Teton Gravity Research Forums Statistics

Collapse

Topics: 305,608   Posts: 6,864,183   Members: 413,486   Active Members: 12,218
Welcome to our newest member, WilliamBarrows.

3 dead in Washington Cascades

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rock Knocker
    Registered User
    • Oct 2017
    • 190

    #1

    3 dead in Washington Cascades

    Reports are preliminary at this point

    The Northwest Avalanche Center exists to increase avalanche awareness, reduce avalanche impacts, and equip the community with mountain weather and avalanche forecasts, education, and data.
    Attached Files
  • chaka
    Registered User
    • Feb 2005
    • 2747

    #2
    AP Article

    Avalanche in Washington's Cascade Mountains kills 3
    Heavy snowfall and winds are keeping searchers from reaching a remote peak in Washington's Cascade Mountains, where an avalanche killed three people

    SEATTLE -- Heavy snowfall and high winds on Tuesday kept searchers away from a remote, jagged peak in Washington’s Cascade Mountains, where an avalanche killed three climbers from the northeastern U.S. over the weekend.

    The slide struck Sunday as a group of six climbers were ascending a steep, snow-packed gulley on the 8,705-foot (2,653 meters) Colchuck Peak, about 70 miles (113 kilometers) east of Seattle in the Alpine Lakes Wilderness, Chelan County sheriff's Sgt. Jason Reinfeld said Tuesday.

    Four of the climbers were swept about 500 feet (152 meters) down the slope. One of the four survived, a 56-year-old man from New York, and despite some injuries he was able to confirm that the other three were killed before working his way back to their base camp at Colchuck Lake, Reinfeld said.

    The two members of the climbing party who were not swept away did not immediately descend to base camp, but remained about two-thirds of the way up the gulley — called a couloir — and saw three additional avalanches come down, burying two of the deceased climbers.

    A seventh member of the group, one who remained at base camp rather than participate in Sunday's climb, hiked out to get help — an arduous overnight journey that included a descent of about 4,000 vertical feet (1,219 meters) over 8 miles (12.9 kilometers). He was able to contact the sheriff's office by 8 a.m. Monday to relay what had happened, Reinfeld said.

    A mountain rescue team reached the base camp early that afternoon but decided against venturing above the lake due to the avalanche risk.

    The searchers returned with the surviving climbers on Monday and declined to even attempt to reach the area on Tuesday amid a heavy snowstorm and wind gusts of up to 60 mph (96.6 kmh).

    Members of the Northwest Avalanche Center and mountain rescue crews planned to head back on Wednesday to assess the hazards at the scene, Reinfeld said.

    Those killed were identified as a 53-year-old man from Connecticut, a 60-year-old woman from New York and a 66-year-old man from New Jersey. Reinfeld said the group had some mountaineering experience, but he did not know the extent of it.

    The avalanche was the the deadliest in the U.S. since four backcountry skiers were killed in an avalanche in Utah two years ago.

    Comment

    • yeahman
      Unregistered User
      • Dec 2010
      • 8325

      #3
      Lots of unanswered questions here, like who were these people and what were they doing there. RIP

      Comment

      • the_prof
        Registered User
        • Dec 2019
        • 43

        #4
        Really sad to hear. I was up in the same zone-ish (Rock Mtn) on Sat/Sun- lot of fat wind slabs forming up from the storm moving in. The greater than expected precip + high wind on Saturday night helped exacerbate the problem.

        Comment

        • raisingarizona13
          Registered User
          • Dec 2009
          • 5403

          #5
          Originally posted by yeahman
          Lots of unanswered questions here, like who were these people and what were they doing there. RIP
          They were 60 something year olds from Jersey. What could possibly go wrong?

          I'm going to go out on a limb and say that a "trip of a lifetime" may have had something to do with their decision making on this one. Sort of like weekend warriors that decide to go into unfavorable conditions on Mount Washington in New Hampshire because it's the weekend damnit and they've been wanting to do this for years.
          dirtbag, not a dentist

          Comment

          • Patarero
            Registered User
            • Apr 2010
            • 855

            #6
            Originally posted by the_prof
            Really sad to hear. I was up in the same zone-ish (Rock Mtn) on Sat/Sun- lot of fat wind slabs forming up from the storm moving in. The greater than expected precip + high wind on Saturday night helped exacerbate the problem.
            Telemetry supports that. It also looks like they might have gotten sucked into a sucker hole in the weather. High winds early Sunday that dropped to nothing. The Observations from an area north of there on Friday showed several weak layers on top of the potential persistent weak layer problem that seems to be very Spanish Inquisition like in this zone. Avy forecast was yellow for Above Tree Line. I had been planning to go into an area north of there, but went mt biking instead based on the conditions report from the 18th.

