East coast skiing VS. West coast skiing
When I was 19 I left NJ for Colorado, and although I was an avid skier back east, the terrain and snow out here made me a much much better skier than I ever thought possible.
However, I wonder now if I missed something then, I didnt really explore the mountain in my teens the way I do now. I never hiked for my turns or ventured into the backcountry. I never experienced skiing deep snow in the east the way I have here.
The huge snows and terrain of Alta, the demanding terrain of A basin, the size and exposure of Jackson hole, the short and technical steeps of Squaw...all in the west.
Is there an east coast equivalent of the mountains above?
Did I miss something?
Or do all real skiers need to pack up and move West to challenge themselves?
Re: East coast skiing VS. West coast skiing
Quote:
Originally posted by Evil E
the terrain and snow out here made me a much much better skier than I ever thought possible....
Is there an east coast equivalent of the mountains above?
Did I miss something?
Or do all real skiers need to pack up and move West to challenge themselves?
No.
Yes.
Absolutely not. It's just a different challenge. And one that could, arguably, have made you just as good a skier as you are now. I think the east breeds some pretty serious rippers - the main difference being that they lack the forum to display their skills. The technicality and subtlety of Eastern lines do not make for grandiouse images or flashy decents. But the ability is there and so when they do make it out to the Western playground, they go apeshit.
Or something like that.
Sick and ashamed and happy (and it's silly to compare the terrain),
d.
Re: Re: East coast skiing VS. West coast skiing
Quote:
Originally posted by gincognito
The technicality and subtlety of Eastern lines do not make for grandiouse images or flashy decents. But the ability is there and so when they do make it out to the Western playground, they go apeshit.
.
d.
Exactly.