tripods are neat

Printable View

11-08-2007, 12:32 PM
grapedrink

tripods are neat

just got one a few days ago and have been dickin' around with it. these are my first attempts at long exposures so be nice, its all new to me. do the exposures and white balance look ok?

http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/3485/65266399mm3.jpg

http://img87.imageshack.us/img87/8070/70104180va3.jpg

http://img260.imageshack.us/img260/9977/21009310nl1.jpg

http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/9316/50655613he1.jpg

http://img249.imageshack.us/img249/9536/60452908gf8.jpg

http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/7800/18878251kb5.jpg
11-08-2007, 12:52 PM
MOHSHSIHd

Looks good to me!
11-08-2007, 01:55 PM
Tippster

1st two are hard to tell they're on tripods (too much light for the stars to "pop") but the rest are $$$$$$$$
11-08-2007, 03:22 PM
grizzle6

Nice stuff for your first night outings. Try shooting the cityscapes around 20 min. or so after the sun goes down. That way you'll get a nice indigo sky and the city lights will just be starting to pop. Word.
11-08-2007, 03:59 PM
Conundrum

Those are pretty cool. I just got a remote shutter release and you've inspired my night.

Since we're on the topic, what kind of tripod did you use? I've got a really cheap, light one and am thinking about upgrading.
11-08-2007, 07:11 PM
Natedogg

Great pics, Grape.

Pro opinions on using mirror lockup for long exposures or even landscapes?
11-08-2007, 08:29 PM
dipstik

Cool stuff. For more tripod fun, google "painting with light".
11-08-2007, 08:52 PM
advres

How long was the shutter open for most of those?
11-08-2007, 08:58 PM
Junker

Quote:

Originally Posted by Natedogg

Great pics, Grape.

Pro opinions on using mirror lockup for long exposures or even landscapes?

I am no pro, but here are my thoughts. Mirror lockup is good for long exposures with in reason-like 1/15, 1 sec, 10 sec, 30 sec etc. There is a point where your shutter speeds become so long (and as a result, very little light is striking the sensor i.e. F/22, or it's sensitivity is very low i.e. ISO 100) that a slight shake changing the placement of light on the sensor has no noticable effect- for exposures >2 minutes doesn't seem to matter. THough it's probably a good habit to form by using it.
11-08-2007, 10:34 PM
grizzle6

Quote:

Originally Posted by Natedogg

Great pics, Grape.

Pro opinions on using mirror lockup for long exposures or even landscapes?

I say always afford yourself the absolute best opportunity to capture the sharpest shot possible. Whenever possible (and I usually can always make it possible somehow), I use a tripod with a cable release and mirror lockup. Just form good habits--can't really ever hurt. My .02
11-08-2007, 10:37 PM
MeatPuppet

Quote:

Originally Posted by Junker

I am no pro, but here are my thoughts. Mirror lockup is good for long exposures with in reason-like 1/15, 1 sec, 10 sec, 30 sec etc. There is a point where your shutter speeds become so long (and as a result, very little light is striking the sensor i.e. F/22, or it's sensitivity is very low i.e. ISO 100) that a slight shake changing the placement of light on the sensor has no noticable effect- for exposures >2 minutes doesn't seem to matter. THough it's probably a good habit to form by using it.

Me=non pro, but my experience would agree with what Junker said. Also, the wider the angle you are shooting at, the less critical MLU becomes.
11-09-2007, 07:09 AM
grapedrink

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tippster

1st two are hard to tell they're on tripods (too much light for the stars to "pop") but the rest are $$$$$$$$

thanks, the first two were shot in total darkness, i couldn't even autofocus anywhere.. the stars are dim because i'm in the middle of the city.. they weren't actually visible at the time.
11-09-2007, 07:10 AM
grapedrink

Quote:

Originally Posted by grizzle6

Nice stuff for your first night outings. Try shooting the cityscapes around 20 min. or so after the sun goes down. That way you'll get a nice indigo sky and the city lights will just be starting to pop. Word.

yeah i know, for the first one i was actually trying to get that but got stuck in traffic, by the time i got setup it was too late. the window was maybe 10-15 minutes tops.. i guess i should have just shot it quickly, the two panos are actually pretty big, about 30 pictures stitched together.
11-09-2007, 07:27 AM
grapedrink

Quote:

Originally Posted by Natedogg

Great pics, Grape.

Pro opinions on using mirror lockup for long exposures or even landscapes?

well for what its worth i use MLU on all my tripod shots (as well as IS off), it makes a difference, take two and compare. you don't need a remote cable release, you can just put your camera on timer. i used a cable release on the panoramas though just because it was more convenient than reaching for the cameras button over and over, and they're necessary for bulb exposures unless you want to hold the shutter button down for 30+ seconds yourself. i got a cheapo one on ebay, $10-15, works great.
11-09-2007, 07:53 AM
Natedogg

Quote:

Originally Posted by grizzle6

Whenever possible (and I usually can always make it possible somehow), I use a tripod with a cable release and mirror lockup. Just form good habits--can't really ever hurt. My .02

Cool, thanks--that's what I figured. I wasn't sure if lockup was some obscure thing that most people don't use because it doesn't make a huge difference, or if it's a legit method that should be used whenever possible.

Quote:

Originally Posted by grapedrink

well for what its worth i use MLU on all my tripod shots

Good to know... I have yet to take two to compare, but I will. Another convience with a remote shutter release is that you don't have to wait 10 seconds for every shot you take. It adds up, especially at dawn or dusk when good light is gone in no time.
11-09-2007, 08:16 AM
grapedrink

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conundrum

Those are pretty cool. I just got a remote shutter release and you've inspired my night.

Since we're on the topic, what kind of tripod did you use? I've got a really cheap, light one and am thinking about upgrading.

i used a bogen/manfrotto 3021bpro with 488rc2 ballhead. the legs are bulky but i wanted something tall and sturdy, if you have small lenses you could definitely get away with something a lot smaller. the ballhead sucks but if you don't use your tripod much or have lots of time to fiddle with framing when you do then its probably not worth spending anymore money than that. heres my thread at w&w..

http://www.wheelsandwax.com/forums/v...t=1710&start=0