Still pussying out, then?
Printable View
The industry is already trending towards incorporating hi-viz colors into apparel and daytime running lights are becoming more popular by choice.
BUIs are not uncommon, especially in Boulder and Denver.
Regarding helmets, I'm sure your Jedi-like mastery of Google for helpful interweb argument statistics could yield hudge results, though perhaps contradictory. Some studies have found that helmets can encourage more risky behavior from cyclists, as well as influence drivers to pass more closely and drive more aggressively as the cyclist appears protected and armored.
But thanks for your concern.
Bogner has blinking lights in their gear now?
Hot shit.
Been here since '05 and still don't get it.
Yup, totally.
Good call. Anything to help you stay visible.
I had road bikes (motorcycles) for years and it was amazing how many people did not see me, but it is and was reality. Couldn't change it. Defensive riding is the way.
A dad on an adult trike with two kids hanging on the back (their heads were level to the dads ass) swerved in front of my car yesterday, going from the shoulder into my lane only going about 5mph in a 35mph? zone, in order for him to miss a pothole. I think the doofus hipster dad was drunk because that was the craziest thing I've seen a biker do in a long time. Sun was setting so I couldn't even see the biker very well but I was able to slam on the brakes. Was on 2700 South in SLC, a pretty fast/busy road. No helmets on anyone.
In other news, I made a really bad move driving yesterday where I was yelling at myself in the car, because I was so stupid, and the fact my 2 year old was in the car made everything worse. So whatever. We all make bad moves at some point, in a car or on a bike.
Not that this has anything to do with the dumbass on the trike (I'm chalking that up to Utarded Parental Entitlement Syndrome rather than DCES)...but it brings up an interesting example.
I'm basically at 2700S and 1700E. 2700S is a great example of a street that should reduce its speed limit to 25. Between 1300E and 2000E there are 2 elementary schools and a church and multiple signed/painted crosswalks that are rarely acknowledged by drivers, since most are pushing 40mph.
And it actually is a 30mph street, not 35; but you'd never know it based on driver behavior and a few hard-to-spot signs.
It's a busy cyclist corridor (commuting and recreational) as its the only decent East/West route for a mile or two in either direction. You'll often see cyclists in the middle of the downhill Westbound lane, since the bike lane-ish/parking lane is full of giant potholes and other wheel smashing uneven pavement good times. It's a big utility corridor too, so it constantly gets torn up in random little spots.
I "Neighborhood Pace Car" the shit out of it multiple times a day, and watch people lose their shit in my rear view. I haven't been passed yet, but I've seen some aborted attempts.
That's a tough one. Do we blame the sense of entitlement on him being a cyclist, 60 something, or a lawyer? Or all of the above. (Are you sure he's a real lawyer? Real lawyers don't make idle threats, they just carry them out without warning you.)
The way you "name" streets in SLC is fucked up.
So the trike guy lives near you then, it happened a few blocks from there. I know that road well, I always think my shocks are blown when I drive on it. They need to pave it, that would solve a lot of issues. It's jarring in my car, never mind on my bike. I commute with thick-ish tires so I don't have to go in the middle of the road though.
That is so true with headlights. The red flashing may be annoying, but the ones I've seen are not blinding, so I think those are a good thing. Last year a women was walking on the road and shined her LED flashlight right at my windshield and held it there. I couldn't see anything. Light angle is key.
Or, you know, you could wait anywhere from 30 seconds to a minute or two until there are good enough sight lines to pass safely for all involved.
Yes, you'll be going marginally slower for a little while. Does it really matter? Other than the sense of frustration (I get it, I drive a car too), what's the harm?
A road lane is probably anywhere from 8 feet to 14 feet wide. Assuming the bike is a foot or two off the fog line on the right, you'd still be hard pressed to pass with three feet of room (that's the law here in California and some other states) without going into an oncoming lane.
There's no difference one vs. two in terms of safety. To pass, you still have to go into the oncoming lane. If you pass even one cyclist without going halfway over into the oncoming lane, you're an asshole. Would you pass your child like that? No? Then don't do it to someone else's.
It just makes you more angry that they could be doing something that gets in your way. Recognize that.
Are you a robot asking how humans feel? You really don't know the answer? Are you a monk?
Why is there a reoccurring comment in this thread on how cars pass with 3 feet of room? Sure it's the law but in my experience people ditch that idea when there is no room and just buzz me. If I'm far right, they generally go slow by me because they know I am as far right as possible. If I'm two feet out on blind corners, they buzz me at a higher rate of speed and probably with a lot of anger. It makes no sense to me to be 1-2 feet out 99% of the time (when there are no parked cars). It's a lose-lose situation.
3 feet of room, yeah right. How many people even know this rule that doesn't bike?
I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that you're a former knuckle dragger?
To answer your question, it's a fucking road, not a bike path. And it's used for commerce, not just your recreation. I hope you're just playing devils advocate, but fear not.
And have any of the militant bike nazis been to Europe? In Italy, from my experience, they will mow you down.
Wait, who me?!
I'm all for sharing the road, but share is the key word.
Well at least I can't say you're self-centered. And my toddlers are a bunch better at sharing than people who get pissed at people out for a road ride.
I live close enough to work not to have to drive. Otherwise I wouldn't live here. Yep, I do have a car. Mostly to take me places to bike and ski.
This gets back to your earlier comment. Imagine you're biking on a road with no shoulder. maybe it's even a 4 lane road. So you as a cyclist take the right lane but it's spooky, you don't want to be there in a position you can get hit from behind. So the best thing you can do is take the lane, rather than hug the shoulder and encourage super sketchy passing along your left pinkie. Now there's a second bike. You both take up the lane, are far more visible, and at least you have company in the funeral home if you both get gunned down.
Less than 1/100th of a percent of my riding has been done like this, but my point is there is a place for it. Maybe even in the roundabout by your house. And since maybe as a driver "you" wouldn't know, the best thing you can do is de-rage and cut other people some slack (and I know YOU aren't buzzing cyclists or anything like that).
But this conversation keeps drifting into the notion that recreational cycling is selfish but it seems like many people, even here, are commuters and just trying to go about their lives. Same as the lady in the original video that was painted with a spandex brush. Not that there is anything wrong with people recreating, we should be able to make room for all purposes and people.
Except the crazy girl in the op vid reached into a car, committed assault, and larceny. All because of a horn honk.
Who knows what all happened but cooler heads should have prevailed.
Yeah, I'm totally fine... I'll give a toot so they know I'm there and pass them.
I drive slow as fuck on these roads... seriously. You should be so lucky as to have all drivers like me.
But on the highway, that's another story...
You must have missed my "cooler heads should have prevailed"
statement in my post.
Im no courtroom dentist but I remember enough from the bar of what constitutes assault and larceny. She committed both. You may not like it but that's why the police are looking for her.
If we have any NY courtroom jocks, maybe they could weigh in and tell us if being honked at very closely is an affirmative defense to these crimes.
1) what she did is, by law, a crime. Unless you don't believe in the law as it applies to others. In which case, good luck.
2) you lose. (Nothing personal man)
3) I don't own a video game on my phone so I can't act out your weird scenario even if I wanted to. Sorry.
4) if you still disagree just let me know where you'll be biking and I'll send DD's goons to follow you, take your water bottle or sunglasses and make a harmful or offensive contact with your face after you let out a loud noise. I'm told they're particularly rough.