I was hoping to get an idea of what people were thinking regarding the location of the 2008 TGR summit..
Printable View
I was hoping to get an idea of what people were thinking regarding the location of the 2008 TGR summit..
Let's hold it in Colorado! I hear the 2007 summit was a hudge success. ;)
If I recall Montana finished second in the voting last time, so if we follow recent tradition that would make 2008 the year to hit the Big Sky state.
There was a summit in 2007? I thought CO got stoned and postponed it until next year!
June... the perfect time to decide
CO mini represents every year. don't know why we need a summit when one happens every spring.
Mebbe these will evolve into a vast array of smaller cryptosummits.
well, the mini has always been a great time and people have showed up and done a better job organizing than the "big" summit. having the summit in CO was attempted last season and it wasn't the best turnout from what i hear. everyone gave it a chance, so maybe another location needs a chance.
Montana!
what about Idaho. that one up north, i think it's called Schweitzer. Montana is good, too. i probably won't go anyways.
The big summit never happened in Colorado because it happened all over Colorado. It was like a 10 day long thing that moved every other day... how retarded is that? No wonder nobody showed up or got it organized. Seriously I don't get why people are confused at the failure. It would have failed anywhere it was held if done in such a manner.
The 4th Annual CO-Mini went off hudge though with like fifty bazillion people (including non-CO ppl), drunkedness, fud, blastedness, stream skiing, and outright battle...
i completely agree with you, summit. when i saw that people were jumping from resort to resort with resting/bc days in between, that's when i decided i wasn't going. i haven nothing against having a summit in CO, anywhere, but the minis are always a good time whether it's the official "Summit" or not.
well except for interior BC and/or PNW->Wistler/Blackcomb where it worked well last year and 3 years ago repectively.....
noone in CO stepped up and tried, except a few Aspen peeps.
the CO mags just liked to bitch when noone picks their state and then bitch when people do.
see a theme?
I bet Montana would work well, even wirth multiple locations
interesting...the Colo Summit sounded a lot like this Epic gathering called Let's Go Colorado, which took place over something like 20 days at various resorts. I attended that for 3 days and had a blast. The days fluctuated, with 15 people at the first one I hit (at Beaver Creek), in excess of 50 at the next day (@ Vail) and then about 15 or so at Breck a few days later. I actually enjoyed the skipping to different resorts, days off, and the fluctuation in peoples.
that said, I also enjoyed the hell out of the Mammoth mini, which was basically the same crazy cadre riding and slushing and drinking for 3-4 days.
personally, as a jonged out newb here, i'll go anywhere with snow and good peoples.
^^ What Mr. Woodsy said.
There were multiple polls on the 2007 Summit, from where to hold it, when, at which areas, and in what general order.
The majority of votes were always cast by CO maggots. This was a Summit decided by the votes of CO maggots, but when the event actually happened, most of them were no shows.
As Woodsy said, a Summit that visits multiple locations in one geographic area has been successful in the past and can be again. Just obviously not in CO.
I like Montana or Wyoming. Good sled access skiing. I am down for a couple of sled access days wherever this summit thing ends up.
Bummed no one else committed. Remember, "You can't organize these things, they just happen." The Summit was only a failure to those who didn't want to sac up. Good peeps and great snow.
Regarding 2008 - I vote SA in the summer. Let the Minis do their job in the winter in the northern hemisphere and cool off the summer with a trip down south. Is a ticket to SA really that much more than to BC for most peeps?
we have done a UT summit, and there is a mini there yearly plus the step camps and the storm chasing ease puts a lot of us there often
UT summit is redundant in oh so many ways
Montucky, Taos, those sound like fun
Fyurk CO. I say Baker. Or Utah. Couldn't afford to make it to Whistler, I don't think, but I'd damn sure love to if finances allowed it (i.e. cheap flights/gas and cheap lift tickets).
Baker and Utah are on my hit list for this winter. I'd love to have one of those trips coincide with the Summit if it went down there. Woodsy says a UT summit is redundant, and I don't disagree, so Baker/Xtal/PNW would be my vote.
More or less. "I slacked this year, due in slight part to the lax attitude of those managing me. If I were made manager, I'd give more guidance to prevent such slacking." It made sense at the time, but as I anticipated, it didn't go well.
Rontele: Necessary to attack me for making an effort? Who the hell else volunteered to do it? Like I have said in the past about pear-shaped girl: "It wasn't a choice; it was a lack of options".