Atomic Backland XTD 120 - new for 2023 - 24 season

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LeeLau
    Registered User
    • Feb 2005
    • 14443

    #1

    Atomic Backland XTD 120 - new for 2023 - 24 season

    Just to make this easier to search and because the forum search function is somewhat (to put it mildly broken here's detailed pics, descriptions and brain dumps about the new Atomic Backland XTD 120.

    ONK (Matt) has some details plus q&a about this in the dedicated Atomic boot thread but that's got a lot of other boots in there (Hawx, Redster etc). Because the Backland XTD is new and there's not much info about it this is an effort to make it searchable and easier to find info and review

    I've had less than 8 days on them so far so can't really contribute much more than generalities some of which I've put in 1300g boot thread also but will keep adding stuff here as I'm sure others will.

    Here goes
    ONK's notes

    • Imagine a Hawx Prime with 74° of better-than-Backland cuff ROM, a 120 flex and a full rubber touring norm sole (or GripWalk if you want).
    • 1390g / 26.5
    • 100mm, medium volume last (based on Hawx Prime)
    • Same cuff height (front & rear) as Hawx Prime
    • New lower shell construction blends an overlap & open-throat construction together for the best of easy on/off and foot wrapping
    • Frictionless “Mirror” Pivots deliver a more free-gliding cuff than Backland (they are symmetrical & parallel in their orientation)
    • New ski/walk mechanism allows for 3 forward lean settings (no flip chips) 13°-15°-17°
    • Available as a touring norm ISO 9523 boot or as GripWalk (it’s not swappable, just made either way)

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Backland XTD.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	113.6 KB
ID:	10689454

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20230224_125500.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	119.7 KB
ID:	10689455

    Backland XTD 120 vs "original" Backland Carbon (remains unchanged).

    Backland XTD is heavier (1451g in size 27.5 vs 1146g) but stiffer than the Backland carbon (admittedly subjective 120 vs optimistic 110 flex)

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20230224_155053.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	100.8 KB
ID:	10689456
    Tecnica ZeroG Tour Pro 130 (my personal dedicated touring boot) vs Backland XTD. The Backland shell and liner are slightly taller. The Tecnica ZGTP weighs 1326g; Backland XTD 27.5 weighs 1451g. The 26.5 weighs 1382g
    Last edited by LeeLau; 03-30-2023, 09:07 PM.
  • LeeLau
    Registered User
    • Feb 2005
    • 14443

    #2
    More

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20230224_155915.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	91.4 KB
ID:	10522629

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20230224_155813.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	116.9 KB
ID:	10522630

    Backland XTD shell in 27.5 weighs 1146g. The 26.5 weighed 1107g. The 27.5 Backland liner is 316g (275g in 26.5)

    In a size 26.5 the boot sole length is 297mm. Expect the bsl to change by 10mm in every size increment

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20230224_160531.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	79.4 KB
ID:	10522631

    This is a two buckle boot. The upper buckle is a standard micro-adjustable forefoot buckle. The lowers are where it gets interesting where Atomic uses the CROSS LACE 2.5 system on the Backland XTD. This closure system is designed to wraps the complete lower foot using a cable and buckle cinch system.

    The goal is get fit, foot and ankle hold by lacing the adjustment system through the lower buckle. One advantage is that it also allows for quick engagement through the one buckle; and no doubt saves weight as well as complexity.

    Note that hardware is all fastened with allen bolts. I checked and they had plenty of loctite; something that one shouldn't take for granted (ahem Scarpa ) 

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20230224_160548_001.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	124.0 KB
ID:	10522632

    Closeup of the Atomic "Powershift" forward lean mechanism. Backland XTD comes stock at 15 deg forward lean. Simply loosen the allen bolt to slide the hardware up or down to get to either 13 or 17 deg. Remember to reassemble with lots of loctite. The walk mode is familiar, easy to operate and quite beefy.

    Also pictured is the external construction of the "Energy backbone - a reinforced, asymmetric backbone "providing extra strength for powerful skiing plus enhanced lateral energy transmission for better edge grip" 

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20230224_160612.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	108.1 KB
ID:	10522633

    Note the marvelous low friction IGUS polymer "friction-free" bushings. Combined with the hybrid overlap design which allows for a free floating stride you get a theoretical 74 degrees of stride; very nice for touring

    Gripwalk soles are compatible with Gripwalk bindings. You can get the Backland XTD with full rubber touring soles or with Gripwalk soles but you must choose that at point of purchase (can't swap them out)

    There are tech fittings of course so you can use this with tech bindings. 

