Scientists: Ozone hole size sets record

more wonderful news about how we have f-upped the environment


WASHINGTON - This year's Antarctic ozone hole is the biggest ever, government scientists said Thursday. The so-called hole is a region where there is severe depletion of the layer of ozone — a form of oxygen — in the upper atmosphere that protects life on Earth by blocking the sun's ultraviolet rays.

Scientists say human-produced gases such as bromine and chlorine damage the layer, causing the hole. That's why many compounds such as spray-can propellants have been banned in recent years.

"From Sept. 21 to 30, the average area of the ozone hole was the largest ever observed, at 10.6 million square miles," said Paul Newman, atmospheric scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md. That's larger than the area of North America.

In addition, satellite measurements observed a low reading of 85 Dobson units of ozone on Oct. 8. That's down from a thickness of 300 Dobson units in July.

The ozone hole is considered to be the area with total column ozone below 220 Dobson Units. A reading of 100 Dobson Units means that if all the ozone in the air above a point were brought down to sea-level pressure and cooled to freezing it would form a layer 1 centimeter thick. A reading of 250 Dobson Units translates to a layer about an inch thick.

In a critical layer of air between eight and 13 miles above the surface, the measurement was only 1.2 Dobson unit, down from 125 in July.

"These numbers mean the ozone is virtually gone in this layer of the atmosphere," said David Hofmann, director of the Global Monitoring Division at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Earth System Research Laboratory. "The depleted layer has an unusual vertical extent this year, so it appears that the 2006 ozone hole will go down as a record-setter."

The size and thickness of the ozone hole varies from year to year, becoming larger when temperatures are lower.

Because of international agreements banning ozone-depleting substances, researchers calculated that these chemicals peaked in Antarctica in 2001 and have been declining. However, many of them have extremely long lifetimes once released into the air.

While there are year-to-year variations, scientists expect a slow recovery of the ozone layer by the year 2065, anticipating declines in the use of damaging chemicals

Yes and no. Ozone is actually one area that we have done a pretty good job correcting past mistakes, thanks to the Montreal Protocol (1985ish, maybe?). Thanks to the drastic reduction in CFCs, further decreases in ozone appear to have stabilized. It will take several generations for the pre-Montreal problems to work themselves out, however. Until that time, annual ozone holes will continue to re-occur, but their size is determined by general climactic conditions, not human activity. I think the basic relationship is cold winters in Antarctica equals larger ozone hole.

So, that there is an ozone hole at all is because we have f'ed up the environment. But that this one was particularly large probably doesn't mean too much. Global warming probably has some direct and indirect impact on this, of course, but as Gore points out in Inconvenient Truth, the real story of the Ozone hole is one of optimism - we can reverse direction, we can fix these problems.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blurreds_left_nut

researchers calculated that these chemicals peaked in Antarctica in 2001 and have been declining. However, many of them have extremely long lifetimes once released into the air.

---

Quote:

---

scientists expect a slow recovery of the ozone layer by the year 2065, anticipating declines in the use of damaging chemicals

---

In all honesty this is good news. At least it's getting better, unlike the warming.