Printable View
I saw the post on the Buyer's Guide, but after scrolling through the first page of nerdy internet lingo, I gave up.
DID ANYONE NOTICE THE LACK OF A PHOTO GALLERY IN THE BUYER"S GUIDE?
It's the first time I've ever seen it in a ski mag, and as a subscriber I feel ripped off. The photos are the best part.
I don't see how any core ski company can support that sh*t
Who's in charge of deciding the cover photo? That is such a poser half/invert that anyone can do it. I'd be embarassed.
Thats why I get my subscription for free ;)
Freeskier is horrible. It occasionally has a few good photos, but the content is void of any meaning.
I dunno the women of freeskiing issue is always good
Quote:
Originally Posted by nealric
free = http://skitimemag.com/st/?s=subscribe
Ski Time should be interesting, considering it's published by the guys at Freeskier, but aimed for a younger demo. (ie: teenagers) It will probably be like Freeskier but with more park pictures and fart jokes, but there is always hope.Quote:
Originally Posted by Truckee Joe
Give up hope now...there is none with these jokers.Quote:
Originally Posted by sftc
Ski Time is being published and financed by Freeskier but put together and written by the ex Newschoolers.com staff Matt Harvey and Ethan Stone.
"Gimme some of your tots, Harvey!" That kid cracks me up. Good dude.Quote:
Originally Posted by Skier10322
http://www.powdermag.com/av/index1.html
(click on Level 1).
Freeskier does suck. Freeze was a way better jib mag. I met Brad Fayfield at the TGR premier last year, and he is a total Ken Doll. It is a weak mag put out by trusty's from Boulder. It should be called "Paying for Skiing at Breck With My Dad's Credit Card Magazine."