by Trackhead
Quote:
Originally Posted by SumJongGuy
Attachment 464459
I'm all for people getting their yayyas out, but doing drag in a public funded setting is sort of tasteless.
I don't think it's appropriate for any teacher. That or leather, whips and racks, emphasis on finance or religious haranguing follows.
Folks need to have their space and respect.
So, let the drag queens be. They're not necessarily gay or pedo.
At the same time, consider the conduct befitting a serious professional in a public funded setting.
Insufferable cunt says what?:tongue:Quote:
Originally Posted by ikonfreewasatch
what public funded drag are you talking about and is it really different than what happened at the globe theater hundreds of years ago?Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster Highmen
men pretending to be women for laughs has a long and recent history too.
Are people clamoring to cancel Mrs Doubtfire or White Chicks now?
Donny Berger is wondering what the hell happened to this thread.
If you have to ask, you've missed the points.Quote:
Originally Posted by ex-powderbroker
I'm referring to drag queen story time in public schools.
Schools are a public funded setting for example, compulsory for some.
Entertainment is not compulsory, it's by choice. So it's different.
Seems like that kind of unavoidable exposure to people that are different is EXACTLY what we need more of if you really want to increase understanding of people that are different from the “norm”
When I was a kid, attendance at the YoYo rally was required. That had a lot more of an effect on impressionable minds than uncle milty or Geraldine reading to the precious snowflakes
Personally, I don't have a problem with exposure to different ways of living. Though I don't think I'll attend any flat earth, qanon, nazi, Trump or furry rallies any time soon.
I do hope that's OK.
But for those opposed to an exposure, I'm not sure foisting those kinds of experiences on them is any way to convince them otherwise.
Thats what they said about segregation. But hmm, given trump/desantis/maga/etc. and where we are now, maybe you’re right ?!?
Are flat-earthers and nazis getting a lot of speaking gigs at schools and libraries?
you are right that if there are public funds going to speakers then it becomes part of the conversation of living in a society and how we spend money. to me an adult in costume reading Pete the Cat and singing songs with kids is not very threatening. And I could see the motivation, if a drag queen makes a kid laugh a time or two they would maybe be less predisposed to hate people that are different than them later on, and of course why that is a real problem for red hats.
Buster, If Robin Williams wanted to read to kids as Mrs. Doubtfire is it a problem? Or only if the performer comes off as more homosexual?
I am not happy to my tax dollars having gone to things like the Iraq War and subsidies for oil companies and stuff when the planet is on fire but I guess we all have to pick our battles and some people are really riled about this, I agree.
Schools have budgets and some discretion so if anyone does not want them make sure to go protest and take a lot of pics so we know.
I had a pretty serious crush on Miss Atkinson in the fourth grade. She was young, smart, single, drove a Volkswagen bug. She only taught that one year if I recall, I wonder what she is up to.
Popular refrain: Don’t want your kids exposed to drag queens? Don’t take them to drag shows.
Trackhead: I’m not taking my kids to drag shows.
TGR : You motherfucker!
If you know young kids, those kids being brought to drag story hour don't have a clue that they are at a drag story hour. They only know it's a lot more fun having a cartoon character read "THE VERY VERY FAR NORTH" than with the librarian or old lady volunteer reading it.
And any one who thinks any kid sitting on any lap is perverted has a dirty mind. IMHO.
this is america. gay people can get married, adopt kids, vote, put rainbow flags on their houses, and read books to kids.
love it or leave it.
And here is the foundation of the issue. Equating or even lumping drag into a similar category as nazi’s, flat Earthers, and furries.Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster Highmen
I hope you are just trying to make a point and don’t think like that.
They are all different ways of living, like he said.Quote:
Originally Posted by AK47bp
And sure Nazis are way off, but furries are awfully close…
Some of you are misconstruing what I wrote. ZZZ gets it.
I'm not equivocating drag queens with Nazis. Furries maybe. Sheesh people. My bad for assuming folks might have an inkling of where I'm coming from: get your yayas out as long as you don't impinge on other people's rights.
I'm trying to get at the issue of a person being forced into an environment that they're not interested in and one from which I doubt they'll gain much understanding. That's the theme, not the analogy of the environments.
If one listens to what the people that are objecting to the 'drag queen story hours' are saying, it's that they don't want that environment compulsory for them or their kids. And that forcing them is not likely to change their minds. Calling them deplorables won't convince them to vote D either.
As an ex-professor, I think it's unprofessional and tasteless to bring that part of your human experience into the classroom.
BTW, as rerereiterated, drag queens are not necessarily gay.
I can see where this is going, so I'll shut up for now.
edit: I don't think the segregation topic is analogous at all. There's a right to equal opportunity. I don't think there's much of a comparison with the right to cross dress in public funded settings.
What if we started Truman capote story hour?
Kinda catchy. And lispy.
Kids aren’t being forced to sit through story hour with drag queens, parents can opt out. That’s kinda like saying people were forced to get the covid vaccine, no one was forced, you make a choice. If it means losing your job that was your choice. The same people objecting to drag story hour are objecting to history, science etc. it is a step backwards for public education. If you have a problem with the drag story hour then you have a problem with recess, PE, art and field trips etc.
Don’t want your kids to be exposed to the evil world then homeschool them, we know how those kids turn out most of the time.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
The thread is now a fine example of social discussion and the willingness to listen to both sides dispassionately with complete respect for one another's POV and if unsure asking for clarification.
America 2023.
I think that this stupid thread, which is kind of distasteful, took a turn with the post about kindergartners and drag queens kind of out of the blue. It was a post that didn’t really have anything to do with the topic but rather a current hot issue for conservatives. Maybe I’m wrong, I’m willing to listen if someone has a cogent argument but this really made no sense in relation to this thread.
Still on tangent, I’m not sure what the specific issue is with drag, do ignorant people think it will turn their kids gay or do they think all drag queens are gay and that all gay men are pedophiles? Most of the time pedophiles are flying under the radar and appear normal at least superficially. I’d be more worried about the outwardly appearing heterosexual teacher taking special interest in kids not the drag queen reading stories with everyone watching.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
We homeschooled ours until she wanted to go back to public school. She has an eyesight disability that makes reading difficult. We yanked her out of public school in 4th grade due to bullying.Quote:
Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn
3.97 stem and ap classes. She r00lz.
And I think you're wrong about the optionality of the drag queen story hour. Public funds have been spent on them: https://nypost.com/2022/06/11/over-2...t-nyc-schools/ ..
I don't mind the issue and don't have a problem if my kids are exposed to it. I just think that if others don't want their kids exposed to it, they should have that right.
the nyc school budget for last year was 37 billion.Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster Highmen
what other groups received money?
how many shows is that?
can you explain why is this a big deal and parents should have the right to pull kids?
evolution?
war of northern aggression?
is everything a la carte?
I think I've got to agree with you on this point. I didn't realize some of these events had been publicly funded and required. That almost seems like trying to shove it in the faces of those who oppose it. If parents want to take their kids to drag story hours that's one thing, but I can't really see a good reason for making it effectively part of the curriculum.Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster Highmen