not choosing sides, I think they both suck
sorry if this was posted already:
http://www.empirikal.net/misc/yay/bushnotes.jpg
Printable View
not choosing sides, I think they both suck
sorry if this was posted already:
http://www.empirikal.net/misc/yay/bushnotes.jpg
:D :D :D I guess nothing is secret anymore, damn that al kida dude anyway, and them sniveling liberal sob's. ;)
ugh, here comes blurred :rolleyes:
Yep, take sound bites out of context and you can pretty much prove anything. Bush was anything BUT presidential in the debate. He did say the same thing over and over for 90 minutes. At least he is consistant.
like "we went about it the right wrong way" :DQuote:
Originally Posted by bdog
Check out this guy's GUT - doest's St. Louis have lots of White Castles?
http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2004/ALLPOLIT...e.eagle.ap.jpg
http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/04/10/ca...bush_wired.jpg
Oct. 8, 2004 | Was President Bush literally channeling Karl Rove in his first debate with John Kerry? That's the latest rumor flooding the Internet, unleashed last week in the wake of an image caught by a television camera during the Miami debate. The image shows a large solid object between Bush's shoulder blades as he leans over the lectern and faces moderator Jim Lehrer.
The president is not known to wear a back brace, and it's safe to say he wasn't packing. So was the bulge under his well-tailored jacket a hidden receiver, picking up transmissions from someone offstage feeding the president answers through a hidden earpiece? Did the device explain why the normally ramrod-straight president seemed hunched over during much of the debate?
Bloggers are burning up their keyboards with speculation. Check out the president's peculiar behavior during the debate, they say. On several occasions, the president simply stopped speaking for an uncomfortably long time and stared ahead with an odd expression on his face. Was he listening to someone helping him with his response to a question? Even weirder was the president's strange outburst. In a peeved rejoinder to Kerry, he said, "As the politics change, his positions change. And that's not how a commander in chief acts. I, I, uh -- Let me finish -- The intelligence I looked at was the same intelligence my opponent looked at." It must be said that Bush pointed toward Lehrer as he declared "Let me finish." The green warning light was lit, signaling he had 30 seconds to, well, finish.
Hot on the conspiracy trail, I tried to track down the source of the photo. None of the Bush-is-wired bloggers, however, seemed to know where the photo came from. Was it possible the bulge had been Photoshopped onto Bush's back by a lone conspiracy buff? It turns out that all of the video of the debate was recorded and sent out by Fox News, the pool broadcaster for the event. Fox sent feeds from multiple cameras to the other networks, which did their own on-air presentations and editing.
To watch the debate again, I ventured to the Web site of the most sober network I could think of: C-SPAN. And sure enough, at minute 23 on the video of the debate, you can clearly see the bulge between the president's shoulder blades.
Bloggers stoke the conspiracy with the claim that the Bush administration insisted on a condition that no cameras be placed behind the candidates. An official for the Commission on Presidential Debates, which set up the lecterns and microphones on the Miami stage, said the condition was indeed real, the result of negotiations by both campaigns. Yet that didn't stop Fox from setting up cameras behind Bush and Kerry. The official said that "microphones were mounted on lecterns, and the commission put no electronic devices on the president or Senator Kerry." When asked about the bulge on Bush's back, the official said, "I don't know what that was."
So what was it? Jacob McKenna, a spyware expert and the owner of the Spy Store, a high-tech surveillance shop in Spokane, Wash., looked at the Bush image on his computer monitor. "There's certainly something on his back, and it appears to be electronic," he said. McKenna said that, given its shape, the bulge could be the inductor portion of a two-way push-to-talk system. McKenna noted that such a system makes use of a tiny microchip-based earplug radio that is pushed way down into the ear canal, where it is virtually invisible. He also said a weak signal could be scrambled and be undetected by another broadcaster.
Mystery-bulge bloggers argue that the president may have begun using such technology earlier in his term. Because Bush is famously prone to malapropisms and reportedly dyslexic, which could make successful use of a teleprompter problematic, they say the president and his handlers may have turned to a technique often used by television reporters on remote stand-ups. A reporter tapes a story and, while on camera, plays it back into an earpiece, repeating lines just after hearing them, managing to sound spontaneous and error free.
Suggestions that Bush may have using this technique stem from a D-day event in France, when a CNN broadcast appeared to pick up -- and broadcast to surprised viewers -- the sound of another voice seemingly reading Bush his lines, after which Bush repeated them. Danny Schechter, who operates the news site MediaChannel.org, and who has been doing some investigating into the wired-Bush rumors himself, said the Bush campaign has been worried of late about others picking up their radio frequencies -- notably during the Republican Convention on the day of Bush's appearance. "They had a frequency specialist stop me and ask about the frequency of my camera," Schechter said. "The Democrats weren't doing that at their convention."
As for whether we really do have a Milli Vanilli president, the answer at this point has to be, God only knows.
Tap -
I actually remember noticing that last week - what's your source on that story?
The notes are hilarious, and the last article is pretty funny too. As I've said before, his staff must be AMAZING!!! How do they get all of his speeches into a pop-up format that bush can read?
picked it up on Ridemonkey.com, but do a search on the internet, you'll find some bloggersQuote:
Originally Posted by Lane Meyer
I thought it was a bullet-proof vest.
Somehow makes more sense.
www.isbushwired.com
HMMMMMMMmmmmmmm..... I'll be watching the cutaways a little closer tonight. If it's true then he can kiss his figurative ass goodbye.
can he literaly kiss his figurative ass goodbye?
i like to see that.
i also love consipracy. yea conspiricy!
This (Washington Monthly from 10/4) has an interesting quote int he comments towards the bottom of the page:
Quote:
I think the lump is either a bulletproof vest or some kind of larval parasitic cacodemon growing in a cyst on his back.
Virtually actuable, hypothetically plausible, yet cognitively supercilious.Quote:
Originally Posted by basom