Float - Surface area matters, right?
I have a dilemma. Hopefully someone can help. I'm looking at some fatties. 120 underfoot and about 188 length. Early rise tip and tail...you know, the regular new stuff. Seems simple enough, right? The issue I have is this. I'm 6'2". With this much surface area, do I really need 5 or 6 more centimeters? Would it make a difference? I mean, if the longer ski were slightly more narrow in the waist and tip, wouldn't it be a wash (without doing the math)?
Man, I hate transition times in skiing. There's no consensus. No sanity. Ahhhhhhhh!!!!!!!
:rolleyes: