what are the benefits of having the elastic travel heel on the Free over the solid heel on the WC MFX bindings? why should i go with one over the other? i have a choice of either type of binding with the same din range.
Printable View
what are the benefits of having the elastic travel heel on the Free over the solid heel on the WC MFX bindings? why should i go with one over the other? i have a choice of either type of binding with the same din range.
If the blurbs I've read are correct, the WC Rossi bindings actually have more elastic travel than the turntables (I assume that's the binding you're asking about).Quote:
Originally Posted by voiron
this would apply to the current axial 2 bindings. both the 150 and 200 in Free and WC MFX.
Open wide for a spoonfeeding
Summary: no functional (release) differences that I can see.
my question is about elastic travel on the heel. the WC bindings do not have this. my question is not about DIN!
Everything I've read says that the WC MXF and the XL/XXL bindings are functionally the same...only difference is cosmetics. I.e., it is like the past difference between the "race" paint schemes and the freeride paint schemes on the FKS bindings.Quote:
Originally Posted by voiron