2004/2005 Ski Area Environmental Grades
Just got this in my email this morning. Kirkwood crew - time to let Kirkwood know they can do better! Glad to see Alpine doing well.
***************
Ski Area Citizens’ Coalition Releases
2004/2005 Ski Area Environmental Grades
www.skiareacitizens.com
Independent Study Validates Scorecard Methods
(Durango, CO)- Today, the Ski Area Citizens’ Coalition (SACC) released annual Ski Area Environmental Scorecard grades for 77 ski resorts throughout the western United States. Based on a comprehensive set of 24 criteria, the Scorecard unearths the environmental friendliness of each resort with both a numerical (0-100) and letter (A, B, C, D, or F) grade. This year, the top ten best and worst resorts include:*
The Top Ten Most Environmentally Friendly Ski Resorts
Ski Resort
State
Grade
Aspen Mountain Ski Resort
Colorado
A
Buttermilk Ski Resort
Colorado
A
Aspen Highlands
Colorado
A
Alpine Meadows
California
A
Sundance Resort
Utah
A
Mount Bachelor
Oregon
A
Wolf Creek Ski Area
Colorado
A
Sierra at Tahoe
California
A
Timberline Ski Area
Oregon
A
Winter Park Ski Area
Colorado
B
The Top Ten Least Environmentally Friendly Ski Resorts
Ski Resort
State
Grade
Crested Butte Mountain Resort
Colorado
F
Breckenridge Ski Resort
Colorado
F
Copper Mountain Ski Resort
Colorado
F
Crystal Mountain Resort
Washington
F
Vail Ski Resort
Colorado
F
Silver Mountain Ski Resort
Idaho
F
Brianhead Ski Area
Utah
D
Keystone Ski Resort
Colorado
D
Kirkwood Ski Resort
California
D
Grand Targhee Ski & Summer Resort
Wyoming
D
*<>Grades for eight resorts in Utah will be published in November.
<>This year’s Scorecard gives greater weight to voluntary measures such as use of wind power, biodiesel and water conservation. The Scorecard now also incorporates a progressive grading system by which environmentally damaging projects are discounted over five years, rather than a single five year cut-off. For example, if a ski area is currently proposing or actively logging old growth forest for ski runs, its score is fully discounted, while its score is discounted by 40% if it undertook the same project three years ago.
<>“Unfortunately, raw scores failed to improve by much despite giving more weight to positive environmental initiatives such as conserving water and using wind power,” stated Jeff Berman, Executive Director of Colorado Wild. “This years’ grades support independent researchers’ recent conclusion that the ski industry’s Sustainable Slopes program is unfortunately more about safeguarding the industry’s image than safeguarding the environment.”
An independent study released this August affirmed the SACC’s methodology for the Scorecard. Professors Jorge Rivera (George Washington University) and Peter de Leon (University of Denver) published a study in a peer reviewed journal analyzing ski industry environmental impacts and the National Ski Area Association’s Sustainable Slopes program. Entitled “Is Greener Whiter? Voluntary Environmental Performance of Western Ski Areas (Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2004)”, the study concluded that in the case of industry’s voluntary Sustainable Slopes program, “participant ski areas appear to be correlated with lower third-party environmental performance ratings.” The researchers concluded that the ski industry’s Sustainable Slopes program lacks third-party oversight, does not have sanctions for poor performance, and does not involve specific environmental standards.
Published annually by the Ski Area Citizens’ Coalition, the Ski Area Environmental Scorecard provides skiers with the information they need to genuinely choose environmentally friendly ski destinations throughout the West.
“We hope skiers and boarders will utilize this information when choosing where to buy their season pass or when making ski trip plans this winter,” said Joan Clayburgh, Executive Director of the Sierra Nevada Alliance. “But even when you ski at a resort that has an average or poor grade, it makes a difference to mention to the resort that you hope they improve their environmental performance. Ski resorts listen to their customers.”
Skiers can also easily send emails to resorts through the website: www.skiareacitizens.com, encouraging environmentally friendly results and asking others to improve their environmental policies and management. Detailed descriptions of the criteria used to grade resorts and a complete breakdown of each ski area’s score can be found on-line.
The Scorecard data is obtained from public records from government agencies and from the resorts themselves. Freedom of Information Act and Public Records Act requests are filed with appropriate land managers to identify ski area development projects and management plans each spring. Resorts are also provided surveys and letters to collect information regarding their on-mountain environmental programs. All source documents can be viewed on the website.
The Coalition’s steering committee includes non-profit conservation organizations Colorado Wild, the Crystal Conservation Coalition (WA), Lands Council (WA), Environmental Resource Center (ID), Friends of the Inyo (CA), and the Sierra Nevada Alliance (CA). Over three dozen other conservation organizations also endorse the Scorecard.<>