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20230224_160640.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	219.5 KB
ID:	10522634

    See hardware attaching power straps and also the familiar fabric gaiter design shared with other boots of the Backland family to help prevent snow and moisture ingress. These had a habit of ripping if you weren't careful; or even if you were careful, getting torn over time and with wear.

    The Backland XTD uses a hybrid overlap method of construction. This essentially adapts a "touring" open-throat design (think of touring boots with tongues ala Dynafit Vulcan, Dalbello, Raichle etc) combined with more "alpinish" overlap shell construction (think of Atomic Hawx, K2 etc.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	hybridoverlap.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	191.8 KB
ID:	10522635

    Hybrid overlap allows for decently easy step in and touring (the walk mode isn't encumbered ) but, done well, also lends the performance benefits of overlap shell construction.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	20230224_160713.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	90.1 KB
ID:	10522636

    The Backland XTD "3D Platinum Tour" liner is heat-moldable, breathable and washable. It's got more substance and is consequently stiffer, and heavier than the liners in the other Backlands

    Also here you see something which lighter boots often don't have; a removeable boot board. That removeable boot board means the Backland XTD can be Memory-Fitted ie the Atomic process of heating the entire shell to get some custom fitting going not just in the liner (which is more familiar) but also in the shell.
    Last edited by LeeLau; 03-30-2023, 03:43 PM.

    Comment

    • LeeLau
      Registered User
      • Feb 2005
      • 14443

      #3
      For Wilcox. Now gotta go ski! Will add more when I have time

      As for skiing performance. Think of it as Vulcan without tongue. Ie not super stiff; not super progressive. But reasonably good and if I hadn't gotten spoiled by the Hawx maybe I'd be more effusive. But walks so well. To me, a reasonable compromise

      As for fit; lots of volume in forefoot. midfoot. Not as much of a cavernous space like the totally unanatomical Hojis but definitely not for low vol feet. I used the provided in-box volumizers to take up space and it the liners pack out then probably throw in Intuitions (which have more volume)

      Comment

      • adrian.bee
        Registered User
        • Dec 2016
        • 268

        #4
        Thank you for this post. These look and sound awesome.

        Based on what I am reading, these would be compatible with Tectons due to the larger lugs, correct?

        Comment

        • GoldenBC
          I Like Snow
          • Jun 2008
          • 1273

          #5
          Originally posted by adrian.bee
          Thank you for this post. These look and sound awesome.

          Based on what I am reading, these would be compatible with Tectons due to the larger lugs, correct?
          Yes, if it can fit in gripwalk bindings it can fit in tectons.

          Comment

          • LeeLau
            Registered User
            • Feb 2005
            • 14443

            #6
            Originally posted by GoldenBC
            Yes, if it can fit in gripwalk bindings it can fit in tectons.
            Correct. And Shifts, Kingpin etc

            Comment

            • LeeLau
              Registered User
              • Feb 2005
              • 14443

              #7
              Are the last set of pics showing up? I uploaded them via forum software but they were viewing at attachments rather than embeds.

              Comment

              • adrian.bee
                Registered User
                • Dec 2016
                • 268

                #8
                Originally posted by LeeLau
                Are the last set of pics showing up? I uploaded them via forum software but they were viewing at attachments rather than embeds.
                No - the attachment link shows up but not the pic

                Comment

                • skimeow
                  Registered User
                  • Dec 2021
                  • 19

                  #9
                  How does the flex and skiability compare to the Zero G? Is the Backland XTD a good fit for your foot or are you just making it work?

                  Also how do you have your Zero Gs set up to weight 1326? Mine are 26.5 with an Intuition Tour Pro MV and come in closer to 1450 with insoles?

                  Comment

                  • LeeLau
                    Registered User
                    • Feb 2005
                    • 14443

                    #10
                    Originally posted by adrian.bee
                    No - the attachment link shows up but not the pic
                    argh - uploaded and fixed now

                    Originally posted by skimeow
                    How does the flex and skiability compare to the Zero G? Is the Backland XTD a good fit for your foot or are you just making it work?

