The Atomic Ski Boot Thread

[onenerdykid]

This is a bit overdue but dump your Atomic ski boot questions here and I will do my best to answer them in a semi-professional manner.

To kick this off, let me officially introduce some new boots for the 23/24 winter season (landing in shops autumn 2023):

Hawx Ultra XTD v2


Quick Stats
• Same last as before (no changes)- 98mm/26.5
• Same out-of-the-box geometry as before- 15° forward lean, 4° ramp angle.
• Same 54° of cuff ROM.
• Full PU construction, cuff & shell. No Grilamid, no Pebax, no polypropylene, no polyolefin.
• Thicker lower shell and thicker cuff for more stability, better damping, more durability for daily resort use.
• All new Mimic liner construction with our 3D stretch toe box, an adjustable/removeable tongue and a much improved Achilles Flex Zone to match the cuff movement.
• New ski/walk mechanism allows for 3 forward lean settings (no flip chips) 13°-15°-17°
• New glued-on Skywalk GripWalk rubber sole ISO 23223 (lower standheight & less weight allow us to go full PU but still keep a respectable weight).
• Available with an all new, ski boot specific BOA system or traditional buckles (assuming this will be a bigger discussion to follow)
• Unisex flexes: 130, 120, 110
• Women’s flexes: 115, 95
• 1830g / 26.5

[onenerdykid]

Backland XTD Carbon 120



Quick Stats
• Imagine a Hawx Prime with 74° of better-than-Backland cuff ROM, a 120 flex and a full rubber touring norm sole (or GripWalk if you want).
• 1390g / 26.5
• 100mm, medium volume last (based on Hawx Prime)
• Same cuff height (front & rear) as Hawx Prime
• New lower shell construction blends an overlap & open-throat construction together for the best of easy on/off and foot wrapping
• Frictionless “Mirror” Pivots deliver a more free-gliding cuff than Backland (they are symmetrical & parallel in their orientation)
• New ski/walk mechanism allows for 3 forward lean settings (no flip chips) 13°-15°-17°
• Available as a touring norm ISO 9523 boot or as GripWalk (it’s not swappable, just made either way)

[arild]

Ok fun and all. Important stuff, though. Can the redster cs be black with red logos, in the nordica font, next year? Would help me tricking the wife.

support the raddest project going: http://heritagelabskis.com

[bean]

How much of the Hawx weight is shell vs. liner? +400g at 26.5 is big. How's the liner compared to, say, an intuition?

Disappointed the backland is wide because it looks sweet.

How's the multiple forward lean settings work? I assume it's not just "close it and hope it locks in the one you want."

[bamboocoreONLY]

Ok fun and all. Important stuff, though. Can the redster cs be black with red logos, in the nordica font, next year? Would help me tricking the wife.

support the raddest project going: http://heritagelabskis.com

yeah but without red boots, how will people know I'm fast?

Love that boot though

[GoldenBC]

Worth noting, as you told me Matt, that the shell comes out roomier than the old hawx xtd because of less shrinkage from the PU vs the grilamid. It feels different and not just from the liner. And this is a very good thing. There is noticeably more room in the toes of the v2 ultra xtd.

[Tjaardbreeuwer]

Ok fun and all. Important stuff, though. Can the redster cs be black with red logos, in the nordica font, next year? Would help me tricking the wife.

support the raddest project going: http://heritagelabskis.com

That’s not tricking. It’s just, shall we say, letting sleeping dogs lie…

[Tjaardbreeuwer]

Backland XTD Carbon 120

[ATTACH=CONFIG]443465[/ATTACH]

Quick Stats
• Imagine a Hawx Prime with 74° of better-than-Backland cuff ROM, a 120 flex and a full rubber touring norm sole (or GripWalk if you want).
• 1390g / 26.5
• 100mm, medium volume last (based on Hawx Prime)
• Same cuff height (front & rear) as Hawx Prime
• New lower shell construction blends an overlap & open-throat construction together for the best of easy on/off and foot wrapping
• Frictionless “Mirror” Pivots deliver a more free-gliding cuff than Backland (they are symmetrical & parallel in their orientation)

You make me so sad. With one word: “Prime”. That should be “ultra”.

My narrow feet love the Backland Carbon, and could even do with a bit less width. I had hoped for the same fit in a beefier model. All the features sound great, I love the idea of a boot that is not super light, but has great walking. In my mind, that matters more than weight.
I have a high instep, so the open top helps me for fit, and then I have no need for a high volume last.

I will go off and cry in a corner now.

[Tjaardbreeuwer]

But my personal fit issues aside, it looks like a really complete line up of walk compatible boots. Let me see if I get this straight:

Beefy, PU boot for the 50/50 crowd, or people who want a touring boot with maximum ski performance. Buckle or Alpine Boa options.

Very light, super nimble boot for the all about the up crowd. With Buckles or Boa’s. Or a recreational skimo race version.

In between boot with solid weight and great walkability, with touring sole or Gripwalk.

If you can keep track of all those skus, it sure seems like you have something for everyone.

[onenerdykid]

How much of the Hawx weight is shell vs. liner? +400g at 26.5 is big. How's the liner compared to, say, an intuition?

Disappointed the backland is wide because it looks sweet.

How's the multiple forward lean settings work? I assume it's not just "close it and hope it locks in the one you want."

IIRC the liner is 425-ish grams, definitely heavier than an intuition but due to the Mimic material, heat moldable cuff, heat moldable tongue and adjustable tongue it will mold more precisely and be more powerful on the down.

Forward lean adjustment is the same since 2019 Backland & Prime XTD - loosen the screws, position into the setting you want, add thread lock and retighten screws. Doesn't budge.

[onenerdykid]

Worth noting, as you told me Matt, that the shell comes out roomier than the old hawx xtd because of less shrinkage from the PU vs the grilamid. It feels different and not just from the liner. And this is a very good thing. There is noticeably more room in the toes of the v2 ultra xtd.

Precisely - it's now exactly on par with regular Hawx Ultra.

[onenerdykid]

You make me so sad. With one word: “Prime”. That should be “ultra”.

My narrow feet love the Backland Carbon, and could even do with a bit less width. I had hoped for the same fit in a beefier model. All the features sound great, I love the idea of a boot that is not super light, but has great walking. In my mind, that matters more than weight.
I have a high instep, so the open top helps me for fit, and then I have no need for a high volume last.

I will go off and cry in a corner now.

You and me both, but we'll start here and see if anything narrower comes along in the future.

[gregL]

Ok fun and all. Important stuff, though. Can the redster cs be black with red logos, in the nordica font, next year? Would help me tricking the wife.

support the raddest project going: http://heritagelabskis.com

You can buy one now: https://www.levelninesports.com/atom...ki-boots-2021/

[Benneke10]

You make me so sad. With one word: “Prime”. That should be “ultra”.

Buy the Hawx Ultra 130 XTD from recent years. Pretty much the same weight as this new Backland XTD, and great low-volume fit. Yeah it probably doesn't walk as well and doesn't have a full rubber sole but it skis great.

[bean]

Buy the Hawx Ultra 130 XTD from recent years. Pretty much the same weight as this new Backland XTD, and great low-volume fit. Yeah it probably doesn't walk as well and doesn't have a full rubber sole but it skis great.

I've got a first-gen Hawx Ultra XTD 130 with an intuition and it's still doing inbounds duty but I've pulled the powerstrap screws and if I get the new XTD next year planning to remove the 4th buckle. Won't walk as well as the backland xtd but at least the weight is down there and it skis great in the BC. Maybe in a couple years there'll be a backland xtd ultra and I can move to that.