WHICH LINE RIPPED YOU THIS YEAR?
yes it's that time of year again fellow maggots/rippers/jibsters/park monkeys/powhounds/etc.
which line challengd you the most and ripped you apart this year? in other words which line is gonna make you come back next year and wanna take it clean and rip the heck outta it?
for me: a narrow tight shot in the woods with a mandatory icefall huck of about 10' through a tight set of trees on both sides to a steep steep Straightline. killed me, couldn't master that sucka for all its worth.
lets here em fools!
Re: WHICH LINE RIPPED YOU THIS YEAR?
Since you didn't specify, i have 3 lines that i got owned on last season that i would like to conquer, all bike related :D
1. 5th horseman on cypress . just when i thought the shore was getting easier, :eek: rock faces are easy when they are smooth and fairly not steep. this just wasn't fair
2. platinum. rode around pretty much everything. 20ft gappers aren't my bag of tea, yet.
3. lesbians only to wifebeater. 4 inch skinnies for a couple hundered feet, to 8 inch log with 90 degree corner to 12ft drop. followed by gappers, to gappers to corners, to more gappers, to the 911 drop :eek:
skiing wise i have been consistently owned by the baby table in the park this season :D waaaay too depressing
Re: Re: WHICH LINE RIPPED YOU THIS YEAR?
Quote:
Originally posted by White Chocolate
3. lesbians only to wifebeater. 4 inch skinnies for a couple hundered feet, to 8 inch log with 90 degree corner to 12ft drop. followed by gappers, to gappers to corners, to more gappers, to the 911 drop
i'm gonna go huddle in a corner and suck my thumb now.
Re: WHICH LINE RIPPED YOU THIS YEAR?
Quote:
Originally posted by HRDCORESNOWRIDE
yes it's that time of year again fellow maggots/rippers/jibsters/park monkeys/powhounds/etc.
.... challengd you the most and ripped you apart this year?
I rip some pretty good farts every now and then. This winter however, just didn't have the pressure or the mechanics down for a good ripper.
Re: Re: WHICH LINE RIPPED YOU THIS YEAR?
Quote:
Originally posted by iskibc
I rip some pretty good farts every now and then. This winter however, just didn't have the pressure or the mechanics down for a good ripper.
Maybe this explains the swamp ass??
edit: and roo got rippped by Line.
+3 points for incorporating 2 old threads into a reply to another old thread.
never had a smiley in a link before
I actually liked the 9/11 commission report. Specifically the following.
Paragraph #347 (on page 66)
In mid-1998, the situation reversed; it was Iraq that reportedly took the ini tiative. In March 1998, after Bin Ladin’s public fatwa against the United States, two al Qaeda members reportedly went to Iraq to meet with Iraqi intelligence. In July, an Iraqi delegation traveled to Afghanistan to meet first with the Taliban and then with Bin Ladin. Sources reported that one, or perhaps both, of these meetings was apparently arranged through Bin Ladin’s Egyptian deputy, Zawahiri, who had ties of his own to the Iraqis. In 1998, Iraq was under intensifying U.S. pressure, which culminated in a series of large air attacks in December.
[ show in clusters ]
Paragraph #348 (on page 66)
Similar meetings between Iraqi officials and Bin Ladin or his aides may have occurred in 1999 during a period of some reported strains with the Taliban. According to the reporting, Iraqi officials offered Bin Ladin a safe haven in Iraq. Bin Ladin declined, apparently judging that his circumstances in Afghanistan remained more favorable than the Iraqi alternative. The reports describe friendly contacts and indicate some common themes in both sides’ hatred of the United States. But to date we have seen no evidence that these or the earlier contacts ever developed into a collaborative operational relationship. Nor have we seen evidence indicating that Iraq cooperated with al Qaeda in developing or carrying out any attacks against the United States.
[ show in clusters ]
Paragraph #284 (on page 51)
Bin Ladin shares Qutb’s stark view, permitting him and his followers to rationalize even unprovoked mass murder as righteous defense of an embattled faith. Many Americans have wondered,“Why do ‘they’ hate us?” Some also ask, “What can we do to stop these attacks?” Bin Ladin and al Qaeda have given answers to both these questions.To the first, they say that America had attacked Islam; America is responsible for all conflicts involving Muslims. Thus Americans are blamed when Israelis fight with Palestinians, when Russians fight with Chechens, when Indians fight with Kashmiri Muslims, and when the Philippine government fights ethnic Muslims in its southern islands.America is also held responsible for the governments of Muslim countries, derided by al Qaeda as “your agents.” Bin Ladin has stated flatly,“Our fight against these governments is not separate from our fight against you.”14 These charges found a ready audience among millions of Arabs and Muslims angry at the United States because of issues ranging from Iraq to Palestine to America’s support for their countries’ repressive rulers.
[ show in clusters ]
Paragraph #615 (on page 128)
Though intelligence gave no clear indication of what might be afoot, some intelligence reports mentioned chemical weapons, pointing toward work at a camp in southern Afghanistan called Derunta. On November 4, 1998, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York unsealed its indictment of Bin Ladin, charging him with conspiracy to attack U.S. defense installations.The indictment also charged that al Qaeda had allied itself with Sudan, Iran, and Hezbollah.The original sealed indictment had added that al Qaeda had “reached an understanding with the government of Iraq that al Qaeda would not work against that government and that on particular projects, specifically including weapons development, al Qaeda would work cooperatively with the Government of Iraq.”109 This passage led Clarke, who for years had read intelligence reports on Iraqi-Sudanese cooperation on chemical weapons, to speculate to Berger that a large Iraqi presence at chemical facilities in Khartoum was “probably a direct result of the Iraq–Al Qida agreement.” Clarke added that VX precursor traces found near al Shifa were the “exact formula used by Iraq.”110 This language about al Qaeda’s “understanding” with Iraq had been dropped, however, when a superseding indictment was filed in November 1998.
[ show in clusters ]
Paragraph #314 (on page 57)
Bin Ladin moved to Sudan in 1991 and set up a large and complex set of intertwined business and terrorist enterprises. In time, the former would encompass numerous companies and a global network of bank accounts and nongovernmental institutions. Fulfilling his bargain with Turabi, Bin Ladin used his construction company to build a new highway from Khartoum to Port Sudan on the Red Sea coast. Meanwhile, al Qaeda finance officers and top operatives used their positions in Bin Ladin’s businesses to acquire weapons, explosives, and technical equipment for terrorist purposes. One founding member, Abu Hajer al Iraqi, used his position as head of a Bin Ladin investment company to carry out procurement trips from western Europe to the Far East.Two others,Wadi al Hage and Mubarak Douri, who had become acquainted in Tuc son,Arizona, in the late 1980s, went as far afield as China, Malaysia, the Philippines, and the former Soviet states of Ukraine and Belarus.
[ show in clusters ]
Re: never had a smiley in a link before
Quote:
Originally posted by mr_gyptian
But to date we have seen no evidence that these or the earlier contacts ever developed into a collaborative operational relationship. Nor have we seen evidence indicating that Iraq cooperated with al Qaeda in developing or carrying out any attacks against the United States.
So why did we invade Iraq again?