There's a connection, obviously, but you do see how those lines cross each other and don't have the same average slope, right?
Printable View
More description of the plan and it’s goals here:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-...-need-it-most/
Without checking his work I'm going with: more households than borrowers and cutting the principle by some finite number less than $20k only brings down borrowers' monthly payments by whatever the monthly payment was on that. If 10% of households save $50/month....
That's far less offensive, but still a poor analogy.
This is like "if you happen to be on welfare this week, you get an extra $2000. But if you were on welfare last week, or next week, too bad, because no reason, and who care about what is causing people to be on welfare."
People on welfare didn't usually choose to be on welfare.
People paying student debt are likely to have a degree and thus they tend to make more than, and be on welfare less than, people who didn't go to college.
Welfare is progressive. This is regressive without actually solving the underlying problem.
Just curious?…..
-is a Pell Grant the same as a Stafford Loan?….or Stafford would only be $10,000?/ or nothing at all.
-Are students currently in college that have current Stafford loans eligible for this plan? Or is this plan only for people who already have graduated?
-The Forgiveness is if the “family” (combined) income is less than 125,000?….or is it that the individual student is earning less than $125,000?
Sorry….Lots of questions….
Another economic genius weighing in:
Attachment 424627
https://twitter.com/paulkrugman/stat...rF0dpR8XLOD2Yg
"Don't worry: if it causes inflation the Fed can just raise interest rates even more because it is like totally under control right now with no consequences from the interest rates!"
Remind me who inflation fucks first? Right. The poorest take it the hardest.
I should have said "strongly correlated", but you got the idea.
RE: The cancer analogy- if the entity with the press release about the new treatment for cancer is also one of the primary entities causing cancer, celebrating said new treatment is a bit short sighted, no?
I have no problem with debt forgiveness for people who were taken advantage of. I have a major concern with where the funding for said forgiveness comes from and how the responsible parties will be held accountable to change their practices going forward.
Life isn’t fair summit.
There is no perfect solution.
FWIW, I don’t have dog in this fight. I went to college in Canada, where/when it was affordable and didn’t take out loans.
I do have kids that will most likely go to college, but not for a decade, so getting costs under control going forward is much more relevant for me.
200B is his preferred number.
Reuters said $321B at least.
That is all public money. Is that where it should be spent?
Inflation is flat? "Don't piss on me and tell me it's rain." Inflation is high as fuck. Yea last glance it wasn't getting even worse, yay! Let's celebrate by spending $321B of taxpayer money to benefit a certain subset of the middle and upper class (but not too upper class)!" Free money! Vote in November!
For clarity, I'm getting $10k of debt cancelled, maybe $20k if my undergrad pell grants qualify me for 20k fed grad loans cancellation, and my employer pays the rest tax free. So this isn't a jealousy thing. I just don't think it is right.
Pell Grant is not the same as Stanford loan. Sounds like Stafford loan would be subject to the $10k limit.
Income limit is $125k for an individual, or $250k for married couple. Should apply to the student borrower, not the family of the student, I believe.
No idea if current students are eligible.
In June, Colorado Senator Bennet summed it up nicely.
We can think bigger.
Last month inflation was 0%. ‘NowCast’ estimate for August inflation is 0.09%. So yeah, inflation is currently flat.
Going forward, market expects average inflation of 2.77% over the next 5 years.
US GDP is 21 Trillion. Even $321B is a very small percentage when spread out over multiple years.
I like what he said:
"If you’re gonna spend $200 or $230 billion to cancel student loan debt, we need to do it in a way that reaches those who need it most and reforms the underlying system that got us here in the first place…otherwise, we’re simply passing along this injustice to another generation of college students." In his remarks, Bennet proposes efforts to help low- and middle-income borrowers, such as forgiving $10,000 of debt for households earning the state median income or less.
In CO that would be $40K, not $125K.