Teton Gravity Research Forums Statistics

Collapse

Topics: 305,673   Posts: 6,865,479   Members: 413,527   Active Members: 12,005
Welcome to our newest member, flyfishstarvalley.

Ask the experts

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • toast2266
    over rotated
    • Dec 2007
    • 15042

    #8611
    Originally posted by HAB
    I want to know what the hell their test methodology was, because a lot of those results make very little sense based on my experiences with those brakes.

    There's also a lot of nonsense in their writeups, including citing the Hope E4 as having 4 16mm pistons in one place (correct) and then saying that the E4 has 2 16s and 2 14s (wrong), with the V4 having 4 16s (also wrong) elsewhere.
    Yeah, no idea. I feel like brake testing is really hard to do consistently, because any dyno test I see is all over the board.

    Mostly I think it's hard to quantify modulation. Sram's power comes on gradually and builds with more lever pressure. Shimanos power comes on quickly but then doesn't really build that much. Both are good, but in different situations. Not sure how to quantify that effectively with a dyno test.

    Comment

    • HAB
      Registered User
      • Jan 2019
      • 1722

      #8612
      Originally posted by toast2266
      Yeah, no idea. I feel like brake testing is really hard to do consistently, because any dyno test I see is all over the board.

      Mostly I think it's hard to quantify modulation. Sram's power comes on gradually and builds with more lever pressure. Shimanos power comes on quickly but then doesn't really build that much. Both are good, but in different situations. Not sure how to quantify that effectively with a dyno test.
      Totally, it's a hard thing to do well. I'm just very suspect of that test, based on having tried a whole lot of those brakes, and how little their results line up with my experience.

      Comment

      • summit
        *NOT* an expert
        • Oct 2003
        • 23205

        #8613
        New wheelset, DT240 MS 148x12, put my XT 10-51 on it, and shifting is all off vs the DT350 MS on the other wheelset, almost like the the cassette isn't all the way flush to the hub, except it appears to be so.

        Mech required moving both high and low limit, barrel adjust out all tension, still feels like there is too much tension, and if I tighten the rear axle all the way there is cassette drag on the stay that can be felt when pedaling (but wheel spins with no friction).

        What is wrong?
        Originally posted by blurred
        skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

        Comment

        • NuMexJoe
          Registered User
          • Mar 2011
          • 311

          #8614
          Originally posted by Danno
          If I had a spare pair of SPDs lying around I would just use them and not bother looking to buy pedals, lol.
          You want a pair? I've got a drawer with several 20-year old SPD pairs (Wellgo & Ritchey, mostly) that have collected dust since I made the switch to Time ATACs long ago. Yours for the cost of shipping.
          Click image for larger version

Name:	pedals.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.48 MB
ID:	10497906

          Comment

          • toast2266
            over rotated
            • Dec 2007
            • 15042

            #8615
            Originally posted by HAB
            Totally, it's a hard thing to do well. I'm just very suspect of that test, based on having tried a whole lot of those brakes, and how little their results line up with my experience.
            I also just think lab conditions are different than real world conditions. One of their tests that they put some emphasis on is a steady deceleration from 45kph to 0 with constant pressure at the lever. While that's a decent test and fairly repeatable in a lab setting, it's realistically not something that probably happens in the real world all that often. They seemed to indicate that heat build up had a pretty significant impact on brake performance, and I would imagine quantifying the impact of heat on the system in a real world setting is tough.

            I don't really doubt their results. I just doubt how applicable those are to all the nuances of how real world use actually happens.

            Comment

            • El Chupacabra
              pillowpants
              • Sep 2004
              • 21865

              #8616
              How's Specialized with tire warranty?

              Mounted a new Purgatory 2.6 yesterday on a new wheel (1 ride), it seated properly all around the bead. On Mrs C's new Ripley, on an Ibis Blackbird rim. Left it sitting on the bike in the workstand, occasionally spin the tire when I walk by. Zero rides on this tire. Sitting at maybe 30psi.

              Today while wrenching on the truck, tire blew off the rim and sprayed sealant all over. Remounted and tried airing up, it blew off immediately. It remounted way too easily so I expect the bead is damaged.

              Bought it from Performance Bike online, and have a message in to them. Wondering how, warranty works on tires. I've never warrantied a tire - and never had a new one blow off before.
              Originally posted by powder11
              if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.

              Comment

              • Whiteroom_Guardian
                ____________________
                • May 2008
                • 17349

                #8617
                What kind of fuckery is this? I pulled the crankset like 30ish miles ago. 8 miles into my ride today and I look down and see a big gap on the spindle non-drive side...did I break and lose a spacer? The arm is torqued on there to spec and not loose or backed out. There is no spacer on the drive side.
                www.LastBestRealty.com
                www.freeridesystems.com

                Comment

                • EWG
                  here to help
                  • Sep 2018
                  • 7351

                  #8618
                  Originally posted by NuMexJoe
                  You want a pair? I've got a drawer with several 20-year old SPD pairs (Wellgo & Ritchey, mostly) that have collected dust since I made the switch to Time ATACs long ago. Yours for the cost of shipping.
                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]423323[/ATTACH]
                  You should definitely take the Ritcheys and then report back about how many times you crater onto your side from a complete stop when the things hold on like a pipe clamp.

                  Video would be nice for us. Entertainment value and all.

                  Comment

                  • nickwm21
                    ahhhh!
                    • Jan 2008
                    • 6460

                    #8619
                    Originally posted by Danno
                    Converting an old mountain bike into a bike path/gravel/townie/backup mt bike. Because of the multiple uses, looking for SPD/flat pedals. The more inexpensive the better, so long as it works well. I can accept a little weight penalty given the expected uses.

