Salomon QST mounting

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • utahoutsider
    Registered User
    • Nov 2017
    • 36

    #1

    Salomon QST mounting

    To the mags that’s have skied the QST 106’s and 118’s what you opinion on mounting. Mount at recommended. Mounting forward or back? I tried to search the forum for this topic and couldn’t find anything. Appreciate the help!


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
  • Skidog
    Banned
    • May 2007
    • 14406

    #2
    I have my rocker2 118 at center. Maybe 1mm back, but I think their lines are pretty good.

    Sent from my XT1650 using TGR Forums mobile app

    Comment

    • DropCliffsNotBombs
      Registered User
      • Dec 2007
      • 2098

      #3
      On. The. Line.
      Leave No Turn Unstoned!

      Comment

      • gregL
        User
        • Dec 2010
        • 5557

        #4
        Originally posted by Skidog
        I have my rocker2 118 at center.[/URL]
        You mean Rocker 2 122? They didn't make a 118. Very different ski, personally I would mount the Rocker 2 at -2 cm. The QST skis I would mount on the line unless I was stepping up in length.
        http://www.randosaigai.com

        Comment

        • utahoutsider
          Registered User
          • Nov 2017
          • 36

          #5
          I’m skiing the 118’s in the 192 and the 106’s in the 188


          Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

          Comment

          • Skidog
            Banned
            • May 2007
            • 14406

            #6


            Sorry 115. But yeah more or less like factory lines. I'm at -5ish on these

            Sent from my XT1650 using TGR Forums mobile app

            Comment

            • muted
              Registered User
              • Aug 2007
              • 7276

              #7
              Uh, Ski Dog, that's a totally different ski, are you paying attention here?

              I own the Rocker2 and the QST 118 and they are quite different.

              Comment

              • Skidog
                Banned
                • May 2007
                • 14406

                #8
                Originally posted by muted
                Uh, Ski Dog, that's a totally different ski, are you paying attention here?

                I own the Rocker2 and the QST 118 and they are quite different.
                ive skied both and aside from the flatter tail on the QST i think they ski quite similarly...

                Comment

                • Skidog
                  Banned
                  • May 2007
                  • 14406

                  #9
                  QST 118 185cm is 142, 118, 129
                  R2 115 188cm is 139, 115, 131

                  I didnt notice a HUGE difference in the way these skied, and would still stick with the recco lines.

                  Comment

                  • djhutch
                    Registered User
                    • Dec 2014
                    • 61

                    #10
                    How do the people that have skied the QST 118 like 'em?

                    I have pair still in the wrapper, but wasn't thrilled Outdoor Gear Lab (who have great climbing gear reviews, maybe more iffy ski gear reviews) rated them dead fucking last:

                    We purchased, tested, and compared the best all-mountain skis for 2026. Recommendations for men and women include award winners from Volkl, Nordica, HEAD...

                    Comment

                    • smooth operator
                      Registered User
                      • Jan 2014
                      • 686

                      #11
                      Originally posted by djhutch
                      How do the people that have skied the QST 118 like 'em?

                      I have pair still in the wrapper, but wasn't thrilled Outdoor Gear Lab (who have great climbing gear reviews, maybe more iffy ski gear reviews) rated them dead fucking last:

                      https://www.outdoorgearlab.com/topic...st-powder-skis
                      Funny review, judging by the picture they tested a few 16/17 models as 17/18 powder skis, most notably the Spur that underwent quite some changes cough-a completely different ski-cough

                      Comment

                      • utahoutsider
                        Registered User
                        • Nov 2017
                        • 36

                        #12
                        If you don’t like em don’t tell me ha ha. I’m just getting ready to mount mine tonight [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]


                        Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

                        Comment

                        • muted
                          Registered User
                          • Aug 2007
                          • 7276

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Skidog
                          QST 118 185cm is 142, 118, 129
                          R2 115 188cm is 139, 115, 131

                          I didnt notice a HUGE difference in the way these skied, and would still stick with the recco lines.
                          The QST 118 is powder ski with a backbone, the R2 is a powder ski with no backbone. I'm used to buying stiff traditional skis, and when I skied the R2 I had to pussyfoot a bit, it's soft, I skied more gingerly. The QST 118 is a ski where I thought, "This is a total compromise but it's the compromise I'm very happy with". It's much better for going fast and landing cliffs.

                          djhutch, people say the QST 118 does fine or good enough on hardpack, but I disagree. Otherwise it's a fun fast ski on powder days, from quick slashes to high speed shit. I have the 192 BTW.

                          Comment

                          • muted
                            Registered User
                            • Aug 2007
                            • 7276

                            #14
                            Originally posted by djhutch
                            How do the people that have skied the QST 118 like 'em?

                            I have pair still in the wrapper, but wasn't thrilled Outdoor Gear Lab (who have great climbing gear reviews, maybe more iffy ski gear reviews) rated them dead fucking last:

                            https://www.outdoorgearlab.com/topic...st-powder-skis
                            "Soft and floaty; best suited for fresh, low-angle powder."

                            Ha, tell that to all the Salomon athletes who use this as their daily driver. I may be missing out by not owning a better ski, but I don't know what I'm missing and these skis got much better reviews elsewhere so I don't think I'm riding total duds. This ski made me change my skiing style a bit, but in a good way.

                            Comment

                            • muted
                              Registered User
                              • Aug 2007
                              • 7276

                              #15
                              " For this review, we tested the QST 118 in its 178 cm length"

                              "When revved up to speed in secondhand snow, the QST 118 will shutter and bounce out of balance. We suspect that this issue is more specific to our larger testers and would be less pronounced in the longer 185 cm or 192 cm options"

                              They didn't ski the 185 or 192???? Fuck these guys. I'm not saying these are stiff skis, they are powder-day only skis, but what a joke.

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	276335_30151_L.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	72.4 KB
ID:	10308363
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	276333_15114_L.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	68.7 KB
ID:	10308364

                              Comment

                              Working...