                    Also how do you have your Zero Gs set up to weight 1326? Mine are 26.5 with an Intuition Tour Pro MV and come in closer to 1450 with insoles?
                    Quest 1 - flex is about the same. ZGTP feels more progressive. Backland XTD is a bit more brick-wall when hitting the wall. But the Backland isn't as abrupt as the Vulcan with tongues (which, to me, was the epitome of abrupt flex stops),

                    Backland XTD is immediately a good fit for my typical AZN foot ie wide forefoot, flat feet with almost no arch. Normal ankles and moderate instep.

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	20230224_155142.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	99.3 KB
ID:	10522637

                    My ZGTP with Protour liner; no footbeds. 26.5. Can't really speak to your boot's weight as I didn't do anything special with mine

                    Comment

                    • dcpnz
                      Registered User
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 1511

                      #11
                      Atomic Backland XTD 120 - new for 2023 - 24 season

                      First (stock???) pic shoes a green accented boot, other images show black/ red. Is that grip walk vs rubber soles?
                      Also looks like you’re in 26.5 zgtp but 27.5 Backland xtd- is that by choice for fit reasons or just availability. What did you wear in regular old Backland?
                      297 bsl in 26.5 is same as 27.5 old Backland isn’t it?

                      Since you indicated it walks as well as Backland it must be miles better than xtd/zgtp. For many of us that’ll be a very worthwhile trade off even if it doesn’t ski quite as well.

                      Comment

                      • LeeLau
                        Registered User
                        • Feb 2005
                        • 14443

                        #12
                        Originally posted by dcpnz
                        First (stock???) pic shoes a green accented boot, other images show black/ red. Is that grip walk vs rubber soles?
                        Also looks like you’re in 26.5 zgtp but 27.5 Backland xtd- is that by choice for fit reasons or just availability. What did you wear in regular old Backland?
                        297 bsl in 26.5 is same as 27.5 old Backland isn’t it?

                        Since you indicated it walks as well as Backland it must be miles better than xtd/zgtp. For many of us that’ll be a very worthwhile trade off even if it doesn’t ski quite as well.
                        There's a gripwalk version and a full touring sole version. The stock pic is the full touring sole. The GW version is the pair I grabbed

                        At first I tried the 27.5 Backland XTD thinking I'd have to size up. Mistake. That's a 307mm bsl and too big for me. I then tried the 26.5 (297mm bsl). Better! I got the Gripwalk version in both as that's all they have for me to use.

                        It walks (to me I interpret that as strides) as well as older Backland. Speaking to other boots I've owned it strides as well as TLT5; or F1 (other boots that stride well). It also strides better than Hoji Pro which despite the #pantsalwaysdown BS I found only toured well if you loosened the mid foot instep buckle.

                        So yeah it's a lot better than Hawx XTD or ZGTP (my current boots).

                        Edit - my boot size

                        TLT5 27.5
                        Vulcan 27.5
                        Maestrale 27
                        Tecnica Cochise 26.5
                        ZGTP 26.5
                        Hawx v1 and v2 26.5
                        Dalbello Lupo 26.5
                        Hoji Pro tour 26.5

                        Comment

                        • dcpnz
                          Registered User
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 1511

                          #13
                          Atomic Backland XTD 120 - new for 2023 - 24 season

                          ^^
                          Love the TLT5 references. After all these years that’s still the boot I’m trying to find something to replace. Tried several (not as many as you of course) - heavier that ski well / walk worse, lighter that walk better / ski worse but none that FOR ME provide a better balance and I’m hopeful this is it cos I don’t think I can eek much more out of my pair

                          Comment

                          • LeeLau
                            Registered User
                            • Feb 2005
                            • 14443

                            #14
                            Originally posted by dcpnz
                            ^^
                            Love the TLT5 references. After all these years that’s still the boot I’m trying to find something to replace. Tried several (not as many as you of course) - heavier that ski well / walk worse, lighter that walk better / ski worse but none that FOR ME provide a better balance and I’m hopeful this is it cos I don’t think I can eek much more out of my pair
                            My TLT5s blew up after 100+ days. They were fragile but ahead of their time. It did cure me of being too weight weenie with gear (why I have F1 and not F1 LT) as the breakage could have been bad.

                            That Backland XTD in 26.5 with an Intuition is a bit under 1360g for me. Which isn't bad at all
                            Last edited by LeeLau; 01-15-2024, 08:26 PM.

                            Comment

                            • wilcox510
                              u
                              • Oct 2004
                              • 1171

                              #15
                              Is the one you’re testing the carbon version? Or is that the one with the green instead of red?

                              Comment

                              Working...