                    This from Venzo (never heard of them but decent reviews): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01M5J9VGY/
                    This from Shimano (more $ than I want to spend if possible): https://www.amazon.com/SHIMANO-clipl...dp/B000NORMU4/

                    Are there other better options? Should I just stick with a name brand like Shimano? Anything (products or thoughts) I'm not considering?
                    More money than you want to spend but I have Shimano T8000s on my townie. Real XT spd on one side, real aluminum flat pedal with replaceable pins on the other. Neutral weighted (some of the other combo pedals are weighted to spin to the clip side or flat side)

                    https://bike.shimano.com/en-EU/produ.../PD-T8000.html


                    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
                    Best Skier on the Mountain
                    Self-Certified
                    1992 - 2012
                    Squaw Valley, USA

                    Comment

                    • HAB
                      Registered User
                      • Jan 2019
                      • 1722

                      #8620
                      Originally posted by toast2266
                      I also just think lab conditions are different than real world conditions. One of their tests that they put some emphasis on is a steady deceleration from 45kph to 0 with constant pressure at the lever. While that's a decent test and fairly repeatable in a lab setting, it's realistically not something that probably happens in the real world all that often. They seemed to indicate that heat build up had a pretty significant impact on brake performance, and I would imagine quantifying the impact of heat on the system in a real world setting is tough.

                      I don't really doubt their results. I just doubt how applicable those are to all the nuances of how real world use actually happens.
                      That's kind of what I mean though. Like, I don't doubt that they collected data that says what they reported. I just don't think what they're tested is relevant to the real world. A well designed lab test absolutely can be representative, but achieving "well designed" is hard.

                      Comment

                      • Eluder
                        Hack Master
                        • Oct 2008
                        • 4860

                        #8621
                        Originally posted by Whiteroom_Guardian
                        What kind of fuckery is this? I pulled the crankset like 30ish miles ago. 8 miles into my ride today and I look down and see a big gap on the spindle non-drive side...did I break and lose a spacer? The arm is torqued on there to spec and not loose or backed out. There is no spacer on the drive side.
                        need more info, they look like 8120s?
                        a positive attitude will not solve all of your problems, but it may annoy enough people to make it worth the effort

                        Formerly Rludes025

                        Comment

                        • Whiteroom_Guardian
                          ____________________
                          • May 2008
                          • 17349

                          #8622
                          Originally posted by Eluder
                          need more info, they look like 8120s?
                          Shimano XT 12-speed on GG Gnarvana. Assuming I somehow lost a spacer by either it breaking or somehow losing one when I pulled the cranks which side do I put the spacers on? I feel like when I pulled the cranks there were two on the non-drive side and now only one?!

                          Edit to add: So I think I need one on each side of the BB and I think maybe the one on the drive side cracked and fell off somehow.
                          www.LastBestRealty.com
                          www.freeridesystems.com

                          Comment

                          • Eluder
                            Hack Master
                            • Oct 2008
                            • 4860

                            #8623
                            Look at the back of the drive side crank arm by the pedal hole and it will tell you the exact model, this will tell us how many spacers you are suppose to have.



                            it is more likely it fell off during installation than broke so look around where did the deed.

                            the "rings" in this diagram are just orings that are part of the spacer.
                            a positive attitude will not solve all of your problems, but it may annoy enough people to make it worth the effort

                            Formerly Rludes025

                            Comment

                            • grskier
                              Um, yeah, that guy
                              • Jan 2006
                              • 12716

                              #8624
                              Originally posted by summit
                              New wheelset, DT240 MS 148x12, put my XT 10-51 on it, and shifting is all off vs the DT350 MS on the other wheelset, almost like the the cassette isn't all the way flush to the hub, except it appears to be so.

                              Mech required moving both high and low limit, barrel adjust out all tension, still feels like there is too much tension, and if I tighten the rear axle all the way there is cassette drag on the stay that can be felt when pedaling (but wheel spins with no friction).

                              What is wrong?
                              Do they have the same offset?
                              www.dpsskis.com
                              www.point6.com
                              formerly an ambassador for a few others, but the ski industry is... interesting.
                              Fukt: a very small amount of snow.

                              Comment

                              • grskier
                                Um, yeah, that guy
                                • Jan 2006
                                • 12716

                                #8625
                                Originally posted by toast2266
                                I also just think lab conditions are different than real world conditions. One of their tests that they put some emphasis on is a steady deceleration from 45kph to 0 with constant pressure at the lever. While that's a decent test and fairly repeatable in a lab setting, it's realistically not something that probably happens in the real world all that often. They seemed to indicate that heat build up had a pretty significant impact on brake performance, and I would imagine quantifying the impact of heat on the system in a real world setting is tough.

                                I don't really doubt their results. I just doubt how applicable those are to all the nuances of how real world use actually happens.
                                Only thing I'll say about a test like that, while it doesn't simulate riding your brakes on a steep decent constantly, or long stops coming up to a trail crossing or whatever, what it may do is answer some variable in the equation that you all think about. More of an empirical test than anything. How long to stop from X speed with 4N of force applied to the brake lever... I don't know if they did a series or whatever to develop any equations, but I could see that being part of a process.
                                www.dpsskis.com
                                www.point6.com
                                formerly an ambassador for a few others, but the ski industry is... interesting.
                                Fukt: a very small amount of snow.

                                Comment

                                Working...