            Likely some human factor issues that went against the "climb the conditions not the calendar" mantra.

            Comment

            • BFD
              Registered User
              • Apr 2004
              • 3836

              #7
              The avalanche appears to be the deadliest in the U.S. since the 2020-21 season, when four people were killed in Utah.

              from a New York climbing club. vibes to the family and friends.
              off your knees Louie

              Comment

              • oftpiste
                piste to the gills
                • Nov 2006
                • 8467

                #8
                Think I heard one report that said they had no safety gear. So sad.
                Originally posted by Foggy_Goggles
                If I lived in WA, Oft would be my realtor. Seriously.

                Comment

                • goldenboy
                  Jack's got my back
                  • Jan 2005
                  • 5359

                  #9
                  Originally posted by oftpiste
                  Think I heard one report that said they had no safety gear. So sad.
                  Dang. I just finished the most recent edition of "The Snowy Torrents" from '86 to '96 and it's amazing how often no one had safety gear back then. Seems very uncommon now.

                  It didn't sound like anyone had an inreach or anything similar, either. That seemed odd to me with such a large group.

                  Sent from my SM-G996U1 using Tapatalk
                  14erskiers.com
                  Crested Butte Real Estate
                  Backountry Ski and Snowboard Routes: Colorado guidebook
                  Crested Butte Podcast

                  Comment

                  • powdork
                    Old Man and the Ski
                    • Apr 2007
                    • 16339

                    #10
                    Originally posted by goldenboy
                    Dang. I just finished the most recent edition of "The Snowy Torrents" from '86 to '96 and it's amazing how often no one had safety gear back then. Seems very uncommon now.

                    It didn't sound like anyone had an inreach or anything similar, either. That seemed odd to me with such a large group.

                    Sent from my SM-G996U1 using Tapatalk
                    50/50 chance there could have been one on one of the deceased
                    powdork.com - new and improved, with 20% more dork.

                    Comment

                    • rod9301
                      Rod9301
                      • Jan 2009
                      • 4982

                      #11
                      Originally posted by oftpiste
                      Think I heard one report that said they had no safety gear. So sad.
                      Not clear how the safety gear would have helped. I assume you mean beacon, probe, shovel.
                      More important than safety gear, imo, is knowing the snow conditions beforehand and verifying with snow pits. Even though when you climb a couloir, and it releases above you, even snow pits are not very useful.

                      Sent from my moto g 5G using Tapatalk

                      Comment

                      • Cisco Kid
                        Registered User
                        • Sep 2010
                        • 2827

                        #12
                        IMO, not wearing a beacon even when going solo is selfish and shortsighted. I imagine the loss that loved ones will feel is prolonged waiting for the body to melt out in the spring.
                        Seeker of Truth. Dispenser of Wisdom. Protector of the Weak. Avenger of Evil.

                        Comment

                        • GoldMember
                          Registered User
                          • Apr 2006
                          • 6898

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Patarero
                          Telemetry supports that. It also looks like they might have gotten sucked into a sucker hole in the weather. High winds early Sunday that dropped to nothing. The Observations from an area north of there on Friday showed several weak layers on top of the potential persistent weak layer problem that seems to be very Spanish Inquisition like in this zone. Avy forecast was yellow for Above Tree Line. I had been planning to go into an area north of there, but went mt biking instead based on the conditions report from the 18th.

                          Likely some human factor issues that went against the "climb the conditions not the calendar" mantra.
                          Article I read said the danger scale was high alpine, considerable at treeline, moderate lower. I'm not clear on what may have driven them to be in a coulier with those conditions but having traveled across the country to be there, they were probably very determined to do it and probably ignorant to proper assessment. Regardless, RIP to them.

                          Comment

                          • HappyCamper
                            Registered User
                            • Aug 2015
                            • 295

                            #14
                            More detail - https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle...-in-avalanche/

                            Comment

                            • sheel44
                              Registered User
                              • Sep 2018
                              • 91

                              #15
                              It was high the day after, but that day it was moderate moderate low, with "increasing danger" in the forecast. Nearby stevens was considerable. Still, as others said, not the day for it given snowpack structure

                              Comment

                              Working...